PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 470. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.12.470
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullivan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cullivan, R.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 470
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Admission is not a failure of community care

Rachel Cullivan, Consultant Psychiatrist

St Davnet’s Hospital, Reaskey, Monaghan, Ireland, email: rachel.cullivan{at}maile.hse.ie

Dr Mackirdy gives an interesting account of the pressures leading to change within adult psychiatric services (Psychiatric Bulletin, August 2006, 30, 283–285). As a member of a community mental health team I also have noted with concern what she describes as ‘healthy competition between the sector teams to have the fewest in-patients’, which may not be so healthy if it prevents a clinically indicated admission from taking place. I would also be unhappy with the view of in-patient admission as a ‘failure of community care’. As Dr Mackirdy herself has observed, the provision of home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission has been one of the best developments of the past decade. Making an assumption that all admissions are failures of home treatment would suggest an impressive evidence base which is simply not yet available (Joy et al, 2005).

There will always be occasions when admission to a place of safety is required irrespective of the excellence of the available home treatment team (Department of Health, 2002). To view an appropriate clinical decision or indeed patient preference for admission as a failure of that service would remove any real sense of an alternative or choice for those availing of our services.

References

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (2002) Community Mental Health Teams – Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide. London: Department of Health.

JOY, C. B., ADAMS, C. E. & RICE, K. (2005) Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illness . Cochrane Library, issue 3. Chichester: Wiley InterScience.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullivan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cullivan, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals