Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:02:06.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Good practice of ECT administration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Prabhat Mahapatra*
Affiliation:
Care Principles, Dover Road, Barham, Canterbury, CT4 6PW
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2003

The audit cycle described by MacEwan (Psychiatric Bulletin, September 2002, 26, 337-339) demonstrates a common error in the practice of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) administration.

Patients who had brief or absent seizures were re-stimulated with higher charges in the practice described by MacEwan. What has not been taken into account is that duration of convulsions also depends on the individual's response to the muscle relaxant and therefore may not accurately reflect the duration of seizure activity in the brain.

Using motor seizures as a measure of effectiveness of the ECT was an excellent idea in the days of unmodified ECT. It must not be forgotten that muscle relaxants are used precisely to stop the convulsions, and therefore it would be erroneous to use the absence of motor seizures as evidence of inadequate stimulation.

Either electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring, or if resources do not allow this, use of the simple cuff method would be the best way of monitoring the duration of seizures. The fact the restimulation resulted in induction of adequate seizures in only 25% of cases demonstrates that it may not always be the best course of action.

Lalla & Milroy (Reference Lalla and Milroy1996) have published a comprehensive review of the literature about seizure duration in the practice of ECT. Their inference from the review is that there is a lack of good evidence to support the contention that longer ECT seizures are more efficacious.

References

Lalla, F. R. & Milroy, T. (1996) The current status of seizure duration in the practice of electroconvulsive therapy. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 299304.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.