Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 348-351. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.9.348
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 348-351
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
From specialist registrar to consultant: permission to land?
Asim Naeem, Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry (Old Age Psychiatry and Learning
Disability)
Department of Mental Health (Psychiatry of Disability), St Georges
Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE, e-mail:
a.naeem{at}sghms.ac.uk
Joan Rutherford, Consultant Psychiatrist and SpR Trainer in General Adult
Psychiatry
SW London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust, Tolworth
Hospital, Red Lion Road, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 7QU
Chris Kenn, Consultant Psychiatrist and SpR Trainer in General Adult
Psychiatry
SW London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust, Queen
Marys University Hospital, Roehampton Lane, London SW15 5PN

Introduction
After many years of hard work and training, the transition from
trainee to
consultant is potentially challenging. Having successfully
negotiated the
hurdles of pre-registration training, the MRCPsych
examination and the
specialist registrar (SpR) interview, trainees
have to pass one final signpost
to mark the end of their formal
training securing their first
substantive consultant
psychiatrist post. Despite overall vacancy rates of
about 12%
for consultant psychiatrists in the UK
(
Royal College of Psychiatrists,
2002),
competition can be intense for some posts.
This paper aims to guide trainees in the transition from SpR to consultant,
via RITA (record of in-training assessment) reviews, CCT (certificate of
completion of specialist training) awards, specialist registers and the
consultant interview.

Higher specialist training
The setting of educational objectives at the outset of each
SpR post can
ensure that trainees develop the relevant competency
required during higher
specialist training (HST). Such objectives
should be set jointly by the
trainee and trainer, and adhere
to the acronym SMART (i.e. be
specific, measurable,
achievable, realistic and time limited). They should
relate
to the Colleges core and additional
competencies required for HST, and be appropriate to the stage
of SpR
training. It can be convenient to group such objectives
into four broad
categories: research, clinical, teaching and
management.
Good planning can ensure that trainees make constructive use of their
research day sessions. Involvement in research projects can help trainees to
develop an understanding of the principles of research methodology and audit,
and refine their organisational, time management and leadership skills
(Strydom & Higgins, 2004). It also provides experience in writing protocols and papers for peer review
and obtaining ethical approval for projects. Publications can improve a
trainees competitiveness at consultant selection
(Guthrie & Black,
1991).
Although most SpRs believe research to be important
(Allsopp et al, 2002), there are concerns about the effectiveness of the current research day
(Vassilas et al,
2002). Only half of the SpRs in psychiatry have ever managed to
secure a publication (Smart &
Cottrell, 2000). Recent surveys have suggested that problems with
lack of experience, resources and supervision may be a reason for this
(Petrie et al,
2003).
Recommendation 1. Box 1 outlines our advice on how SpRs can make
more effective use of their research day.
Many of our suggestions in Box 1 parallel the recent recommendations made
by the Collegiate Trainees Committee, that there should be greater
flexibility in the use of the research day
(Ramchandani et al,
2001). Securing a publication by writing up how you modified an
existing practice guideline will look more impressive than a half-completed
randomised controlled trial that failed to get published.
| Box 1. How can the SpR research day be used more effectively?
- Aim to do collaborative work, either with other SpRs or with consultants
who have an established record of publications
- Attend local university courses on literature searching, writing protocols,
research methodology, statistics, etc. before starting any projects
- Be realistic about the time-span of a project (e.g. literature searching
and obtaining ethical approval may take up to18 months)
- Think innovatively are there questionnaire surveys/audits that can
be performed to help develop a new intervention or can modifications be made
to existing practice guidelines?
- Consider spending some sessions with your trusts clinical governance
department, assisting them with any regional audits required by the Department
of Health
- Consider what could be written as a paper at every stage in the research
process, rather than leaving it to the end (e.g. a review paper after your
literature search?)
- Target and select appropriate journals for submission of any papers, rather
than attempt a blanket top-down approach.
SpR, specialist registrar.
|
Special interest sessions should be organised in advance of each SpR post.
Careful planning can ensure that they are linked to your intended career
plans. Therefore, a trainee interested in organic aspects of psychiatry may
organise their sessions in an epilepsy clinic and a liaison psychiatric
service, over a 1- to 2-year period.
Recommendation 2. Utilise thebank of suitable special
interest placements which the College encourages HST programme directors to
keep, based upon feedback of previous trainees. Use some of the sessions to
fill in training opportunities not readily available elsewhere, e.g. family
therapy.
SpRs should aim to develop good teaching skills, including experience in
examining (and giving constructive feedback to) senior house officers (SHOs)
preparing for the MRCPsych examination and medical students. It is also
important to gain experience in effective communication, negotiation
(including resource and conflict management) and managing meetings
(Heard et al, 2001).
Regional and national courses provide good opportunities for training in these
areas.
Recommendation 3. Use some of your special interest sessions
toshadow the consultant representative on local committees for
drugs and therapeutics, risk management and clinical governance. Be proactive
in gaining other hands-on local management experience, e.g. does
your region need a new laptop computer/projector for their academic programme
(find out what can facilitate funding, who provides the budget and who
authorises it)?
Up to 12 months work in an out-of-programme experience
(Stratford, 2003), either
abroad or in a related sub-specialty, can be of benefit to trainees. This
should be planned in advance, and approval is needed from your programme
director, regional advisor and the postgraduate dean. Such posts can count
towards CCT approval with agreement of the College.
Log books provide an excellent means of recording the experience and
competencies gained during SpR training
(Paice & Ginsburg, 2003), and should be filled in prospectively.

