Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:20:30.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic care record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

J. D. Reed*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry of Learning Disability, Heath Lane Hospital, West Bromwich, West Midlands B71 2BG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2005

Dr Holloway describes the moves to introduce an electronic care record (ECR) (Psychiatric Bulletin, July 2005, 29, 241-243). He raises concerns that ‘important qualitative aspects’ may be lost in the transition from existing medical records.

There is no reason to suppose that this should be the case. There is nothing contained in traditional records that cannot be easily translated to electronic form. The ‘qualitative aspects’ may be contained in free text notes or diagrams, and technology to include these is readily available. In addition, the fact that the record will be permanently accessible nationwide (and clearly legible) may encourage fuller and more informative recording than at present.

Clearly, the mechanism of entry will change from pen and paper to keyboard and mouse. This will pose no problem to the many increasingly IT-literate trainees, and for some will make data entry faster and more accurate. For everyone else, emergent technologies such as voice recognition may be appropriate or the secretarial role could be expanded to include typing of entries. Many documents (out-patient letters, minutes of meetings, etc) are already typed and held on computer, so including these in the ECR should be straightforward. There are clearly resource implications, but there will also be savings, as many labour-intensive aspects of paper notes (fetching and carrying, filing, locating records, etc) will no longer be needed.

Many trusts have already introduced some form of electronic patient record with success. None of the problems posed is insuperable, and with appropriate planning the ECR should surpass traditional medical records in every aspect.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.