Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:45:17.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forensic telepsychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul Stankard
Affiliation:
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Wells Road Centre, Nottingham NG3 3AA, email: pcstankard@doctors.org.uk
Saleem Younus
Affiliation:
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Wells Road Centre, Nottingham NG3 3AA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007

We read the article by Jones et al on setting up a telepsychiatry service (Psychiatric Bulletin, December 2006, 30, 464-467) with interest and optimism, having developed the first forensic telepsychiatry service in Nottinghamshire in 2005 (Reference Saleem and StankardSaleem & Stankard, 2006). To date, we have undertaken 30 forensic assessments, 4 of which have resulted in hospital admissions. Assessments were primarily undertaken using existing video-link facilities within local magistrates’ courts and HM prisons. Our experiences support the opinion that this saves time, cost (Reference Zollo, Kienzle and LoeffelholzZollo et al, 1999) and improves access to psychiatric services (Reference Zaylor, Whitten and KingsleyZaylor et al, 2000).

However, although Jones et al describe the development of services, they do not state whether they have assessed patients themselves using videoconferencing facilities. If they have, it would be useful to establish links between telepsychiatric services within the UK, forensic or otherwise.

At the College's invitation, we are conducting a workshop on this subject in Prague, at the Annual Meeting of the Forensic Faculty in February 2007. We have also developed a forensic telepsychiatric steering group, with a research sub-committee, in Nottingham. We are coordinating several research projects which are exploring the use of teleconferencing facilities within forensic psychiatry. We would welcome any additional views and opinions on expanding this work.

It is crucial for services across the UK to share experiences and promote practices. The promotion of telepsychiatry has the potential to change current practice positively. This is particularly important if we are to succeed in delivering timely, easily accessible and clinically sound psychiatric services, with the additional spotlight on cost-efficiency with respect to health service delivery.

References

Saleem, Y. & Stankard, P. (2006) I'm only at the end of a videolink. BMJ Career Focus, 333, 223.Google Scholar
Zaylor, C., Whitten, P. & Kingsley, C. (2000) Telemedicine services to a county jail. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6, 9395.Google Scholar
Zollo, S., Kienzle, M., Loeffelholz, P., et al (1999) Telemedicine to IOWA's correctional facilities: initial clinical experience and assessment of program costs. Telemedicine Journal, 5, 291301.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.