RITA reviews
The annual review process should ideally be a positive and supportive
experience but still be able to highlight additional or further
training needs
(
Pidd, 2003). Recent research
analysing the
outcome of RITAs for UK psychiatric SpRs showed that about 98%
were assessed as satisfactory (RITA grade C)
(
Tunbridge et al,
2004). SpRs should use the RITA process to help identify
their own
preferred methods of systematically recording their
yearly training
experiences (e.g. log books, feedback letters,
attendance certificates).
Consider making use of 360-degree
feedback, by obtaining
information on your performance
from multi-professional colleagues. Many of
these processes
could be applied to your career as a consultant, aiding the
mandatory appraisal process. They can also help to identify
any deficits in
the experiences available within your training
scheme.
Recommendation 4. Get used to incorporating your yearly educational
objectives (see Table 1) into
the RITA process, as they closely resemble the format of personal development
plans, which will be a central element of the consultant appraisal process
(Newby, 2003).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1. A sample educational objective that could be reviewed as part of the
record of in-training assessment process
|

Acting up
During the final year of HST, up to 3 months spent in a locum
consultant
post (in the appropriate specialty) may count towards
the CCT award. This
provides a realistic taster
for consultant life (attending
directorate meetings, running
clinics, being team leader and deciding
priorities) in a semi-protected
environment
(
Pickersgill et al,
2003).
Recommendation 5. In acting up, ensure that you have adequate
supervision arrangements and litigation cover.

Specialist registers
Although SpRs can be interviewed for a substantive consultant
post during
the last 3 months of their training, they can only
move into such a post once
their details appear on the General
Medical Councils (GMC) specialist
register. Upon successful
completion of the final appraisal (RITA G), the
postgraduate
dean notifies the College, who will recommend to the Postgraduate
Medical Education and Training Board that a CCT award is granted.
Once the SpR
has completed a CCT application form and sent
off the application fee, a CCT
certificate is issued (around
2-4 weeks before the CCT completion date). An
accompanying
form, sent with the CCT certificate, must be completed and
forwarded
to the GMC before entry onto the specialist register can be
completed.
Recommendation 6. Consider using your 6 months period of
grace by remaining on the training programme and completing any
research publications while actively looking for a substantive consultant
post.

