Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T12:55:10.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Training and supervision of deliberate self-harm assessments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Simon Taylor
Simon Taylor*
Affiliation:
Community Health Sheffield, Whiteley Wood Clinic, Woofindin Road, Sheffield S10 3TL
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over a decade has now elapsed since the last national guidelines from Government health departments about the management of deliberate self-harm, although the scale of the problem has remained unchanged. Three years ago the Royal College of Psychiatrists issued a consensus statement which set standards for suitability of staff, particularly with regard to training, experience and supervision, the available facilities for assessment, the range of appropriate management options, communication of these and management of services. This postal questionnaire study in one health region of England of all senior house officers and registrars working in psychiatry found that levels of training and supervision varied widely and often fell below those suggested.

Type
Trainees' forum
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 22 , Issue 8 , August 1998 , pp. 510 - 512
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Bancroft, J. & Marsack, P. (1977) The repetitiveness of self-poisoning and self-injury. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 394–399.Google Scholar
Black, D. & Creed, F. (1988) Assessment of self-poisoning patients by psychiatrists and junior medical staff. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 81, 97–99.Google Scholar
Butterworth, E. & O'Grady, T. J. (1989) Trends in the assessment of cases of deliberate self-harm. Health Trends, 21, 61.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1994) Key Area Handbook: Mental Illness, 2nd edn. London: Department of Health and Social Security.Google Scholar
Fuller, G., Rea, A. J., Payne, J. F., et al (1989) Parasuicide in central London. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 82, 653–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawton, K. & Fagg, J. (1988) Suicide and other causes of death, following attempted suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 359–366.Google Scholar
Hawton, K. & Fagg, J. (1992) Trends in deliberate self poisoning and self injury in Oxford, 1976–1990. British Medical Journal 304, 1409–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herriot, P., Bhui, K. & Lelliott, P. (1994) Supervision of trainees. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 474–476.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. & Kreitman, N. (1973) An epidemiological survey of parasuicide (attempted suicide) in general practice. British Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 23–34.Google Scholar
Owens, D. (1990) Self-harm patients not admitted to hospital. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 24, 281–283.Google Scholar
Owens, D. & House, A. (1994) General hospital services for deliberate self-harm. Haphazard clinical provision, little research, no central strategy. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 24, 281–283.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1994) The General Hospital Management of Adult Deliberate Self-Harm: A Consensus Statement on Standards for Service Provision (Council Report CR32). London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Taylor, S., Kingdon, D. & Jenkins, R. (1997) How are nations trying to prevent suicide? An analysis of national suicide prevention strategies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 95, 457–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.