The Psychiatrist (2008) 32: 116. doi: 10.1192/pb.32.3.116
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C.

Correspondence

Is ECT patient-centred?

Caroline Cooper, Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry of Substance Misuse

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Wells Road Centre, Wells Road, Nottingham NG3 3AA, email: Caroline.Cooper{at}nottshc.nhs.uk

At times the balance between understanding patients’ experiences of ill health and the biological models of disease processes can be difficult to achieve. Most healthcare professionals recognise the importance of both the scientific theories of disease and abnormal functioning, but also of ethical issues and the subjective experience of illness. Evidence-based medicine highlights the importance of taking into account three elements: the evidence, patient particulars and patient preference (Haynes, 2002). To ignore any one of these aspects would lead to an approach to care which cannot be patient-centred.

Professor Cawley suggested that ‘psychiatry is more than a science’ (Cawley, 1993), containing an ‘undefined something extra’ in addition to its scientific knowledge and practice. Psychiatry’s concern with the uniqueness of each individual, empathy and communication with patients is ‘inevitable and everpresent’.

This is especially important for patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), who not only face the stigma of the treatment but also the potential disempowerment of such a technique, particularly in those cases where it is carried out against the wishes of the patient. The study carried out by Kershaw et al (2007) was potentially able to address this issue, but unfortunately the researchers did not report whether the patients were being treated voluntarily, nor their attitudes towards ECT before receiving treatment.

References

  1. CAWLEY, R. H. (1993) Psychiatry is more than a science. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 154 -160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. HAYNES, R. B., DEVEREAUX, P. J. & GUYATT, G. H. (2002) Physicians’ and patients’ choices in evidence-based practice. BMJ, 324, 1350.[Free Full Text]
  3. KERSHAW, K., RAYNER, L. & CHAPLIN, R. (2007) Patients’ views on the quality of care when receiving electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatric Bulletin, 31, 414 -417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C.