Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T22:16:36.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumer audit of psychiatric training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sara Cunningham
Affiliation:
Scott Clinic, Liverpool L35 4PQ
Carmelo Aquilina
Affiliation:
Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 8JL
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Postgraduate psychiatric training is usually assessed by regular College visits. A number of training schemes, including the Liverpool training scheme, also scrutinise their training independently of the College. As far as we know, trainees as the ‘consumers’ of training have never assessed its quality themselves. The following account deals with two such audits in the Mersey region organised under the mantle of the Association of Liverpool Psychiatrists in Training (ALPIT).

Type
Training matters
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 1993

References

Birchall, E. & Higgins, J. (1991) Outcome of training – the Liverpool training scheme. Psychiatric Bulletin, 15, 357359.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1990) Statement on approval of training schemes for general professional training for the MRCPsych. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14, 110117.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.