The new consultant entry scheme
SpRs who have completed their HST may opt to enter the new consultant
entry
scheme prior to applying for their first substantive
consultant post.
Placement on the scheme (in a locum consultant
post) is usually limited to 6
months and is organised via National
Health Service (NHS) Professionals
(
http://www.nhsprofessionals.nhs.uk/).
Such placements have the advantage of having two protected
sessions a week for
professional development, a personal development
plan and a mentor.

Selecting a consultant post
Available consultant posts are advertised in the weekly
BMJ
Careers. The website
http://www.bmjcareers.com
allows identification
of advertised posts in particular regions.
Adplus
has helped to simplify the application process for some
posts
by providing job profiles, local trust information and application
packs
online. Regional advisors in psychiatry approve consultant
job descriptions,
and can be a useful source of information
regarding the post itself.
Recommendation 7. Beware of large job adverts in glorious
technicolour, showing beautiful, rural scenery! It could imply that the trust
is awash with money (uncommon in the NHS), is led by enthusiastic clinical
managers or is in the middle of a recruitment crisis.
Among the extensive lists of senior managers in the trust and the
demographic details of the area, hidden within the job description should be
the essential details of the post:
- is this a new post or an old one?
- has the catchment area size been changed if so, why?
- do the in-patient beds still exist or are they being cut or still
developed?
- are there vacancies (and plans to appoint) among the community based
team?
- is there an identified full-time, or equivalent, secretary?
- does the post have a full-time staff grade or associate specialist
doctor?
- is the post approved for regional SHO training and is there an opportunity
for you to be approved as a SpR trainer?
- are there any local teaching/university commitments and/or the opportunity
to participate in research?
- what are the on-call commitments would you be on a sub-specialty or
generic psychiatry rota and is there middle-tier cover?
The importance of each of these details will vary for different applicants
for example, some doctors enjoy the continued challenge of training
SHOs, while others prefer the long-term support of an effective staff-grade
doctor.
Recommendation 8. While there is no such thing as a perfect job, you
may have scope for revising the proposed job plan, depending on your
experience and specialist skills.

The consultant interview
Before the interview
Preparation is essential and should include time spent making
visits
(preferably before making a formal application, to avoid
canvassing). Consider
spending time in the service, by asking
to attend team meetings and ward
rounds. If relevant, try to
find out why the last consultant left. Speak to
the key consultants
and follow up any suggested leads. The medical director
will
be able to explain how last years cost improvements were
delivered
and which aspects of the service will be reshaped
in the coming year. You
could also discuss issues relating
to the consultant contract (including the
programmed
activities). Ask the chief executive about the
trusts
vision for the next 5 years. Ask the trust representatives what
mentoring arrangements would be available if you were appointed
the
College recommends that such arrangements are identified
before the meeting of
the appointments committee (
Dean,
2003).
Do not be afraid to discuss informally why you want
the
job; others may have come to the trust for the same reasons!
Recommendation 9. Gather information about national and local trust
policies, e.g. clinical governance plan, annual reports. Individual trust
information can be accessed via
http://www.nhs.uk/england/.
Access other useful websites (e.g.
http://www.healthcarecommission.org.uk,
http://www.nice.org.uk/
and
http://www.dh.gov.uk)
and obtain papers on topical developments (e.g. appraisal) from Advances
in Psychiatric Treatment.
Practise interview techniques with your educational supervisor or any
recently appointed consultants, videotaping the sessions. You need to sound
confident and natural, but not rehearsed.
At the interview
The appointments committee usually consists of:
- the chief executive of the trust
- the medical director
- a regional consultant
- a College-approved member from the same specialty but a different trust
- a lay member (often a non-executive board member).
Additional members can include university representatives for teaching and
research, a representative from the primary care trust, a service manager and
a carers representative. Good preparation can reduce anxiety levels, as
you will have met some of these people before. Each panel member will have an
appropriate area to question. The College representative will check HST
issues, while the chief executive will be more interested in trust targets and
clinical governance issues. The medical director will need to know what the
successful candidate will offer to the trust (e.g. local service
developments), whereas the local consultant will be interested in team-working
skills. Be able to say what skills and experience you may bring to the trust,
using objective evidence from your curriculum vitae. Be aware of your
strengths and weaknesses and try to display a good understanding of current
training and service development terminology (e.g. clinical governance,
appraisal, revalidation, personal development plans).
Recommendation 10. At the end of the interview, when asked whether
you have any questions for the panel, it helps if you can comment that you
have met some of the panel members before and that they have already been
helpful in answering your questions.Why would an interview panel wish to
appoint someone who had not come to meet their possible future colleagues?
After the interview
If you are not successful, ask for a contact to obtain feedback. There may
have been a better candidate on the day or you may need to improve your
interview skills.

