Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:04:32.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Falling between the cracks. Invited commentary on … Service innovation: the first year of lifestyle clinics for psychiatric outpatients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Fiona Gaughran*
Affiliation:
National Psychosis Unit, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Bethlem Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, London BR3 3BX, email: Fiona.gaughran@slam.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Hamilton's paper describes a thorough and pragmatic approach to the introduction of physical health checks in people registered with mental health services. This is a moral and political priority, but translating this into day-to-day practice in already stretched community mental health teams requires leadership and vision. Pivotal in Hamilton's success was the establishment of good channels of communication between the mental and physical healthcare teams. Hearing about good practice and positive experiences in other teams should help in the widespread introduction of reliable systems to improve physical health in mental health service users.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009

By now, it is well accepted by clinicians and policy-makers alike that the physical health of people with severe mental illness is very poor, with a greatly shortened life expectancy. Reference Marder, Essock, Miller, Buchanan, Casey and Davis1 Much of this excess mortality is due to diseases that are common in the general population Reference Brown, Barraclough and Inskip2 and which health services are well versed in treating. The main challenges faced by physicians lie in actually identifying the physical health problems of people with severe mental illness, and adapting the system to improve the uptake of treatment.

Hamilton et al describe the development and introduction of annual physical health checks for people with severe mental illness in two rural catchment areas. Reference Hamilton, Harrison, Naji and Robertson3 In line with previous studies, Reference Brugha, Wing and Smith4,Reference Koran, Sox, Marton, Moltzen, Sox and Kraemer5 a systematic approach to screening revealed high numbers of previously undiagnosed physical health problems, the identification of which should improve patient outcome and quality of life.

The substantial effect of staff enthusiasm on uptake is a striking finding of Hamilton et al's study. Reference Hamilton, Harrison, Naji and Robertson3 The team with high uptake seemed to have embraced the initiative of annual screenings, whereas the misgivings of the other team were associated with a lower uptake. This variation in attitude and enthusiasm between teams is not uncommon, despite the recent policy priority given to physical health in individuals with severe mental illness.

Government position

Improving the physical health of people with severe mental illness is now enshrined in UK government doctrine. 68 All healthcare organisations must now run systematic disease prevention and health promotion programmes. 9 Mental health trusts are still working on translating this fully into clinical practice; Hamilton et al's initiative provides a useful model.

In the meantime, it is still the case that any past experiences of stigmatising behaviour from health professionals that people with severe mental illness may have had may prevent them coming forward to seek physical healthcare. Mental health service users report ‘diagnostic overshadowing’ where clinicians interpret physical symptoms as part of the mental health problem. 10

What is holding patients back?

Barriers to services

People with severe mental illness face real barriers in accessing services. For example, rates of non-treatment for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia in severe mental illness are high, especially in women from Black and minority ethnic communities; Reference Nasrallah, Meyer, Goff, McEvoy, Davis and Stroup11 and although the use of cardioprotective medications in individuals with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness is increasing, many are still inadequately treated despite being at considerable cardiac risk. Reference Kreyenbuhl, Medoff, Seliger and Dixon12 A shift in approach is called for to eliminate unequal treatment, allowing these groups to be healthier and to participate fully in society, and to prevent the extra costs of serious ill health being passed on to other parts of the National Health Service. 10

Illness-related factors

Factors related to the patient or their illness such as impaired cognitive or organisational skills, poor concordance, compromised communication and lack of motivation, as well as previous bad experiences, reduce the likelihood of successful identification and management of physical health problems in those with severe mental illness. 10,Reference Lambert, Velakoulis and Pantelis13 These can all be addressed on an individual level by motivated clinicians and there are plenty of examples of such good practice. However, to uniformly improve care we must address the organisational problems such as conflicts over centre of responsibility, inadequate time and resources, and diagnostic overshadowing, neatly quoted by Lambert et al as ‘falling between the cracks’. Reference Lambert, Velakoulis and Pantelis13

Necessary changes in service provision

It is important to be clear what is asked; we do not expect mental health professionals to become general practitioners (GPs) themselves, but all mental health staff should understand what screening tests are necessary and facilitate communication with the appropriate team to arrange this and any ongoing care. This is a change. Change in any system is fraught with difficulties and requires a shared sense of urgency, an understanding that the problem cannot be ignored, and leadership to overcome the fear of failure. Reference Kotter14 Day-to-day clinical communication must start to include the ‘new improved’ physical health message routinely.

Conclusions from Hamilton's study

Hamilton's community mental health teams (CMHTs) took responsibility for making things happen such as blood tests, communication and follow-up of results and clinic appointments, as well as adopting a pragmatic approach to transport. This approach is key to the management of physical health in severe mental illness, first because primary care traditionally operates a less assertive model of care, and second, because it allows a consistent approach, less subject to variation between GP practices.

