*Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Retford DN22 OPD, UK, email: irene.cormac{at}nottshc.nhs.uk
Nutrition and Dietetics Service, Bassetlaw Hospital, Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust, Kilton Hill, Worksop, UK
Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Psychology Department, Healthy Lifestyle Programme, Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Research and Development Department, Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
|
|
|---|
To evaluate a new integrated weight management and fitness service for long-stay psychiatric patients who were obese or overweight with physical health risks. Body size and fitness were measured before and after each 10- to 12-week programme.
RESULTS
The number of patients referred to the programme was 145;102 were accepted, 95 started a programme and 46 completed it. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. There were significant reductions in weight (P=0.001), body mass index (BMI, P=0.001) and waist size (P=0.001), and considerable improvements in hand strength (left hand, P=0.03; right hand, P=0.015), flexibility (P=0.022), lung function (P=0.001) and aerobic capacity (P=0.001).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
An integrated programme of weight management and fitness is effective in reducing body weight and waist size, and in improving physical fitness in long-stay psychiatric patients. The long-term effect on patients health and fitness needs to be monitored and strategies are needed to reduce patient withdrawal.
|
|
|---|
Obesity contributes to the increased morbidity and premature mortality already known to occur in psychiatric patients (Harris & Barraclough, 1998). Side-effects of psychotropic medication, including weight gain (Gentile, 2006), may also increase physical health risks (Ray et al, 2001; Enger et al, 2004; Joukamaa et al, 2006).
A survey at Rampton Hospital (Cormac et al, 2005) found high rates of obesity, large waist size and a mean increase of weight since admission of 10.62 kg in men and 12.74 kg in women. All patients in Rampton Hospital have complex mental health problems and many have physical comorbidities. In a high-security hospital, access to exercise is limited by restrictions on patient freedom of movement, whereas meals and snacks are provided by the hospital catering service and other food can be purchased from the patients shop.
As part of a wider initiative to improve the physical health of psychiatric patients, a weight management and fitness programme was developed at Rampton Hospital to treat patients who were obese or overweight with health risks. The programmes were delivered three times per year, for 10-12 weeks, and consisted of education on weight management and exercise sessions.
|
|
|---|
Staff
With a grant of £250 000 from the National Health Service
Modernisation Monies, we recruited hospital staff on temporary secondment and
formed a healthy lifestyle team. The team members were a healthy
lifestyle instructor (a member of staff with a catering background), three and
a half full-time equivalent fitness instructors (three technical instructors
and a half time nursing assistant), security staff, a psychology assistant and
an administrator. A consultant forensic psychiatrist (I.C.) led the team with
part-time support from a dietician (S.H.), a health promotion nurse and a
nurse manager.
Recruitment
Patients were eligible to enter a programme if they were obese or
overweight with comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension. They were
referred to the service by their clinical team who provided information about
the patients current mental state and capacity to participate. Data
were collected by the healthy lifestyle team on patients demographics,
physical and mental health, past medical history and risk factors.
Patients who agreed to join a programme underwent a structured health and fitness assessment and those accepted were offered a place on the next available programme. They were free to leave the programme at any stage.
On each programme, patients were assigned to groups according to their clinical directorate, which enabled the team to present educational material in the most effective way and to generate peer support. Attendance to at least five educational sessions was considered completion of a programme. Patients could attend subsequent programmes, with the agreement of their clinical team and the healthy lifestyle team.
Education sessions
The dietician developed the educational component and trained the healthy
lifestyle instructor, who conducted the weekly education sessions. These
provided general information on healthy eating, an introduction to nutrition
and The Balance of Good Health
(British Nutrition Foundation,
1998), with practical advice on portion size and choosing healthy
options from the hospital menu and shop. The sessions were tailored to the
intellectual abilities of the patients and motivational techniques were used,
such as personal goal setting and praise. The team also used visual and
educational aids, replica foods and sports equipment such as exercise balls
and badminton racquets.
