Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 449-451. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.12.449
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 449-451
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Availability of patient records and psychiatric admission rate
Polash Shajahan, Consultant Psychiatrist
NHS Lanarkshire, Airbles Road Centre, 49 Airbles Road, Motherwell ML1
2TP, email:
polash.shajahan1{at}lanpct.scot.nhs.uk
Timothy Agnew, Senior House Officer in Psychiatry
NHS Lanarkshire, Airbles Road Centre, Motherwell
Declaration of interest
None.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
AIMS AND METHOD
Trainee psychiatrists often perform emergency mental health assessments.
Traditionally, it has been considered that having access to past psychiatric
records will reduce the likelihood of a psychiatricatient being admitted. We
examined whether the availability of records had an influence on admission by
recording all contacts to the duty junior psychiatrist in two district general
hospitals over a 6-month period.
RESULTS
For those with chronic or enduring mental illnesses there is a 27% increase
in the likelihood of admission if past records are available. For all other
patients the increase is 10%.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Contrary to our expectations, the availability of records increases the
likelihood of admission to mental health admission units.
|
|
Introduction
|
|---|
Maintaining patient records is an essential component of good clinical care
(General Medical Council,
2001). The Scottish Executive considers avoiding admission and
providing healthcare within community settings to be an important part of
improving unscheduled care (Scottish
Executive, 2004). Mental health clinicians assume that the
availability of clinical records reduces admission to acute psychiatry units.
This is thought to be because decisions involving greater risk will be easier
when clinicians are armed with more information. Second, previous records can
reassure the assessing clinicians that the patient is not markedly different
to usual. Third, records may show alternatives to admission, such as imminent
community or out-patient contacts. Previous records are not always immediately
available to on-call clinicians for emergency assessments. We aimed to
establish whether availability of records reduces the rate of admissions to
acute psychiatry units by trainee psychiatrists.
We also considered that the lack of availability of case records may
encourage receiving doctors to rely on opinions of other professionals who
know the patient. We hypothesised that if these views were biased a doctor
might be persuaded that admission was inappropriate. Patients potentially
disadvantaged by this might include those whose secondary problems were
aggression and alcohol or substance misuse disorders.
|
|
Method
|
|---|
The ‘duty doctor logbook’ was introduced into two hospitals
within Lanarkshire in February 2003. The junior on-call psychiatrist was
instructed to note details of all calls, excluding those from the acute
in-patient psychiatric wards. The logbook was handed over to the next on-call
doctor. An example of the details recorded is given in
Fig. 1.
Referrer
Referrers were grouped into: accident and emergency department, general
practitioners, medical wards, liaison psychiatry nurses, community psychiatric
nurses (including other community mental health team staff), other wards
within the hospital, the day care facility within the hospital, other hospital
transfers (usually the result of lack of beds), and others which did not fit
into any of the above.
Problem
To allow flexibility and aid completion of the logbook, the junior
psychiatrist was allowed to record medical problems pragmatically (e.g.
‘relapse of schizophrenia’ or ‘hearing voices’) rather
than using operational diagnoses. The first recorded problem was taken for
analysis. Problems were grouped as follows.
- Alcohol problem - any mention of alcohol in the problem column, ranging
from a past history of alcohol problems or intoxication at the time of
presentation
- Substance misuse problem - any mention of substance misuse in the problem
column, ranging from a past history of substance misuse problems or
intoxication at the time of presentation
- Psychosis - any mention of the following or their variants: psychosis,
schizophrenia, delusions, hallucinations or bizarre behaviour
- Bipolar - mention of bipolar disorder, manic-depression, hypomania, mania,
flight of ideas, pressured speech or elated mood
- Anxiety/depression - terms such as anxiety, depression, low mood or
agitation
- Self-harm/overdose/suicidal - those who had either threatened to harm
themselves, thought about doing so or had self-harm as part of their referred
problem
- Aggression - those presenting in an aggressive way as perceived by the
referrer
- Confused - those who were described as confused or disorientated
- Other - the problem did not fit into any of the above.
Severe or enduring illness was then defined as any problem relating to
possible psychosis or bipolar disorder, for example, ‘hearing
voices’, ‘known patient with schizophrenia’, or ‘manic
episode’. All other patients included those with all other problems, for
example, ‘low mood’, ‘anxious’, ‘or
self-poisoning’.
To examine whether secondary problems such as aggression, or alcohol or
substance misuse influenced the likelihood of admission we examined all those
presenting with any other primary problem whose notes were unavailable.
Outcome
This was dichotomised into those who were admitted to an acute psychiatric
ward and those who were not.
Availability of records
The availability of records at the time of assessment was recorded in the
logbook.
|
|
Results
|
|---|
There were 982 contacts recorded in the logbooks during the 6 months of the
study. The availability of records was noted for 746 contacts (76%). Records
were available for 349 of 746 (47%), of whom 166 (48%) were admitted to the
psychiatric wards. Records were unavailable for 397 patients (53%); 139 of
these were admitted (35%; 
2=12.1, P=0.001). If there
was no indication of record availability the admission rate was 72 of 236
(30%). Table 1 illustrates the
breakdown for patients with severe/enduring illness versus those with other
disorders; 77 out of 88 of those patients with severe/enduring mental disorder
(87%) were admitted when notes were available compared with 38 of 64 (60%)
when the records were unavailable (2=15.9,
P<0.001).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1. Admission in relation to the availability of records in patients with
severe/enduring illness and all other patients
|
|
For all patients who did not have records available, 63 had secondary
problems of aggression, alcohol or substance misuse; 26 out of these 63 were
admitted (41%). There were 271 people with no other secondary problems
recorded and 83 out of these were admitted (30%; Fisher’s exact test,
P=0.16 (one-sided)).
|
|
Discussion
|
|---|
Contrary to our expectations, availability of case note records was
associated with increased admission rates. Although enduring illness increases
the likelihood of admission, availability of records has a similar effect: one
is more likely to encounter markers of relapse or risk, hence increasing the
probability of admission.
Comorbid secondary problems of aggression, alcohol or substance misuse did
not reduce the likelihood of admission. Although the numbers were small, these
comorbid problems increased the likelihood of admission (41 v. 30%).
We suggest that adding to the complexity of presentation with such problems
results in more difficulty in avoiding admission. Admission may allow
initiation of the management of multiple complex problems. This finding is
worthy of further investigation.
One reason for a pessimistic view of psychiatric admission is the nature of
some National Health Service psychiatric wards
(Quirk & Lelliot, 2001).
Our view is that admission to a properly staffed ward should be considered a
useful option for facilitating prompt and intensive treatment of mental
disorder. Clinicians should strive to access as much information as possible
before making decisions. One potential solution, which we are developing
locally, is to have an online version of case record correspondence. This is
available to emergency clinical staff in hospitals, community and specialist
team bases and partly solves the dilemma of where to store case records.
|
|
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank all the junior doctors who helped maintain the on-call logbooks
and Drs Anthony Pelosi and Mark Taylor for their helpful comments during the
preparation of this paper.
|
|
References
|
|---|
GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (2001) Good Medical Practice.
London: General Medical Council.
http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/library/GMP.pdfQUIRK, A. & LELLIOT, P. (2001) What do we know
about life on acute psychiatric wards in the UK? A review of the research
evidence. Social Science and Medicine,
53, 1565
–1574.
SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE (2004) Working Together
to Improve Unscheduled Care in NHS Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish
Executive.
Top
Abstract
Introduction
