Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:53:33.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment and certification of neurosurgery for mental disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

G. E. Langley*
Affiliation:
Hanningfields, Warborough Hill Kenton, Exeter, Devon EX6 8LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The views expressed are based on experiences of a second opinion appointed doctor and refer to neurosurgery for mental disorder. Here the general issues are sharpened by the necessity to certify informed consent and the likelihood of the alleviation or the prevention of deterioration. In an age of evidence-based medicine the criteria by which these issues are judged are critical and need to be generally agreed. The evidence needed in clinical reports and in certification is considered from theoretical and practical viewpoints and suggestions are made in reference to treatment at both new and established centres.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Bridges, P. K., Bartlett, J. R., Hale, A. S., et al (1994) Psychosurgery: stereotactic subcaudate tractotomy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 599611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crag Working Group on Mental Illness (1996) Neurosurgery for Mental Disorder. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office. HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1990) The Care Programme Approach, HC(90)23/LASSL(90)11. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Eyspach, E., Lefering, R., Kum, C. K., et al (1995) Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred. British Medical Journal 311, 619620.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. (1997) Neurosurgery for mental disorder in the UK. Psychiatric Bulletin, 21, 6769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, R. M. (1988) Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum in professional judgement. In Professional Judgement (eds Dowie, J. & Elstein, A.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (1980) Anxiety and Emotions: Physiological Basis and Treatment, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Walter, C. J. S., Mitchell-Heggs, N., et al (1972) Modified leucotomy assessed clinically, physiologically, and psychologically at six weeks and eighteen months. British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magee, B. (1986) Popper. London: Fontana Modern Masters, Collins.Google Scholar
Mindus, P., Rasmussen, S. A. & Lindquist, C. (1994) Neurosurgical treatment for refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder: implications for understanding frrontal lobe function. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosicences, 6, 467477.Google ScholarPubMed
Robin, A. A. (1958a) A controlled study of the effects of leucotomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 21, 262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robin, A. A. (1958b) A retrospective controlled study of leucotomy in schizophrenia and affective disorders. Journal of Mental Science, 104, 1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robin, A. A. & Macdonald, D. (1975) Lessons of Leucotomy, Monographs in Controlled Studies. London: Henry Kimpton.Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., Tanner, M. & Dent, J. (1996) Evidence-based psychiatry: pride and prejudice, Psychiatric Bulletin, 20, 705707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.