|
|
|||||||||||
Correspondence |
Leeds Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust, Leeds, email: drpvikram{at}yahoo.com,
Leeds Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust, Leeds
Mason et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, September 2006, 30, 329333) described the first on-call activity of senior house officers. We have differing views about whether the first on-call psychiatrist can function as a non-resident. Medical problems in psychiatric in-patients requiring urgent attention (such as chest pain and falls) do not always necessitate transfer of the patient to a medical/accident and emergency setting. Deciding whether to transfer a patient can be difficult without proper physical examination and relevant investigations. A resident doctor would speed up this process; any delay in such situations can compromise patient care.
There are certain clinical situations (such as agitation not responding to deescalation) when a rapid response is necessary if patient and staff safety is not to be compromised. The effects of delay in such a situation are not easily measurable and Mason et al did not attempt to measure this. Hence the conclusion that there was no evidence that a resident doctor increased patient safety is not justifiable.
Serious medical emergencies requiring rapid responses are thankfully rare, but equally inevitable. Such a small-scale study raises the question of a type II error.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |