PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2007) 31: 110. doi: 10.1192/pb.31.3.110a
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, D.

Correspondence

‘Do not resuscitate’ decisions – need for objective measures

David Cornelius, Staff Grade in Old Age Psychiatry

Whitchurch Hospital, Park Road, Cardiff CF14 7XB, email: davycorn{at}yahoo.com

Chakraborty & Creaney (Psychiatric Bulletin, October 2006, 30, 376–378) described the understanding of ‘do not resuscitate’ (DNR) orders among staff in continuing care psychiatric wards. Many nursing staff and many psychiatric trainees connect DNR orders not only with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) but also with the intensity of medical intervention for physical illness. Deterioration of physical health is more common than cardiac arrest on old age continuing care psychiatric wards and requires a decision on whether or not to transfer to a medical facility. In the absence of clear guidelines, the role of DNR orders is debatable.

The argument for a DNR order is clear. In advanced dementia complicated by physical debilitation, CPR is unlikely to be successful. If successful, residual brain damage worsens the prognosis, contributing to an even poorer quality of life. Such information is understood by relatives. However, reasons given for not transferring to a medical ward appear vague and at worst inhumane to relatives. A common explanation from a medical registrar on duty is that further intervention is unlikely to improve quality of life. This is viewed by many relatives as evidence of ageism in an era of scarce resources. Indeed, transferring such patients may improve their quality of life by relieving pain and discomfort caused by reversible conditions such as pneumonia, septicaemia and bowel obstruction.

Perhaps the answer lies with clear and transparent guidelines supported by objective means of measuring quality of life. Old age psychiatrists need training in palliative care so that they can justify their treatment choices in those with terminal illness.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals