|
|
|||||||||||
Beck House, 3, West Parade Road, Scarborough, North Yorkshire,YO12 5ED, email: dr.rebecca.mason{at}btinternet.com
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Ynys-y-Plant, Plantation Lane, Newtown, Powys, SY16 1JH
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, it is unclear what happens after a consultant is no longer newly appointed. Does the mentoring arrangement continue with mutual agreement or does the more senior consultant need to move on to mentor further newly appointed consultants? And what about the need for ongoing support and supervision for the more senior and experienced consultants?
It is now well established that junior doctors need supervision throughout their training. Consultants supervise junior doctors and may offer supervision to other professionals, but does the need for supervision and support stop once in the consultant grade? Do senior and experienced consultants acknowledge their need for supervision and support? How does the consultant survive once mentoring has stopped and what systems and models are available to offer this ongoing supervision and support for more senior consultants?
|
|
Support systems |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the Northern and Yorkshire regions during the mid-1990s, a doctors development and mentoring network was set up to develop mentoring training for consultants. Subsequent evaluation of the scheme showed that together with training, the consultants valued the co-mentoring and the supportive network of senior doctors that the training provided. This was particularly mentioned by several consultants who had felt isolated (Connor et al, 2000).
With the introduction of mandatory continuing professional development (CPD) peer groups, meeting with consultant peers is now a regular occurrence, at least twice a year (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2001). Although there is a clear agenda for these meetings, the format and structure of these CPD groups varies greatly, with some allowing more time for more informal peer group discussions of clinical and other issues and for support. They certainly result in a more formal, structured and peer-reviewed process and in personal development plans and CPD being verified and validated, but how much supervision and support do they provide for the isolated consultant?
|
|
Isolation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Usually, an essential and large amount of invaluable clinical discussion and support occurs between multidisciplinary team colleagues. Staff sensitivity and staff support groups are other models of support that enable teams to deal with complex mental health and emotionally powerful feelings and conflicts in their practice (Haigh, 2000). However, consultant psychiatrists may feel isolated within a multidisciplinary mental health team, and there may be conflict between the consultants roles as manager and supervisor that makes open multidisciplinary team discussion difficult. Furthermore, other issues (for example certain interpersonal ones) can arise that cannot be discussed appropriately between a consultant psychiatrist and team colleagues.
There is a continuing problem with the retention and recruitment of psychiatrists and to tackle these issues there is a need to address and decrease work-related stress, ill health and burnout (Roberts, 1997; Benbow, 1998; Allen, 1999; Egerton et al, 2005). Consultants have a responsibility to ensure that their own needs for supervision and support are met (Roberts, 1997). Although New Ways of Working for Psychiatrists (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004; Department of Health, 2005) may go some way to addressing the pressures and stresses on psychiatrists, it does not address the issue of isolation.
|
|
Telephone and peer supervision |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The potential benefits and pitfalls as well as the importance of a structure with regular review and evaluation have been described by many authors (Zorga et al, 2001; Campbell & Coombes, 2002; Counselman & Weber, 2004). For more senior practitioners/professionals and supervisors, one-to-one peer supervision may be organised (Hawkins & Shohet, 2000; Claveirole & Mathers, 2003). However, peer supervision is less commonly used by doctors, including psychiatrists (Arnott et al, 1996), nor is it described within psychiatric training.
The telephone method of supervision is normal practice for the clinical service supervision of junior doctors. It is also used for distance supervision, consultation and training of trainee counsellors, psychotherapists (Wajda-Johnston et al, 2005) and other health professionals in different settings (Thompson & Winter, 2003).
We describe a model of telephone peer supervision between two senior consultant psychiatrists that can enhance professional practice and provide essential supervision and support for the consultant in an isolated setting. We use a broad definition of supervision to include discussion of clinical cases, particularly focusing on the medical or psychiatric aspects, discussion of management issues, and reflection on our own responses to and mechanisms for coping with clinical and team issues. This will be further illustrated in the following account.
|
|
Personal experience of telephone peer supervision |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the beginning of each session we set a prioritised agenda, including the time needed for each item. Usually two or three issues would be discussed at each session and might consist of:
Although overall the experience has been positive, there have been some problems. It has been hard to entirely ring-fence the time, either because of pressure of work or feeling guilty about not using the time for patient contact. There have been some practical problems such as availability of telephone lines and confidential rooms. We also considered the effect on team members; do they see it as important that their colleague is recognising their own need for support and reflection, or is it excluding of the team that these issues are not being taken to them?