Conclusion
Despite the current vacancy rates of consultant psychiatrist
posts, the SpR
to consultant transition can be challenging.
By introducing a SpR
competency based curriculum,
the College has shown its
commitment to ensuring that trainees
develop the necessary skills needed to
practise as a consultant.
Offering new consultants a named mentor should also
make the
transition a smoother one.
While many regard securing a consultant post as marking the end of a long
training process that started at medical school, it is better viewed as
marking the start of another new beginning that of
lifelong continuing professional development. As Sir Winston Churchill wrote
in 1942:
This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it
is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.

References
- ALLSOPP, L., ALLEN, R., FOWLER, R., et al
(2002) Research in psychiatric higher specialist training: a
survey of specialist registrars. Psychiatric Bulletin,
26, 272
-274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- DEAN, A. (2003) Mentors for newly appointed
consultants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
9, 164-165.[Free Full Text]
- GUTHRIE, E. & BLACK, D. (1991) Choosing a research
project. British Journal of Hospital Medicine,
46, 335
-336.[Medline]
- HEARD, S. R., SCHILLER, G., AITKEN, M., et al
(2001) Continuous quality improvement: educating towards a
culture of clinical governance. Quality in Health
Care, 10 (suppl. 2), 70
-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- NEWBY, D. (2003) Personal development plans: making
them work, making them count. Advances in Psychiatric
Treatment, 9, 5
-10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- PAICE, E. & GINSBURG, R. (2003) Specialist
registrar training: what still needs to be improved? Hospital
Medicine, 64, 173
-176.[Medline]
- PETRIE, R., ANDERSON, K., HARE, E., et al
(2003) Research activity of specialist registrars.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
28, 180
-182.
- PICKERSGILL, T., ALUSI, S., HADJIKOUTIS, S., et al
(2003) Specialist registrars acting up as consultants.
BMJ, 327 (suppl. 4 Oct), s107
.
- PIDD, S. (2003) Recruiting and retaining
psychiatrists. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
9, 405-411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- RAMCHANDANI, P., CORBY, C., GUEST, L., et al
(2001) The place andpurpose of research training for specialist
registrars: a view from the Collegiate Trainees Committee (CTC) of the
Royal College of Psychiatrists. Irish Journal of Psychological
Medicine, 18, 29
-31.
- ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (2002)
Annual Census of Psychiatric Staffing 2001. Occasional Paper OP
54. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
- SMART, S. & COTTRELL, D. (2000) A survey of
training experiences and attitudes of higher specialist trainees in child and
adolescent psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin,
24, 302
-304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- STRATFORD, J. (2003) TheOut-of-Programme
Experience. Psychiatric Bulletin,
27, 112
-114.[Free Full Text]
- STRYDOM, A. & HIGGINS, N. (2004) Are dedicated
research posts of value to psychiatric trainees? Psychiatric
Bulletin, 28, 260
-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- TUNBRIDGE, M., DICKINSON, D. & SWAN, P. (2004)
Trainee psychiatrists assessment outcomes. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 28, 123
-125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- VASSILAS, C., TADROS, G. & DAY, E. (2002) The
research day: a suitable case for treatment. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 26, 313
-314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- From specialist registrar to consultant
- Alka S Ahuja
- PB Online, 13 Sep 2005
[Full text]
- From Specialist Registrar to Consultant: permission to land?
- Sujata Das
- PB Online, 20 Sep 2005
[Full text]