Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:47:22.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blood glucose testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Richard Hodgson
Affiliation:
Lymebrook Centre, Stoke-on-Trent ST5 7TL, email: richarde.hodgson@northstaffs.nhs.uk
Nanda Dayalan
Affiliation:
Lymebrook Centre, Stoke-on-Trent
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007

The results reported by Dr Tarrant (Psychiatric Bulletin, August 2006, 30, 286–288) on blood glucose testing for adults prescribed atypical antipsychotics are far more impressive than we obtained when we audited prescribing on acute psychiatric wards in four health districts in the West Midlands in 2004. Adherence to blood glucose testing ranged from 8 to 47% between these units for patients on atypical antipsychotics. These rates are poor even when allowing for an unwillingness of some patients with acute illness to agree to blood tests (Reference Hodgson and AdeyemoHodgson & Adeyemo, 2004).

In 2004 we carried out a survey of 181 consultant psychiatrists working across the West Midlands and found that only 52% undertook blood glucose monitoring and only 29.6% believed that psychiatrists should monitor the physical health of their patients. This survey underlined the tension between primary and secondary care over physical health monitoring for those with serious mental illness. The recent guidelines (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006) for the management of bipolar disorder recommend an annual physical health review in primary care. However, while a patient is in hospital it is difficult to justify any lack of monitoring of physical health given that psychiatry is a medical specialty. Abrogation of responsibility for physical evaluation of patients has implications for the profession as a whole. Acknowledgement of this responsibility is reflected in the College's requirement that candidates perform a physical examination in the both parts of the Membership examination. However, consultant psychiatrists are unlikely to maintain these skills, which is a compelling argument for basing the physical healthcare of those with serious mental illness in primary care.

References

Hodgson, R. E. & Adeyemo, O. (2004) Too little, too late? Physical examinations performed by trainee psychiatrists on newly admitted psychiatric patients. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 8, 5760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) The Management of Bipolar Disorder in Adults, Children and Adolescents, in Primary and Secondary Care. London: NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=cg38niceguideline Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.