Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:41:09.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental health presentations to an inner-city accident and emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

S. Cassar
Affiliation:
Department of Liaison Psychiatry, Guy's, King's & St Thomas' Medical & Dental School, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH
A. Hodgkiss
Affiliation:
Department of Liaison Psychiatry, Guy's, King's & St Thomas' Medical & Dental School, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH
A. Ramirez
Affiliation:
Department of Liaison Psychiatry, Guy's, King's & St Thomas' Medical & Dental School, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH
D. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Accidents Emergency Medicine, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals Trust
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

AIMS AND METHOD

To study the presentation, assessment and management of all patients attending St Thomas' accident and emergency (A&E) department with overt mental health problems. The method included a pragmatic definition of ‘overt mental health problems' and a range of strategies to maximise case ascertainment.

RESULTS

The department saw 565 presentations in a 3-month period. Patients were predominantly young, male, single, unemployed, housed outside the area served by the local primary care group and presented outside normal working hours.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study confirms that A&E departments may be the most frequently used setting for urgent mental health assessments in central London. The patients attending differ from those using community mental health teams. It is argued that mental health liaison services based in inner-city A&E departments should be developed.

Type
Original Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2002

Accident and emergency (A&E) departments are the most frequently used facility for urgent mental health assessments both within and outside office hours (Reference Johnson and ThornicroftJohnson & Thornicroft, 1995). This finding holds even where well-established community mental health teams (CMHTs) are available locally (Reference Crawford and KohenCrawford & Kohen, 1997). Yet the recent King's Fund Report, London's Mental Health (Reference Johnson, Ramsay and ThornicroftJohnson et al, 1997), made no reference to the role of A&E departments in service provision. The National Service Framework for Mental Health (Department of Health, 1999) demands 24-hour access to mental health services and acknowledges that A&E departments have a role in this, but downplays their centrality to current patterns of mental health care in London. Psychiatric practice in the A&E department has been unpopular with patients, carers and professionals and has remained underresearched. We studied activity in one A&E department as a baseline for service development and further research.

Method

We undertook a prospective descriptive study of the presentation, assessment and management of all patients with overt mental health problems attending the A&E department at St Thomas' Hospital, London, over a 3-month period. Overt mental health problems included psychiatric morbidity noted by a health professional as the main cause for presentation, or a patient request for psychiatric help or deliberate self-harm (DSH) presentations. The latter were included because they require a psychosocial assessment. Overt psychiatric presentations were ascertained by hand searching clinical notes daily, liaising with mental health professionals active in the department and searching the A&E departmental computer. A form was completed by S.C. for each patient. This covered socio-demographic data, presenting problems, past psychiatric history (including service contact) and information on pathways of care in the A&E department.

Results

There were 565 attendances with overt psychiatric problems in the period October to December 1997. The patients were predominantly young (mean age 33), male (64%), single (56%) and unemployed (53%). Only 43% had home addresses within the area served by the local health authority (now primary care group), with 17% of patients describing themselves as of no fixed abode. The most frequent presenting problems were DSH (31%), substance misuse (mostly alcohol) (20%), psychosis (17%) and mood disturbance (15%). Fifty-eight per cent of patients declared a past history of mental health problems, with DSH, depressive illness and schizophrenia being the most common. Over a third of patients were in contact with mental health services elsewhere at the time of A&E attendance.

Seventy per cent of these presentations were outside the office hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday to Friday. Four per cent of patients left unassessed and 82% were assessed by a mental health professional in A&E. Thirty per cent of presentations resulted in hospital admission — 20% to psychiatric units and 10% to general wards (typically with self-harm or delirium tremens). Further care for the other patients included general practitioner (GP) follow-up (15%), no follow-up (12%) and referral to CMHTs (14%), drug and alcohol services (9%) and social workers (0.5%).

Comment

A&E departments in inner-cities play an important role in the management of mental health problems. They especially serve young men who are single, unemployed and often homeless, who present outside office hours and among whom there is an epidemic of completed suicide (Reference Hawton and FaggHawton & Fagg, 1992). The prevailing ideology has been that enhanced community mental health services will reduce presentations to A&E departments. However, it is clear that community teams serve a very different population to A&E departments, being specifically aimed at those with severe, enduring mental illness and permanent residence in a catchment area.

The department studied here had the benefit of two mental health nurses based in A&E and continuous junior and senior psychiatric cover. This probably explains the relatively high percentage of specialist mental health assessments undertaken in the St Thomas' A&E department compared with those reported in other A&E departments for all psychiatric presentations (52%) (Reference Dunn and FernandoDunn & Fernando, 1989) and DSH in particular (54%) (Reference Kapur, House and CreedKapur et al, 1998).

Psychiatric presentations to A&E departments serving deprived urban areas are unlikely to diminish in number and dedicated mental health services are urgently required to meet these needs. The strict sectorisation of community mental health services poses a funding problem for mental health work in A&E departments. Funding arrangements for patients coming to A&E who live outside the local area need to be resolved. The advent of primary-care-led mental health service commissioning threatens to sideline the role of the general hospital in mental health provision for non-local patients even further.

The National Service Framework for Mental Health (Department of Health, 1999) does acknowledge that A&E departments can make a valuable contribution to 24-hour access to services, particularly for patients who have deliberately self-harmed, ‘rough sleepers’ and those not registered with a GP. However, the underlying assumption guiding national policy seems to be that A&E departments are not the right environment for mental health assessments out of hours. Telephone helplines, extended hours for CMHTs and domiciliary visits by GPs are often mentioned as alternatives. We would argue that spending on these developments is unlikely to divert patients with mental health problems from A&E departments. Investment in dedicated A&E mental health liaison services could transform the quality of patients' and professionals' experiences of A&E psychiatry and lead to the view that this is a preferred point of access to mental health services, especially out of hours.

Since these data were collected, the local health authority, mental health trust and acute hospital trust have collaborated to expand the A&E mental health liaison team at St Thomas' Hospital as the A&E department merged with that formerly at Guy's. The team now includes a dedicated consultant psychiatrist, a staff grade psychiatrist and eight psychiatric liaison nurses (including a team leader) in addition to rotas of consultants and trainee psychiatrists both in and out of hours. The nurses aim to provide cover 24-hours a day. We hope to publish descriptions of the practice of this enlarged A&E mental health liaison team as it may prove to be a model for other large, inner-city A&E departments.

Acknowledgements

We thank Bob Taylor and Mark Roberts of the A&E department at St Thomas' and Sarah Ireland of Lambeth Healthcare NHS Trust for their assistance with data collection. At the time of this study S.C. was funded by the Priory Hospitals Group.

References

Crawford, M. J. & Kohen, D. (1997) Urgent psychiatric assessment in an inner-city A&E department. Psychiatric Bulletin, 21, 625626.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1999) National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modem Standards and Service Models. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. & Fernando, R. (1989) Psychiatric presentations to an accident and emergency department. Psychiatric Bulletin, 13, 672674.Google Scholar
Hawton, K. & Fagg, J. (1992) Trends in deliberate self poisoning and self injury in Oxford, 1976–90. BMJ, 304, 14091411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S. & Thornicroft, G. (1995) Emergency psychiatric services in England and Wales. BMJ, 311, 287288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S., Ramsay, R., Thornicroft, G., et al (1997) (eds) London's Mental Health. The Report to the King's Fund London Commission, 1997. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Kapur, N., House, A., Creed, F., et al (1998) Management of deliberate self poisoning in adults in four teaching hospitals: a descriptive study. BMJ, 316, 831832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.