PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 435. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.11.435-b
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, K. R.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 435
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Boundaries for psychotherapists

Kevan R. Wylie, Consultant in Sexual Medicine and Consultant Psychiatrist

Porterbrook Clinic, 75 Osborne Road, Nether Edge, Sheffield S11 9BF, email: mail{at}porterbrookclinic.org.uk

The recent articles on the Kerr/Haslam Inquiry (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2006, 30, 204–206, 207–209) raise important issues. The experience of sexual feelings during psychotherapy and the potentially abusive nature of dual relationships are described in the literature (Pope et al, 1993; Syme, 2003). Breach of boundaries by doctors and therapists working in the field of human sexuality is relatively rare, with 98.7% of 814 UK clinicians responding to a survey having rarely or never been tempted to have sexual relations with a client (with no difference between physicians and non-physicians and no clear gender bias) (Wylie & Oakley, 2005).

Sexual and relationship psychotherapists, as members of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy, adhere to a clear code of ethics and practice, which should be openly disclosed and available to all patients under the clinicians’ care. Integrative care involving physical and psychological therapies requires clear protocols and patient guidance, including overt statements with regard to chaperone policy (Carr, 2003).

References

CARR, S.V. (2003) The intimate examination: time for a name change. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 29, 156 –159.[CrossRef][Medline]

POPE, K. S., SONNE, J. L. & HOLROYD, J. (1993) Sexual Feelings in Psychotherapy. New York: American Psychiatric Association.

SYME, G. (2003) Dual Relationships in Counselling and Psychotherapy. London: Sage.

WYLIE, K. R. & OAKLEY, K. (2005) Sexual boundaries in the relationship between clients and clinicians practising sexology in the UK. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 453 –456.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, K. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals