Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 193. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.5.193-a
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 193
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
The award of Membership without examination
Peter Lepping, Consultant Psychiatrist/Honorary Lecturer
University of Wales, Llwyn-y-groes Psychiatric Unit, Wrexham Maelor
Hospital, Croesnewydd Road,Wrexham LL13 7TD,Wales, e-mail:
peter.lepping{at}new-tr.wales.nhs.uk
In his excellent article Professor Khan raises concerns regarding the
awarding of Membership of the College without adequate checks. He points
towards the Colleges high standing and its ability to guide opinion in
countries which have not yet developed such structures for themselves. The
British Medical Royal Colleges have traditionally had this role throughout
those Commonwealth countries that have largely adopted a UK-style postgraduate
education system and teach in English. This is an enormous responsibility and
at the same time reason for the Colleges dilemma. The College is not
merely the guardian of professional standards and education but also provides
professional guidance beyond its own borders. This is further complicated by
the fact that to get a job as a specialist a psychiatrist does not necessarily
have to be a member of the College, so the College has no effective role in
controlling access to work as a specialist. This latter point is in stark
contrast to Royal Colleges or similar bodies across the European Union whose
primary role it is to control access to specialist jobs. It is this complex
role with no effective control function regarding access to jobs that causes
the dilemma faced by our College and exacerbates the problems described by
Professor Khan. The answer could be to subdivide the three roles of: (a)
controlling access to specialist jobs; (b) controlling education; and (c)
setting standards and giving professional guidance at home and abroad.