PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 468. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.12.468-b
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palanisamy, V.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Palanisamy, V.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, V.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 468
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

First on-call psychiatrist: resident or non-resident?

Vikram Palanisamy, Educational Staff Grade

Leeds Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust, Leeds, email: drpvikram{at}yahoo.com,

Vivek Agarwal, Senior House Officer

Leeds Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust, Leeds

Mason et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, September 2006, 30, 329–333) described the first on-call activity of senior house officers. We have differing views about whether the first on-call psychiatrist can function as a non-resident. Medical problems in psychiatric in-patients requiring urgent attention (such as chest pain and falls) do not always necessitate transfer of the patient to a medical/accident and emergency setting. Deciding whether to transfer a patient can be difficult without proper physical examination and relevant investigations. A resident doctor would speed up this process; any delay in such situations can compromise patient care.

There are certain clinical situations (such as agitation not responding to deescalation) when a rapid response is necessary if patient and staff safety is not to be compromised. The effects of delay in such a situation are not easily measurable and Mason et al did not attempt to measure this. Hence the conclusion that ‘there was no evidence that a resident doctor increased patient safety’ is not justifiable.

Serious medical emergencies requiring rapid responses are thankfully rare, but equally inevitable. Such a small-scale study raises the question of a type II error.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palanisamy, V.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Palanisamy, V.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals