PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 353. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.9.353-b
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whelan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Church, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Whelan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Church, L.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 353
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

The first cohort of OSCE Part 1 candidates reaching Part 2

Paul Whelan, Specialist Registrar

University Hospital Lewisham, London, e-mail: paul.whelan{at}slam.nhs.uk

Laurence Church, Specialist Registrar

East Kent Community NHS Trust, e-mail: laurence.church{at}ekentmht.nhs.uk

In her letter (Psychiatric Bulletin, February 2005, 29,72-73) Dr Narula asked how the candidates taking the Part 2 clinical examination in May 2005 would cope? Unlike their predecessors, the current cohort has no previous experience of doing a ‘long case’ in the old-style Part 1 examination.

We are a team of specialist registrars who help run the Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ MRCPsych course. This, among other things, involves arranging mock clinical examinations. We observed that the candidates sitting the mock Part 2 examination in March 2005 struggled with the long case component. Candidates particularly had difficulties with their timing, often taking well over 10 min to present the case, and found it difficult to succinctly summarise the key features of the history of presenting complaint. The feedback we received from the candidates after the mock examination was that they were afraid to leave out what they perceived as important information from the history even if it meant going over time.

Given the increased specialisation of training posts and the changing working patterns owing to the European Working Time Directive, are candidates receiving less opportunity to take full histories from patients previously unknown to them? We recommend increased focus on basic skills during training, such as the ability to take concise but informative histories, which should be presented to supervisors during clinical work and in examination-focused teaching groups.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whelan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Church, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Whelan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Church, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals