Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:04:19.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical health of patients in rehabilitation and recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Satnam Singh Kunar*
Affiliation:
Staff Grade in Rehabilitation Psychiatry, St Michael's Hospital, St Michael's Road, Warwick CV34 5QW, e-mail: sskunar@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2005. The Royal College of Psychiatrists

I read with interest the article by Dr Greening (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2005, 29, 210-212). I have recently undertaken an audit of the physical healthcare of patients in our rehabilitation and recovery unit in Warwick. Unfortunately, my preliminary results show a similar picture to that reported by Dr Greening.

However, we do have a local general practitioner (GP) who has two sessions allocated per week for the review of any physical health problems: the type of ‘ shared care approach’ suggested by Lester (Reference Lester2005) and Bickle (Reference Bickle2005). It must be stressed though that it is not the responsibility of our GP colleagues to trawl through reams of notes (which most rehabilitation patients have) but rather up to the psychiatric team to ensure that patients are having appropriate investigations that can then be discussed with primary care.

For my audit I initially drew up a ‘checklist’ (standards) of the investigations that patients should have depending on what type of medication they are prescribed and how often, if at all, this ought to be repeated. I used the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines, British National Formulary and consulted pharmaceutical companies in drawing up the standards for each psychotropic agent - one must not forget mood stabilisers and antidepressants that also require monitoring. Although rather time-consuming, it is a more rigorous method than collating the views of colleagues as done by Pitman (Reference Pitman2005) prior to audit and is better than a battery of ‘routine tests’ which may be incomplete.

In addition, we have put together a health screen protocol for each patient that not only looks at issues such as diet, smoking, body mass index and exercise but also, among other things, posture/mobility, eyes, ears, teeth/oral hygiene, hair/scalp, immunisation history (although this can be difficult!), menstrual cycle, urinary tract infections and constipation. Each female will also be given appointments for mammograms and cervical smear tests when necessary, as well as leaflets on breast examination. All male patients will be given leaflets on testicular examination, provided by the primary care service. We will review the protocols annually but some areas will need to be addressed more often.

The reasons for regular review of the physical healthcare of psychiatric patients are well documented. I hope that by implementing these protocols using the shared care approach we are promoting a better quality of life that our patients deserve.

References

Bethlem & Maudsley NHS Trust (2003). The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines, 7th edn. London: M. Dunitz.Google Scholar
Bickle, A. R. (2005) Physical health of patients in rehabilitation and recovery: a case for surveying all records? (eLetter to Psychiatric Bulletin). http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/eletters/29/6/210#399 Google Scholar
British Medical Association & Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2005) British National Formulary (March issue). London & Wallingford: BMJ Books & Pharmaceutical Press.Google Scholar
Lester, H. (2005) Shared care for people with mental illness: a GP's perspective. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11, 133139.Google Scholar
Pitman, A. L. (2005) Lack of consensus over standards for physical investigations for psychiatric in-patients. (eLetter to Psychiatric Bulletin). http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/eletters/29/6/210#399 Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.