Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T15:41:32.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

[No Title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Aiden Corvin
Affiliation:
e-mail: acorvin@tcd.ie
Edmond O'Mahony
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8; e-mail: omahonep@tcd.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2001, The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Sir: Kotak & Butler (Psychiatric Bulletin, January 2001, 25, 31-32) highlighted the importance of computers for psychiatrists in training. We share their disappointment that half of senior house officers and three-quarters of specialist registrars described having access to computers, and that, of these only one-quarter had internet access.

We have recently conducted a survey of psychiatric trainee attitudes in the Eastern region of the Republic of Ireland (n=153) in which we found that only 67% of respondents ever used a computer at work. Access in the workplace to the internet is higher than in the London sample (54%), but this figure and associated e-mail availability (29%) appear disappointingly low.

The College recognises the importance of trainee involvement in research (Psychiatric Bulletin 1994, 18, 514-524), an area where computer access and skills are now essential. Perhaps it is not surprising that we found that those trainees in our sample who had access to a computer or to the internet at work were more likely to be actively involved in research. Kotak & Butler have reported a demand among junior doctors for greater access to computers and the College recommends facilities for ‘hands on’ computerised literature searching for all trainees (Psychiatric Bulletin, 1994, 18, 514-524). Access is only half the point, in our sample only 71% of respondents rated their computer literacy as ‘fair’ or better; given the perceived demand and obvious potential benefits, should education in psychiatry include information technology training?

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.