Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:06:28.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enough of the sticks, what about some carrots?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sian Llewellyn-Jones
Affiliation:
Swansea National Health Service Trust, Cefn Coed Hospital, Waunarlwydd Road, Swansea SA2 0GH
Sally Cubbin
Affiliation:
Swansea National Health Service Trust, Cefn Coed Hospital, Waunarlwydd Road, Swansea SA2 0GH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2000, The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Sir: Palmer & Lelliott describe some important aspects of guideline implementation (Psychiatric Bulletin, March 2000, 24, 90-93). Encouraging doctors to change their practice is a difficult task. Examples of published audits confirm this (Reference Duffet and LelliottDuffet & Lelliott, 1998).

As well as considering vigorous strategies for implementing change, we wonder if more emphasis should be placed on provision of reward systems for guideline compliance. Doctors prefer to rely on clinical experience for their decision-making (Reference Dickson-MulingaDickson-Mulinga, 1998). In contrast, guidelines can be viewed as sinister threats to this professional autonomy. Clinical experience follows an operant learning model. ‘Good’ clinical decisions are rewarded by patient improvement. ‘Poor’ clinical decisions are so labelled because they result in patient deterioration. The perceived reward for following guidelines must be greater than the integral reward predictable from a good ‘clinical experience’-based decision.

General practitioners receive financial incentives for reaching targets for preventative medicine interventions. If a change in practice is perceived as an increased workload, financial compensation can soften the blow. Rewarding high quality practice makes sense. Although this may add to the unit price of change, this system may prove cost effective. Further research evaluation may be indicated, of course. Producing and disseminating guidelines that nobody reads or follows, is surely an ultimate waste of time and money.

References

Dickson-Mulinga, J. (1998) Rationale behind psychiatrists' choice of drug. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 677680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffet, R. & Lelliott, P. (1998) Auditing electroconvulsive therapy. The third cycle. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 401405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.