Government initiatives

Physical health in people with severe mental illness is everyone's problem. The National Service Framework and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence encouraged primary and secondary services to collaborate to improve physical outcomes in severe mental illness. 6,7 Linking with primary care and hospital consultants undoubtedly improved the success of this programme and serves as a model for other services to adapt to their local needs. That old stalwart clinical audit can boost health screening rates once a start has been made. Reference Barnes, Paton, Hancock, Cavanagh, Taylor and Lelliott15

Staff training

Training for staff to improve confidence and effectiveness is important. Mental health nurses are expected to have the skills and opportunities to improve the physical well-being of people with mental health problems. 16 However, many care coordinators are not nurses and may feel under-equipped for this role and so require support.

Lifestyle changes

The CATIE study concluded that smoking cessation, nutrition counselling and exercise programmes would help to reduce cardiovascular mortality in people with severe mental illness. Reference Goff, Sullivan, McEvoy, Meyer, Nasrallah and Daumit17 Hamilton et al demonstrate the feasibility, sustainability and acceptability of lifestyle advice and interventions. They were also innovative in that they addressed a range of needs, including substance use which further increases physical morbidity in people with severe mental illness. Reference Batki, Meszaros, Strutynski, Dimmock, Leontieva and Ploutz-Snyder18,Reference Isaac, Isaac and Holloway19

Resources

Resources are important. The Hamilton team was lucky to have a community dietician and a mental health-specific smoking cessation specialist. However, the required changes cannot wait to see whether the current recession is v-shaped, u-shaped or w-shaped until more money is allocated to improving physical health in severe mental illness. In the meantime, CMHTs should identify local resources and encourage service users to participate as much as possible in community-based activities, if necessary providing support and training for staff to support service users. This will increase community integration and reduce stigma.

Conclusions

The criteria to effect change are now in place; it is clear that the physical health in people with mental illness as a problem can no longer be ignored, and there is a commitment to change at senior levels of the health service. Let us follow Hamilton's team in making it happen on the ground.

Declaration of interest

References

1 Marder, SR, Essock, SM, Miller, AL, Buchanan, RW, Casey, DE, Davis, JM, et al. Physical health monitoring of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 1334–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Brown, S, Barraclough, B, Inskip, H. Causes of the excess mortality of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 212–7.Google Scholar
3 Hamilton, R, Harrison, M, Naji, S, Robertson, C. Service innovation: the first year of lifestyle clinics for psychiatric out-patients. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 445448.Google Scholar
4 Brugha, TS, Wing, JK, Smith, BL. Physical health of the long-term mentally ill in the community. Is there unmet need? Br J Psychiatry 1989; 155: 777–81.Google Scholar
5 Koran, LM, Sox, HC, Marton, KI, Moltzen, S, Sox, CH, Kraemer, HC, et al. Medical evaluation of psychiatric patients. 1. Results in a state of mental health system. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46: 733–40.Google Scholar
6 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. NICE, 2002.Google Scholar
7 Department of Health. National Service Framework for Mental Health. Department of Health, 1999.Google Scholar
8 Department of Health. Public Health White Paper. Choosing Health: Making Healthier Choices Easier. Department of Health, 2004.Google Scholar
9 Department of Health. Standards for Better Health. Department of Health, 2004.Google Scholar
10 Disability Rights Commission. Equal Treatment: Closing the Gap. Disability Rights Commission, 2006.Google Scholar
11 Nasrallah, HA, Meyer, JM, Goff, DC, McEvoy, JP, Davis, SM, Stroup, TS, et al. Low rates of treatment for hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes in schizophrenia: data from the CATIE schizophrenia trial sample at baseline. Schizophr Res 2006; 86: 1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Kreyenbuhl, J, Medoff, DR, Seliger, SL, Dixon, LB. Use of medications to reduce cardiovascular risk among individuals with psychotic disorders and Type 2 diabetes. Schizophr Res 2008; 101: 256–65.Google Scholar
13 Lambert, TJ, Velakoulis, D, Pantelis, C. Medical comorbidity in schizophrenia. Med J Aust 2003; 178 (suppl): S6770.Google Scholar
14 Kotter, JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail? Harv Bus Rev 1995; March–April: 110.Google Scholar
15 Barnes, TR, Paton, C, Hancock, E, Cavanagh, MR, Taylor, D, Lelliott, P. UK Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health. Screening for the metabolic syndrome in community psychiatric patients prescribed antipsychotics: a quality improvement programme. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2008; 118: 2633.Google Scholar
16 Department of Health. Chief Nursing Officer's Review of Mental Health Nursing. Department of Health, 2006.Google Scholar
17 Goff, DC, Sullivan, LM, McEvoy, JP, Meyer, JM, Nasrallah, HA, Daumit, GL, et al. A comparison of ten-year cardiac risk estimates in schizophrenia patients from the CATIE study and matched controls. Schizophr Res 2005; 80: 4553.Google Scholar
18 Batki, SL, Meszaros, ZS, Strutynski, K, Dimmock, JA, Leontieva, L, Ploutz-Snyder, R, et al. Medical comorbidity in patients with schizophrenia and alcohol dependence. Schizophr Res 2009; 107: 139–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Isaac, M, Isaac, M, Holloway, F. Is cannabis an anti-antipsychotic? the experience in psychiatric intensive care. Hum Psychopharmacol 2005; 20: 207–10.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.