Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T00:55:02.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of psychiatry in genetic prediction programmes for Huntington's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

G. E. Berrios
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital (Box 189), Hills Road, Cambridge
I. S. Marková
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital (Box 189), Hills Road, Cambridge
R. Gimbrett
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital (Box 189), Hills Road, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Psychiatrists are becoming increasingly involved in the assessment of candidates for genetic testing for Huntington's disease (HD) in which their role ranges from diagnosing conventional psychiatric disorder to identifying ‘new odd behaviours'. They are also expected to predict dysfunctional response to test results (e.g. self-harm). This paper describes the psychiatric component of the Cambridge HD Clinic and its assessment protocols. Practical concepts, useful to the understanding of the clinical problems that may be encountered, are also discussed.

Type
Original Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1995

References

Berrios, G. E. & Samuel, C. (1987) Affective disorder in the neurological patient Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 173176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evers-Kiebooms, G., Cassiman, J. J. & Van der Bergue, H. (1987) Attitudes towards predictive testing in Huntington's disease: a recent survey in Belgium. Journal of Medical Genetics, 24, 275279.Google Scholar
Folstein, S. E. (1989) Huntington's Disease. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, W. & Ban, T. A. (1982) The AMDP system. Manual for the Assessment and Documentation of Psychopathology. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, P. S., (ed) (1991) Huntington's Disease. London: Saunders.Google Scholar
Kessler, S., Field, T., Worth, L. & Mosbarger, H. (1987) Attitudes of persons at risk for Huntington disease towards predictive testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 26, 259270.Google Scholar
Martindale, B. (1987) Huntington's chorea. Some psychodynamics seen in those at risk and in the responses of the helping professions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 319323.Google Scholar
Mastromauro, C., Myers, R. H., & Berkman, B. (1987) Attitudes toward presymptomatic testing in Huntington Disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 26, 271282.Google Scholar
Meissen, G. J. & Berchek, R. L. (1987) Intended use of predictive testing by those at risk for Huntington Disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 26, 283293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roccatagliata, G. (1979) Psicosi e Corea di Huntington. Pisa, Pacini Editore.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. W. (1987) Testing for the Huntington gene. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 26, 243246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smurl, J. F. & Weaver, D.D. (1987) Presymptomatic testing for Huntington chorea. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 26, 247257.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., Ball, D. & Craufurd, D. (1992) Presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease in the United Kingdom. British Medical Journal 304, 15931596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, D. C. & Seller, A. (1993) A clinico-genetic study of psychiatric disorder in Huntington's chorea. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplement 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.