Fitness sessions
The fitness instructors combined many types of exercises to achieve weight
loss and improve body shape, strength and flexibility. Each patient had to
take part in a weekly, 1-hour fitness session combined with a weight
management education session, plus an optional additional 1-hour fitness
session. Activities were tailored to individual patients fitness levels
and included swimming, guided walking, indoor curling, aerobics, activities
with exercise balls, circuit training, badminton and volleyball.
During fitness sessions, the instructors observed the patients closely for signs of overexertion and distress. Fitness measures were applied to assess the impact of the programme and also to provide positive feedback to the patient and to strengthen their motivation. The following measures are widely used on the general population by fitness professionals.
Outcome measures
At the beginning and end of each programme we took measurements of: body
mass index (BMI), waist size, resting heart rate, blood pressure, hand
strength (left and right hand), flexibility (using the sit-and-reach box),
peak expiratory flow, and aerobic capacity (measured with a heart-rate monitor
during a sub-maximal test on an exercise bicycle). Hand strength and
flexibility are indicators of general fitness and aerobic capacity is an
indicator of cardiovascular fitness. Weight was also measured weekly to assist
in setting goals for the patients and a mid-term fitness assessment was
offered, but these data are not reported here. Fitness assessments were not
undertaken if the patient had a significant health risk such as unstable
angina.
Analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, using
the measurements data from patients accepted on a programme for the first
time. When patients dropped out of the programme, their last results were
treated as end of evaluation results. The Wilcoxon matched pairs
signed-rank test was used and all statistical tests were two-tailed.
|
|
|---|
Where data were incomplete, the numbers of patients included in the analysis are given in brackets. This could happen for several reasons, e.g. patients declining to be measured or curtailment in assessment of those with significant physical risk factors (such as hypertension and severe obesity), where tests for aerobic capacity and lung function are contraindicated. Table 1 shows the recruitment and attrition rates for each clinical directorate.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1. Recruitment and attrition for each patient group |
The average number of the combined fitness and education sessions attended was five (s.d.=3.7, range 0-11). The average number of the separate fitness sessions attended was also five (s.d.=3.7, range 0-11).
Demographics
The mean age of patients at recruitment was 37.1 years (range 20-63) with a
slightly higher mean age in those who completed a programme (37.91 years,
range 20-63). The ethnic background of those who completed the programme was
88% White.
Comparison of before and after scores
Table 2 shows the mean
baseline scores by clinical directorate. The mean weight loss was 1.3 kg
(s.d.=2.73, range 12 kg gain to 9 kg loss) and the mean waist size reduction
was 2.0 cm (s.d.=3.73, range 8 cm gain to 8 cm loss).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2. Mean baseline measures for each patient group before a programme |
Table 3 shows the mean difference between before and after scores for all variables, also by clinical directorate, in addition to the significance level for difference for the combined patients.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 3. Difference between the means at the end of the programme and at baseline with statistical significance of change for all patients |
Many patients reported that they enjoyed the fitness sessions as well as the interactive components of the weight management education.
|
|
|---|
There were problems with adherence to the programmes, which lowered the overall effectiveness. Patients who left their programme early did not necessarily wish to be measured or have a fitness assessment. Male patients responded better to the programme than female patients who had higher rates of withdrawal. Although there are no data on the reasons for these different attitudes, female patients tend to have more complex mental health problems and are generally more obese, which may impact on recruitment and retention. Male patients with learning disability had the lowest rates of withdrawal. Further investigation is needed into gender and diagnostic category differences and whether there is seasonal variation in effectiveness of the programme. We need to establish whether the programmes are effective in the long-term and whether improvements are sustained.
This service was expensive to design, develop and run with the cost of staff salaries and the purchase of equipment. The cost was in excess of £250 000 in the first year of operation with savings of £15 000 in the second year. We did not attempt to quantify the potential savings resulting from reduced patient morbidity as a result of the programme.
We acknowledge that staff commitment, enthusiasm and training were important factors in the success of the service. We had expected that the best achievable outcome would be stabilisation of weight for most patients so the improvements in weight loss and fitness were very encouraging. Such fitness and weight management programmes could be adapted for use in the community, day-hospital and other in-patient settings to improve the physical health of a wide range of people with mental disorders and learning disability.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||