Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:43:17.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report of the Overseas Working Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2002. The Royal College of Psychiatrists

The Working Group was established in June 1999 with a remit “to advise Council on the international role of the College: what contributions the College should (and should not) try to make in the next decade to the development of psychiatry and the training of psychiatrists outside the UK and Ireland, and what resources it would be reasonable to devote to these objectives”. Its membership consisted of: Dr M. Abou-Saleh, Dr D. Bhugra, Dame Fiona Caldicott, Mrs V. Cameron, Dr J. Henderson, Dr R. Jenkins, Dr R. Kendell (chairman) and Professor J. Watson. The group met on six occasions and took evidence from over 20 people, including several overseas Fellows.

The main conclusions and recommendations of the working group were that:

  1. The Overseas Liaison Committee should be replaced by a new International Affairs Committee.

  2. This committee and the College Council should monitor total expenditure on overseas affairs.

  3. Members and Fellows in low income countries should be offered reduced subscriptions, using the World Bank's four tiered classification.

  4. In future, the College's most important role in the training of psychiatrists from overseas should be to help psychiatrists who have already obtained a general training locally to obtain higher or speciality training in the UK.

  5. The Child and Adolescent Faculty should be invited to set up a working group of its own to consider how it might help developing countries to acquire basic skills in its discipline.

  6. The Research Committee should be invited to consider how it might help psychiatrists in developing countries to acquire basic clinical and epidemiological research skills.

  7. The College should not attempt to hold its Membership examination outside the British Isles.

  8. The College should not enrol psychiatrists working outside the British Isles into its continuing professional development programmes.

  9. The College should try hard to establish closer links with psychiatrists in other European countries. In the long run the most effective way of achieving this is to persuade, and help, some able British trainees to obtain part of their training in a continental European country.

  10. College meetings overseas and joint meetings with other national and international psychiatric associations can be an effective way of raising the College's international profile.

  11. Overseas groups should be provided with some tangible resources.

  12. The status of Affiliate should be available to psychiatrists who are not resident in the British Isles.

  13. Psychiatric Bulletin should regularly contain a section devoted to overseas news and activities.

  14. The regulations governing the Kenneth Rawnsley Travelling Fellowship should be amended.

The response of the Court of Electors and Council to the individual recommendations appears in italicised print after each recommendation in the main report. With the exception of the two italic bullet points above, the recommendations were supported and are being taken forward within the College.

The full report is available from the College's Book Sales Office, tel: 020 7235 2351 ext. 146.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.