Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 232-233. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.6.232-c
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 232-233
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
The objective structured clinical examination
MacDara McCauley, Senior Registrar
St Davnets Hospital, County Monaghan
The case for and against the objective structured clinical examination
(OSCE) has generated many interesting letters in the Bulletin
recently. The unequivocal and emphatic response by Mortimer & Lunn
(Psychiatric Bulletin, December 2004, 28, 458) is welcome. It
is clearly here to stay (apology unnecessary, in my
opinion).
The pros - examination of a broad range of scenarios, reducing the luck
factor - outweigh, I feel, concerns about limited time and the fostering of
fast psychiatry (Yak et al, Psychiatric Bulletin, July
2004, 28, 265-266). It is a useful addition to the examination format.
However, concerns about the challenge of handling the long case format deserve
a response.
The ability to deal with long cases should be a fundamental skill acquired
during ones training. Surely it is never too early to acquire this
skill when embarking on a career in psychiatry. We all recognise that
examinations provide a major (for some essential) incentive to learn.
Therefore, unlike Narula (Psychiatric Bulletin, February 2005,
29, 72-73), rather than review the long case format in the Part II
examination, I would advocate the use of both the OSCE and long case formats
for both parts of the examination. Obviously, this would lead to some
logistical problems but would the College fear being accused of placing too
much emphasis on clinical acumen?