Psychiatric Bulletin (2007) 31: 387-390. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.107.014555
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Outcome of acute psychiatric in-patient care where there are no crisis or home treatment teams
Polash Shajahan
Consultant Psychiatrist, NHS Lanarkshire, The Airbles Road Centre,
Motherwell ML1 2TP, email:
polash.shajahan{at}lanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk
Mark Taylor
Consultant Psychiatrist, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Springpark
Resource Centre, Glasgow
Declaration of interest
None.

Abstract
AIMS AND METHOD
To examine the pathways and outcomes of in-patient care in our locality
before crisis teams were introduced details of all emergency referrals to
psychiatry were recorded and all admissions to hospital were assessed within
24 h of admission and discharge.
RESULTS
Over a 6-month period, 88% (n=1852) of calls to the duty
psychiatrist occurred between 09.00 and 01.00 h. Referrals from accident and
emergency and general practice represented the majority of calls (80%); 40% of
patients were admitted. Highest admission rates were for patients who were
psychotic, suicidal or depressed. Admission led to improvement in all
symptoms.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
In-patient care is a valuable resource for stabilising patients who are
acutely ill. Routine monitoring of unscheduled activity can inform service
delivery.

Introduction
Recent years have seen the development of specialist crisis
and home
treatment teams for managing patients who would previously
have been admitted
for in-patient care (
Glover et al,
2006).
Despite the expansion of these community-based services,
in-patient
psychiatric care is necessary for patients who cannot be managed
safely or effectively in the community. Admission to hospital
is one of the
oldest and most frequently used interventions
in psychiatry, however,
surprisingly little has been written
about its use and outcome, although there
has been concern
about standards of in-patient care
(
Quirk & Lelliot, 2004;
Lelliot et al, 2006).
Studies of acute hospitalisation in
psychiatry have been comparisons between
forms of home treatment
or day hospital care and the treatment as
usual
of in-patient psychiatric care (for example,
Priebe et al, 2006).
To our knowledge there has been no systematic or prospective
description of
the use and outcomes of acute psychiatric in-patient
care, despite the
upheaval to the patient and cost of hospitalisation.
We note the recent
comment by Holloway (
2006) that
...
admission is construed as representing a failure of the individual
patient or the service, rather than a potentially valuable
therapeutic
option. We aimed to examine the pathways
to and therapeutic value of
in-patient care in our service
(NHS Lanarkshire), where crisis or home
treatment teams have
yet to be developed.

Method
Lanarkshire has a population of approximately 550 000 with relatively
high
deprivation ratings (
Director of Public
Health, 2005).
There are no local private psychiatry facilities
and community
mental health teams (CMHTs) are the mainstay of community care
for mental health services, and operate between 09.00 and 17.00
h without any
specialised crisis assessment or home treatment
teams. Decisions to admit are
traditionally made by the junior
on-call psychiatrist, supported by advice
from senior colleagues.
To measure psychiatric on-call activity a duty
log-book was
introduced to all three psychiatric admission units in
Lanarkshire
in February 2003. Every on-call psychiatrist was instructed
to
note down details of all referrals, excluding those from
the acute (internal)
in-patient psychiatric wards. The first
noted problem was used for analysis,
and problems were grouped
into those related to alcohol, illicit drugs,
psychosis, bipolar
disorder, anxiety/depression, self-harm or suicidal
behaviour,
aggression, confusion or other problems. The clinical outcome
of
in-patient care was examined in two acute adult in-patient
wards of one
hospital between January 2004 and March 2005.
These wards consisted of 46 beds
and ran at an average 106%
occupancy rate. Objective ratings utilised the
validated Functional
Analysis of Care Environments (FACE) instrument
(
http://www.facecode.com).
Prior training was provided to nursing staff on the use of
this scale.
Self-rating of depressive symptoms was recorded
using the Zung scale
(
Zung, 1965). Patients also
completed
a further self-assessment symptom questionnaire (copies available
from authors on request). All measures were recorded within
24 h of admission
and 24 h of discharge.
The FACE components were scored 1=no symptoms, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
and 5=very severe. The individual self-rating components examined are listed
in Table 1. The scoring
mechanism for the self-rating symptoms was 1–5, with 1 not at
all through to 5 all the time. The Zung Depression Scale
was scored using standard methodology. Ethical approval was not sought as this
work constituted service evaluation.

Results
The total number of contacts for all three hospitals was 2104
for the
6-month period, of which 51% were male. The mean age
of patients was 38.3
years for males and 40.4 years for females.
The mean percentage of patients
admitted was 39%. On average
88% of contacts occurred between 09.00 and 01.00.
There were
no significant differences between the hospitals.
The source and number of referrals were as follows (relative proportion
admitted in parentheses): general practitioners, n=606 (43%);
emergency department, n=546 (38%); physicians, n=301 (15%);
CMHTs, n=154 (73%); transfers from other hospitals, n=147
(63%); liaison psychiatry, n=57 (46%); psychiatric day hospital,
n=35 (23%), non-psychiatric wards, n=28 (14%); others,
n=149 (54%).
The problems identified were as follows: self-harm or suicidal behaviour,
n=989 (39%); anxiety or depression, n=588 (43%); psychosis,
n=443 (60%); alcohol problems, n=437 (37%); illicit drug
problem, n=103 (47%); bipolar disorder, n=95 (59%);
confusion, n=72 (31%); aggression, n=70 (41%); others,
n=136 (32%).
Of those admitted, 53% were male. The mean age of in-patients was 40 years
for males and 41 years for females. Out of 1183, 115 (9.7%) required
one-to-one special nursing observations at some point during
their admission, 524 (44%) required constant observations. The
majority (84%) were treated on a voluntary basis and the mean duration of stay
was 24.9 days.
Improvement was seen in virtually all symptoms for both self and observer
ratings, as illustrated in Table
1. The greatest percentage improvements were seen for suicidality
and depressed mood. The Spearmans correlation between self-reported and
observer (FACE) suicidal ideation was 0.48 (P
0.0001). The
correlation between self-reported and FACE depressed mood was 0.43
(P
0.0001).

