Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:34:46.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A state of insubordination and mutiny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

A. D. M. Douglas  and
E. G. Oram
A. D. M. Douglas
Affiliation:
Nottingham
E. G. Oram
Affiliation:
Nottingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A strike involving nursing staff prior to the 1948 National Health Service Act was almost an unheard of event. In 1922 nurses at Saxondale, an 800 bedded mental hospital at Radcliffe-on-Trent near Nottingham, staged what was termed a “sit in strike” lasting four days for refusing to work a 66 hour week and accept a wage reduction as ordered by the employing authority.

Type
Sketches from the history of psychiatry
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , May 1990 , pp. 302 - 305
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1989

References

Carpenter, M. (1988) Working for Health. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Cronin, J. E. (1979) Industrial Conflict in Modern Britain. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
MS held by Notts County Archivist.Google Scholar
Nottingham Journal (1922) 15 April.Google Scholar
Priestland, P., (ed.) (1989) Radcliffe-on-Trent: A Study of a Village. Radcliffe-on-Trent: Ashbracken.Google Scholar
Quick, B. Personal communication (COHSE).Google Scholar
Stagner, R. & Rosen, H. (1968) Psychology of Union Management Relations. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.