The Psychiatrist (2009) 33: 108-111. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.107.016949
© 2009 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Developing a policy to deal with sexual assault on psychiatric in-patient wards
Tara Lawn, Specialist Registrar in General Adult Psychiatry
*William Harvey House, St Bartholomews Hospital, 61
Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BE, UK,
email:Tara.Lawn{at}eastlondon.nhs.uk
Elizabeth Mcdonald, Consultant in Perinatal Psychiatry
East London NHS Foundation Trust, City and Hackney Centre for Mental
Health, London
Declaration of interest
None.

Abstract
Sexual harassment and assault on psychiatric wards is an ongoing
concern. A
number of incidents have been reported in the media.
This paper focuses on a
policy drafted to deal with allegations
of sexual assaultorrapeonanin-patient
psychiatric ward. We
aimed to produce a practical, easy-to-follow guide for
junior
doctors and ward staff who may face complex and possibly contentious
issues surrounding consent, capacity to consent and police
involvement.

The problem
Thomas
et al
(
1995) documented that 33% of
female in-patients
experienced unwanted sexual comments or molestation
although
the majority did not report this. Barlow & Wolfson
(
1997)
stated that 56% of women
had been pestered by men and that
8% had taken part in a sexual act against
their will. In July
2006, the National Patient Safety Agency
(
2006) produced a
report
highlighting concerns about sexual assaults on patients
in National Health
Service mental health units. The media accused
the Department of Health of
sitting on this report.
Consenting sexual activity on in-patient wards and what constitutes consent
is always going to be a controversial issue. The fact is that in-patients are
having physical relations. A study at Imperial College
(Warner et al, 2004)
found high levels of sexual activity among in-patients on acute psychiatric
wards. Thirty per cent of the patients in the sample had engaged in some form
of sexual activity. In a similar survey of chronic psychiatric patients in
British Columbia, Canada, the figure was 38% (Welch et al, 1996).
Welch et al (1996) state that chronically hospitalised patients
have a right to sexual intimacy and that staff therefore have a duty to accept
the individuals sexuality, in an empathic, non-judgemental and humane
manner. However, the hospital also has a duty to protect in-patients from
possible harm arising from sexual encounters, and that sexual harassment and
assault in any form should not be tolerated. An individuals mental
state may affect their ability to consent and, even if they do consent, they
may regret this later. How far we can enforce behaviour and protect patients
from exploitation before we encroach on freedom of expression and Human Rights
legislation is very difficult to determine.

The need for a policy
When patients are found engaging in, or report, sexual activity,
staff must
consider various factors. These include whether
or not either or both
individuals have capacity to consent
to the act, if the behaviour should be
deemed criminal and
therefore whether the police should be involved.
Capacity to consent and its fluctuating nature pose dilemmas for staff. The
spectrum from exploitation to assault needs careful consideration. Mental
illness, learning disabilities, dementia or substance misuse can cause an
imbalance of power and make a person more vulnerable to abuse or coercion and
possibly incapable of consent. A policy is needed to guide staff, especially
junior medical and nursing staff, through this process.
Subotsky (1993) recommended
putting in place policies on consenting sexual activity and the prevention of
sexual harassment and assault on in-patient wards, plus a procedure in the
event of alleged or apparent sexual assault. Following this, the Royal College
of Psychiatrists (1996) now
recommends that all centres should have policies covering both sexual
relationships and sexual harassment or abuse and that there should be
procedures for monitoring and auditing incidents and allegations.

