Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 395. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.10.395-b
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 395
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Chloe Beale
East London and the City Mental Health Trust, Homerton Hospital, London
E9 6SR, email:
chloe.beale{at}elcmht.nhs.uk
Woodall et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2006,
30, 220222) describe how the introduction of nurse-led liaison
services has left senior house officers (SHOs) with little to do on call.
Senior house officers are left with routine ward work while nurses become
skilled at emergency psychiatric assessment. The original purpose of the
changes was to leave some of the simpler tasks to nurses, freeing the SHOs to
carry out work traditionally considered to require a doctor. The pendulum has
now swung too far, with specialist nurses taking over increasing amounts of
doctors work.
These changes resulted from the implementation of the European Working Time
Directive after vociferous protest by earlier generations of SHOs over poor
pay and excessive working hours. The government, for financial reasons, was
happy to heed these protests and has implemented these changes at a time when
the length of postgraduate training is being reduced by the Modernising
Medical Careers initiative.
The remedies proposed by Woodall et al are primarily bureaucratic
and will take valuable time to implement. A more prompt and practical remedy
would be for SHOs to return to where they belong, in the acute clinical front
line, alongside their specialist nursing colleagues. Evaluation of the efforts
of both, using audit systems already in place, would provide a useful
opportunity to test the fundamental and as yet unanswered question that lies
behind the current changes: do doctors have more to offer than nurses in the
assessment and management of acute psychiatric emergencies?