Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 316. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.8.316-a
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 316
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Do we really need a duty consultant?
Syed Husain, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist
Sandalwood Court, Highworth Road, Swindon SN3 4WF
As much as I would like to agree with Riordans proposal that
consultant psychiatrists provide only telephone advice rather than a
conventional out-of-hours service (Psychiatric Bulletin, May 2005,
29, 193-194), I am afraid he does not take into account one of the core
duties when on call. This involves carrying out assessments under the Mental
Health Act 1983 for which there is no alternative than a face-to-face
interview. In my experience most requests come from police stations for
assessments of people who have been taken to the cells as a place of safety if
they appear to be suffering from a psychiatric disorder or have been arrested
for an offence. Recent British Medical Association guidance (BMA, 2004)
emphasises the desirability of using alternatives to prosecution, such as
admission to hospital, where detainees have a psychiatric disorder and it is
not in the public interest to prosecute. Without a duty consultant available
to make direct mental state examinations, these patients and other urgent
cases in the community would be left suffering overnight which, depending upon
their risk behaviours, could result in potentially disastrous outcomes.
References
BMA & ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC PRACTITIONERS (2004)
Healthcare of Detainees in Police Stations. London:
BMA.