Actions in the event of an incident
Any alleged or apparent assault should be treated as a serious
incident and
the documented procedure followed. The fact that
it occurred on a psychiatric
ward must not alter how it is
dealt with and it could be argued that, given
our duty of care
to protect people who are vulnerable, staff may need to take
the lead in pursuing police involvement. Staff need be very
careful not to
dismiss accusations or reports as delusions,
exaggerations or deliberate
untruths and to bear in mind that
an assault may involve two patients or a
member of staff and
a patient.
In the event of a patient reporting an assault, staff having suspicions or
someone witnessing an untoward incident, a senior member of the nursing staff
and a doctor should be contacted. The most senior doctor and nurse present
should be responsible for implementing the policy.
Any physical injuries and ongoing risks to the victim, other patients or
members of staff need immediate attention. As obvious as it may seem, staff
and patients may need reminding that sexual assault and rape are crimes and
need to be reported to the police. In most circumstances, it would be
inappropriate for the psychiatric doctor to perform a sexual assault
examination; a forensic medical examiner or a gynaecologist with experience of
forensic issues should do this.
If there is any likelihood that the police may be involved, the area needs
to be cordoned off, as it may become a crime scene, and both patients advised
not to shower or bath. The interviewing needs to be sensitive at the same time
trying to ascertain some basic facts. The alleged perpetrator needs to be
informed of the allegation and given an opportunity to explain their version
of events. It should be explained to them that the police might be
involved.
Locally, we are lucky enough to have access to The Haven,
which provides medical, forensic and psychosocial support for victims of
sexual assault. More information on national sexual assault referral centres
is on the Metropolitan police website
(www.met.police.uk/sapphire).
The risks of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases also need
addressing. Our local primary health care trust have provided us with
prescribing information and a proforma for post-coital contraception to be
used by junior doctors. This is to avoid any delay in prescribing. Post-coital
contraception is a safe and effective intervention that should be offered as
soon as possible after a sexual assault to reduce the risk of pregnancy. The
hormonal method is widely available through nurse-led clinics and pharmacies
and has very few contraindications, so doctors from all specialties should be
able to prescribe it. Advice on prophylactic antibiotics should be taken from
the local Department of Sexual Health or sexual assault referral centre.

Determining capacity, consent and fitness to be interviewed
Careful clinical assessment of the persons mental state
is essential
to ascertain whether there is a disorder of attention,
memory, language,
thought form, thought content, perception,
mood or control that is
severe enough to render
the individual incapable of consent to
activity or responsible
behaviour (Welch
et al, 1996).
The Royal College of Psychiatrists
(1996) highlights the paucity
of research into assessment of capacity to consent to sexual activity in
contrast to consent to medical treatment. Abuse ranges from exploitation to
overt assault and an imbalance of power in a relationship interferes with the
ability to consent (e.g. staff - patient or a relationship involving an adult
with severe mental illness or learning disability). Capacity to consent is
dynamic and specific to the alleged offence.
With regard to the alleged perpetrator, Bayney et al (2003) draw
attention to the fact that in some instances mentally disordered offenders do
have responsibility for their criminal behaviour, since they have an
understanding of what is right and what is wrong and they can exercise choice
in their decisions. This may need to be brought to the attention of the police
and possibly members of staff. The patients consultant should prepare a
report on the alleged offender and the offence to aid the police.

Incident documentation
Adequate documentation and reporting is paramount. Cole
et al
(
2003) highlighted the
inadequate recording of data in the
event of sexual assaults and suggested
that a number of factors
led to this outcome. These included the fact that
staff may
be habituated to sexually aggressive behaviour by patients so
that
the behaviour does not provoke the same level of outrage
that would be
expected when perpetuated against less stigmatised
individuals
(
Thomas et al, 1995).
Other factors were staff
attitudes to both the victim and perpetrator and
either the
victim or staff not wanting to pursue the legal path.
Cole et al (2003)
made the recommendation that (as a minimum) an incident form should be
completed, the assault mentioned in discharge summary, the assailant named and
the assault reported to a line manager. Further suggestions in that paper
included the development of a special incident form for sexual assaults that
could be reviewed and audited and also that repeated allegations against the
same person must be brought to the attention of their consultant.

