Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T18:10:57.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the use of log books in the training of psychiatrists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrew Cole
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
Jan Scott
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is an increasing interest in the role of audit in medical practice. Less emphasis has been placed on audit by trainees and it has traditionally involved the use of log books or case books for examination purposes. One type of log book simply lists the diagnoses of consecutive cases seen. Such a record is used in the Viva part of the Examination for Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Another form of log book, often referred to as a case book, usually involves a more detailed account of the cases seen by the trainee. Case books form part of the Examination for Membership of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology as well as the MRANZCP and Canadian Psychiatric Examination.

Type
Training Matters
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1991

References

Stein, S. (1986) Psychiatry Training in the USA. Talk to the Psychiatric Tutors Conference, York, September 1986.Google Scholar
Working Party for Review of the MRCPsych (1985) Report to the Court of Electors. (Royal College of Psychiatrists).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.