Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:40:39.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can deception be therapeutic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ernest Gralton
Affiliation:
St Andrew's Hospital, Northampton
John J. Sandford
Affiliation:
Llanarth Court Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2002

Sir: We are gratified that the case we described (Sandford et al, Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2001, 25, 206-280) stimulated such interest and controversy. However, much of Dr Adshead's commentary (Psychiatric Bulletin, October 2001, 25, 374-375) related to the general issue of deceiving patients and failed to take into account the particular features of the case that made it exceptional.

First, the case was not ‘ordinary’ insofar as we were dealing with a person with a pervasive developmental disorder whose communication and cognitive difficulties lay at the heart of this dilemma. Adshead wonders if it had been possible to talk to the patient about moving over a long period. As we described, the many previous attempts to do this had caused extreme anxiety that had precipitated assaultative behaviour and led to the potential placements falling through. Adshead appears to assume that the communication issues for our patient were the same as for the non-autistic majority, unfortunately this is not supported by the research evidence.

Second, Adshead was incorrect to describe this as a forensic case; the patient was detained under a civil section and had been for many years inappropriately placed in a forensic facility, hence the impetus to move her into an autistic friendly environment.

Third, again as detailed in the case, her suspicions around the time issue are unfounded, planning around the move took many months of careful negotiation. Fourth, at no point was false information given to the patient (i.e. the patient was not told a lie), we rather withheld information. Last, the concept of human dignity is now widely used in a variety of complex bioethical debates from care of children with behavioural disorders through palliative care to the patenting of DNA and xenotransplantation.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.