Our policy implementation
Policies obviously help guide staff but it was felt that, in
addition, a
flow chart and guidance on judging consent would
help more junior members of
the team take appropriate action
immediately. New policies need to be approved
by the trust
and then disseminated to clinical members of staff. Initial
training of senior staff (matrons, lead nurses, team managers)
will follow and
then training of other staff can be undertaken.
The policy will also need
auditing. Specific trust staff should
be assigned to each of these roles. Our
policy is awaiting
formal implementation by the trust but is currently being
used
as a proforma by the Health, Safety and Security Nurse Manager
(
Fig. 1 and
Box 1).
| Box 1. Alleged/suspected sexual assault
The following is provided as guidance with the flow chart.
Testing capacity
(After Home Office (2000)
proposals and Royal College of Psychiatrists
(2001) response.)
- Did the alleged victim understand the nature of the act, e.g.
penetration?
- Did they understand they had the right to say no?
- Had the person concerned understood the benefits and risks of such a course
of action, e.g. that it should be pleasurable but can carry the risk of
sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) or pregnancy and the ramifications of
these?
- Was the person able to balance these factors and communicate their
wishes?
- Were they free from duress (threats or inducement)?
- Does their mental disability mean they are more easily threatened or
induced to engage in behaviour that they normally would not have done?
If the answer to any of the above questions 1 to 5 is no or
the answer to question 6 is yes, the person concerned may have
lacked capacity to consent to the activity
Fitness to be interviewed
Fitness to be interviewed by the police needs to be assessed for both the
alleged perpetrator and victim (Gudjonsson
et al, 2000; Bayney et al, 2003).
- Do they understand the police caution? (perpetrator only)
- Are they fully orientated?
- Do they recognise key persons?
- Do they understand the consequences of their answers and actions?
- Could their answers be misconstrued?
- Would conducting the interview worsen any existing physical or mental
illness?
- Could anything they say or do be considered unreliable in a subsequent
court hearing?
|

References
- BARLOW, F. & WOLFSON, P. (1997) Safety and
security: a survey of female psychiatric in-patients. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 21, 270
-272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- BAYNEY, R. & IKKOS, G. (2003) Managing criminal
acts on the psychiatric ward: understanding the police view.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
9, 359-367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- COLE, M. (2003) Sexual assaults in psychiatric
in-patient units - the importance of a consistent approach.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
27, 25-28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- COLE, M., BALDWIN, D. & THOMAS, P. (2003) Sexual
assault on wards: staff actions and reactions. International
Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice,
7, 239-242.[CrossRef]
- GUDJONSSON, G. H., HAYES, G. D. & ROWLANDS, P.
(2000) Fitness to be interviewed and psychological vulnerability:
the views of doctors, lawyers and police officers. Journal of
Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 74
-92.[CrossRef]
- HOME OFFICE (2000) Setting the Boundaries:
Reforming the Law on Sex Offences. Home Office Communication
Directorate.
- NATIONAL PATIENT SAFETY AGENCY (2006) With
Safety in Mind: Mental Health Services and Patient Safety. Patient Safety
Observatory Report 2/July 2006. National Patient Safety
Agency.
- ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (1996)
Sexual Abuse and Harassment in Psychiatric Settings.
Royal College of Psychiatrists.
- ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (2001)
Response: Setting the Boundaries; Reforming the Law on Sex
Offences. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
- SUBOTSKY, F. (1993) Sexual abuse in psychiatric
hospitals: developing policies to aid prevention. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 17, 274
-276.[Free Full Text]
- THOMAS, C., BARTLETT, A. & MEZEY, G. C. (1995) The
extent and effects of violence among psychiatric in-patients.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
19, 600
-604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- WARNER, J., PITTS, N., CRAWFORD, M. J., et al
(2004) Sexual activity among patients in psychiatric hospital
wards. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
97, 477
-479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- WELCH, S. J. & CLEMENTS, G. W. (1996) Development
of a policy on sexuality for hospitalized chronic psychiatric patients.
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,
41, 273
-279.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Chiu and J. Rutherford
Dealing with transphobic harassment: the experience of a transsexual in-patient
The Psychiatrist,
July 1, 2009;
33(7):
275 - 275.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- A policy to deal with sexual assault on psychiatric in-patient wards.
- Daphne R D Wallace
- The Psychiatrist Online, 20 Mar 2009
[Full text]
- Dealing with transphobic harassment: the experience of a transsexual inpatient
- Janet Chiu, et al.
- The Psychiatrist Online, 1 Apr 2009
[Full text]