Discussion
The Lanarkshire model of on-call psychiatry was
the
traditional one, where junior doctors assessed and admitted
patients
throughout the 24 h period. This model is rapidly
changing within the UK, with
a drive towards specialist community-based
teams who decide upon admission or
intensive home and/or community
treatment. In our traditional model of care,
hospital admission
occurred in 40% of emergency contacts with the on-call
doctor.
Admission was associated with improvement in all subjective
and
objective symptoms. The main reasons for being admitted
(depressed mood and
suicidality) were associated with the greatest
degree of improvement. The
improvements seen cannot necessarily
be attributed to the effects of
hospitalisation, as within
the same time period (mean duration of stay 25
days) medication
effects are also likely to occur. In this study, the single
clinical problem with the highest admission rate (60%) was
psychosis. In areas where specialist teams are
developed,
hospital admission is probably being reserved for
patients who are more
severely ill (
Commander & Disanyake,
2006).
Nevertheless, one such home treatment team found a 54%
admission
rate over 1 year for first-episode psychosis
(
Gould et al, 2006).
This was similar to the 60% admission rate for psychosis found
in this study.
Although our psychosis does not
equate to first-episode
psychosis, such a relatively high rate
for a home treatment team reflects the
fact that admission
is often necessary and unavoidable for certain conditions
to
facilitate a favourable outcome.
All three hospitals had consistent activity over time, with 9 out of 10
unscheduled contacts occurring between 09.00 and 01.00 h. Admission rates for
all unscheduled contacts between 09.00 and 17.00 h were only 10% lower when
CMHTs and senior medical staff who are familiar with the patients were
available to provide advice to on-call doctors. This has implications for the
development of home treatment or crisis services in a particular area. It is
probably unnecessary to provide such crisis cover at the same intensity
throughout the 24 h period. The availability of the CMHT or sector
psychiatrist did not seem to influence the proportion of patients admitted to
a significant degree.
The profile of our patients who were admitted was comparable to a large
database of admissions in English hospitals
(Thompson et al,
2004), although the database showed a median duration of stay of
15 days for mental illness (adult psychiatry) compared with our mean of 25
days. Again, this may be related to specific teams which facilitate early
discharge planning being available in parts of England. Thompson et
al (2004) also found that
depression and anxiety were the most commonly recorded reason for admission,
and we have shown that both patients and their treating clinicians rate
depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts as the symptoms most amenable to
improvement in the in-patient setting.
In-patient care is an expensive but essential resource for mental
healthcare. It is effective in gaining control of severe symptoms and
providing safety for patients and others. Even with the development of
specialist community teams, in-patient care cannot be replaced and will remain
as a valuable therapeutic option rather than a failure of community care.
Accreditation of in-patient mental health services is now considered a
priority (Lelliot et al,
2006). As part of this accreditation, we believe collection of
routine clinical outcome measures will be of benefit in service evaluation and
therefore delivery.

Acknowledgments
We thank G. Martin, M. Hughes and F. Shuel for their invaluable
help with
data collection and Drs M. Connolly and J. Burley
for their helpful comments
during preparation of this manuscript.

References
- COMMANDER, M. & DISANYAKE, L. (2006) Impact of
functionalised community mental health teams on inpatient care.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
30, 213
–215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2005) The Health
of the People within the Lanarkshire NHS Board Area. Annual
Report, pp. 53–56. NHS Lanarkshire.
- GLOVER, G., ARTS, G. & BABU, K. (2006) Crisis
resolution/home treatment teams and psychiatric admission rates in England.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
189, 441
–445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- GOULD, M., THEODORE, K., PILLING, S., et al
(2006) Initial treatment phase in early psychosis: can intensive
home treatment prevent admission? Psychiatric
Bulletin, 30, 243
–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- HOLLOWAY, F. (2006) Acute in-patient psychiatry:
dedicated consultants if we must but not a specialty. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 30, 402
–403.[Free Full Text]
- LELLIOT, P., BENNET, H., MCGEORGE, M., et al
(2006) Accreditation of acute in-patient mental health services.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
30, 361
–363.[Free Full Text]
- PRIEBE, S., JONES, G., MCCABE, R., et al
(2006) Effectiveness and costs of acute day hospital treatment
compared with conventional in-patient care. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 188, 243
–249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- QUIRK, A. & LELLIOTT, P. (2004) What do we know
about life on acute psychiatric wards in the UK? A review of the research
evidence. Social Science and Medicine,
53, 1565
–1574.
- THOMPSON, A., SHAW, M., HARRISON, G., et al
(2004) Patterns of hospital admission for adult psychiaitric
illness in England: analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics data.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
185, 334
–341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- ZUNG, W. (1965) A self rating depression scale.
Archives of General Psychiatry,
12, 63
–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]