Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T06:11:45.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Child Psychiatry: White Elephant, Scotch Mist, or Medicine?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

David C. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Jesson House, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester M17 1FG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

My jokey title, like most jokes, incorporates a serious truth. The truth is that, despite the apparent clinical expansion and academic wellbeing of our subject, the experience of being in a senior position within it is that it is under threat as a medical enterprise. The sense of threat is felt mostly from the stagnation of the retrenchment in the physical and human resources needed to mount a real service, although I grant that consultant numbers have increased. Management will opt for the least costly alternative when they are presented with a broad range of advice of apparently equivalent worth which is available from various professionals within the subject. Indeed, given the degrees of diversity of views that exist, managers might at times wonder what it is that purports to be the subject. It is not difficult for child psychiatry to achieve a negative image within health management since a number of negative stereotypes naturally accrete around people with serious problems of living and coping, or developmental failure, mental impairment, or chronic sickness. Combined with small size, often a single representative in a District, and dealing with small people who suffer lack of political clout, the management case for neglect of child psychiatry when faced by harsh choices may be overwhelming. Further, child psychiatry arose from a triune of social work, psychology and psychiatry and their quite proper individual professionalisation has afforded the possibility of splitting, not only as among psychiatrists but between psychiatrists and other professionals. In the current political climate and faced with resource shortages those splits are likely to accentuate in ways which leave managers rather than practitioners in control.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988

References

1 Walk, A. (1964) The pre-history of child psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 754767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Beers, C. (1908) The Mind that Found Itself. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
3 Winnicott, D. W. (1931) Clinical Notes on Disorders of Childhood. London: W. M. Heinemann (Medical Books).Google Scholar
4 Kanner, L. (1935) Child Psychiatry. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
5 Hall, G. S. (1904) Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relation to Physiology, Antropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
6 Healy, W. & Bonner, A. (1926) Delinquents and Criminals: Their Making and Unmaking: Studies in Two American Cities. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
7 Aichorn, A. (1935) Wayward Youth. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
8 Higgs, J. F., Rivlin, E. & Taylor, D. C. (1985) 17/7 Translocation trisomy: practical vindication of a model of sickness. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 60, 748751.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.