Goodmayes Hospital, Ilford, Essex
*Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, email: j.moncrieff{at}ucl.ac.uk
J.M. is co-chairperson of the Critical Psychiatry Network, a group of psychiatrists that has campaigned against the expansion of the remit of the Mental Health Act and D.K.S. is a member of this network.
|
|
|---|
To examine trends in appeals to mental health review tribunals and hospital managers panels in a hospital covering two outer London boroughs from 1997 to 2007. Data were also used to explore associations between demographic variables, including ethnicity, and the results of appeal hearings.
RESULTS
The number of detentions under Mental Health Act Sections 2, 3 and 37 rose from 203 in 1996 to 279 in 2006. The percentage of these that went to appeal increased from 34% to 81% during the same period. However, there was no observed trend in the result of the appeals. The results were not associated with gender, ethnicity, marital status, age or the section involved; 12% of appeals were successful.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The study shows rising use of the Mental Health Act over the past 10 years and an increasing volume of appeals against its use. Since appeals are no more likely to result in discharge, the increased use of the Mental Health Act is not balanced by increased rates of discharge by review hearings. The study also demonstrates the rising workload for all involved in appeal hearings.
|
|
|---|
Several studies have found greater than expected compulsory admissions among African-Caribbean patients (Owens et al, 1991). Others have shown that higher proportions of patients of African-Caribbean and Asian origin who were readmitted were detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 when compared with patients of European ethnicity (Thomas et al, 1993).
This study examined trends in the use of the Mental Health Act and rates of appeals to mental health review tribunals and hospital managers panels in a hospital covering two outer London boroughs between 1997 and 2007. We examined trends in the outcome of review hearings and associations between the outcome of hearings and demographic characteristics, including ethnicity.
|
|
|---|
The Mental Health Act office routinely collects some demographic details on patients who are detained under a section of the Act. We obtained these data for patients who were compulsorily detained during 2005 and 2006. Data on age, gender, marital status and ethnicity were also collected. These data were used to explore whether there was any factor that was associated with the results of an appeal hearing. For the purposes of this analysis, the results of the hearings were categorised dichotomously into discharged v. not discharged. We used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 15 for Windows) for the analysis, and chi-squared and t-tests were performed to examine any associations between hearing result and the demographic characteristics of the individual whom the hearing concerned. For this analysis the unit of analysis was the hearing rather than the individual patient, because some patients had more than one hearing.
Data on ethnicity were first recorded in five categories and then recoded into two categories, White and Black and minority ethnic, for the purposes of analysis. This ensured that there were adequate numbers for a chisquared test to be conducted. Most of the people in the Black and minority ethnic category were of Black African or African-Caribbean ethnicity. Similarly, marital status was coded into two categories - single v. married or in a long-term relationship - and a chi-squared analysis was performed. To examine trends, data were entered into Microsoft Excel, which was used to obtain graphs.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 1. Detentions and appeals 1997-2006.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1. Exploration of predictors of appeal results
|
|
|
|---|
Although there are several studies confirming reports of greater than expected compulsory admissions of African-Caribbean patients (Owens et al, 1991) and of patients from other ethnic minority groups (Thomas et al, 1993), our study did not reveal any association between the result of the hearing and ethnicity. Studies have shown detentions to have bimodal distribution with peaks at age 25-34 years and at over 80 years of age. In the younger age group, rates of detention were higher for men (Audini & Lelliott, 2002). In contrast, the current data showed no linear association between age and hearing result and there was no association with male gender.
The study has several limitations. It was based on local data and therefore it gives information only about local trends. Trends in other areas and national trends may differ. Numbers of people in ethnic categories other than White were small and so the power of the analysis of ethnicity was limited. Similar considerations apply to the analysis of other demographic characteristics such as marital status, since only a minority of participants in appeals were married or in a long-term relationship. Nevertheless, the study presents important indications of a rise in the use of the Mental Health Act in one area and a rising volume of appeals against the use of this statute. Since the appeals are no more likely to result in discharge, it means that the rise in the use of the Act is not balanced by increased rates of discharge by review hearings. These trends may indicate that the Mental Health Act is being applied to people who are less severely ill and therefore more likely to appeal. In other words, the Act may currently be applied in more disputable situations, possibly more often with people who maintain the capacity to understand and challenge its use. However, any such change is not reflected in the results of appeal hearings. This may indicate that the threshold for discharge by appeal hearings has risen, in the same way and possibly for the same reasons that the threshold for detentions has fallen. Another factor could be that patients, like everyone else, are increasingly aware of their legal rights. The availability of advocacy services may have facilitated this.
The study also demonstrates the growing workload for all involved in Mental Health Act appeal hearings. This workload may increase after passage of amendments to the 1983 Act, since the introduction of compulsory community treatment orders may result in greater numbers of patients being made subject to the Act. Although the introduction of crisis resolution and home treatment teams may reduce admissions, indications are that these teams do not reduce compulsory admissions to a statistically significant extent (Johnson et al, 2005).
The low rate of success of Mental Health Act appeals is not widely publicised. Patients should be informed about this before they embark on an appeal. We also need to think about whether the system is an adequate check on increasingly liberal use of psychiatric detention.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Huda Chance of success is irrelevant The Psychiatrist, April 1, 2009; 33(4): 154 - 154. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||