The telephone sessions have also had an effect on our pre-existing friendship. Initially the friendship gave us the feeling of safety necessary to discuss anything, but latterly the telephone sessions became our relationship and the friendship diminished.
|
|
Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our opinion, peer telephone supervision should be seen as complementary to CPD peer groups, multidisciplinary discussions, mentoring networks, use of email and email forums and other forms of supervision and support, not as a substitute. It is a practical method and we would emphasise the importance of formalising and structuring the peer supervision telephone arrangements. The supervision and support may be one factor that would help prevent burnout. Pre-existing friendship is not necessary, but the peers need to be able to trust and respect one another and communicate openly without fearing criticism or feeling threatened. Review and evaluation of the arrangement is also important and any difficulties should be addressed (Hawkins & Shohet, 2000; Counselman & Weber, 2004). It could be extended for use by consultants working in different countries or continents, particularly in the current era of cheap internet telephone communications.
We would recommend that it be considered by all consultants who need supervision and support or feel isolated, for whatever reason.
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ARNOTT, S., DORKINS, E. & AYLARD, P. (1996)
The Sorcerer and the Apprentice. A study of clinical supervision
of psychotherapy and counselling occurring in a district wide general adult
psychiatric service. Psychiatric Bulletin,
20, 609
-611.
BENBOW, S. M. (1998) Burnout: current knowledge and relevance to old age psychiatry. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 520 -526.[CrossRef][Medline]
BENBOW, S. M. & JOLLEY, D. J. (1999) Gender, isolation, work patterns and stress among old age psychiatrists. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 726 -732.[CrossRef][Medline]
CAMPBELL, G. & COOMBES, E. (2002) The benefits of peer supervision. Journal of Dementia Care, 10, 12.
CLAVEIROLE, A. & MATHERS, M. (2003) Peer supervision: an experimental scheme for nurse lecturers. Nurse Education Today, 23, 51 -57.[CrossRef][Medline]
CONNOR, M. P., BYNOE, A. G., REDFERN, N., et al (2000) Developing senior doctors as mentors: a form of continuing professional development. Report of an initiative to develop a network of senior doctors as mentors: 1994-99. Medical Education, 34, 747 -753.[CrossRef][Medline]
COUNSELMAN, E. & WEBER, R. (2004) Organizing and maintaining peer supervision groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 54, 125 -143.[CrossRef][Medline]
DEAN, A. (2002) The Role of a Mentor for Newly-Appointed Consultants. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
DEAN, A. (2003) Mentors for newly appointed
consultants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
9, 164-165.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (2005) New Ways of Working for Psychiatrists: Enhancing Effective, Person-Centred Services through New Ways of Working in Multidisciplinary and Multiagency Contexts. Department of Health.
DOSANI, S. (2006) Mentoring. BMJ Career Focus, 332, 93 -95.
EGERTON, J., SWANN, A. & FOLEY, B. (2005)
Shadowing consultant psychiatrists: the need for change.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
29, 182
-185.
ERAUT, M. (1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. Falmer Press.
HAIGH, R. (2000) Support systems. 2. Staff sensitivity
groups. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
6, 312-319.
HAWKINS, P. & SHOHET, R. (2000) Supervision in the Helping Professions (2nd edn) . Open University Press.
HOLLOWAY, F., SZMUKLER, G. & CARSON, J. (2000)
Support systems. 1. Introduction. Advances in Psychiatric
Treatment, 6, 226
-235.
HUNT,W. & ISSACHAROFF, A. (1975) History and
analysis of a leaderless group of professional therapists. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1164
-1167.
HUNTER, K. M. (1991) Doctors Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton University Press.
ROBERTS, G. A. (1997) Prevention of burn-out.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
3, 282-289.
ROBERTS, G., MOORE, B. & COLES, C. (2002)
Mentoring for newly appointed consultant psychiatrists. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 26, 106
-109.
ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (2001) Good Psychiatric Practice: CPD (Council Report CR90). Royal College of Psychiatrists.
ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (2004) Remedies for Work Overload of Consultant Psychiatrists (consultation document). Royal College of Psychiatrists.
THOMPSON, S. & WINTER, R. (2003) A telephone-led clinical supervision pilot for nurses in different settings. Professional Nurse, 18, 467 -470.
TODD, W. E. & PINE, I. (1968) Peer supervision of
individual psychotherapy. American Journal of
Psychiatry, 125, 780
-784.
WAJDA-JOHNSTON, V. A., SMYKE, A. T., NAGLE, G., et al (2005) Using technology as a training, supervision, and consultation aid. In:The Handbook of Training and Practice in Infant and Preschool Mental Health (ed. K. Moran Finello). Jossey-Bass.
WATERS, E. (2002) I felt very alone. Health Service Journal, 112, 26 .[Medline]
ZORGA, S., DEKLEVA, B. & KOBOLT, A. (2001) The process of internal evaluation as a tool for improving peer supervision. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 23, 151 -162.[CrossRef]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |