Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:48:41.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Staff attitudes to smoking and the smoking ban

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Kudlur Thyarappa Praveen
Affiliation:
Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Fromeside, Blackberry Hill Hospital, Stapleton, Bristol BS16 1EG, email: praveenkt@doctors.org.uk
Swamy Nirvana Chandrappa Kudlur
Affiliation:
Worcestershire Mental Health Partnership Trust
Rudresh Paramishiyaiah Hanabe
Affiliation:
Worcestershire Mental Health Partnership Trust, Worcester
Adeyemi Tiwalade Egbewunmi
Affiliation:
Gloucester Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, Birmingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and Method

Our aim was to explore attitudes of in-patient mental health staff to smoking and the smoking ban. A questionnaire was distributed to staff (n=450) working at National Health Service psychiatric units in three different locations.

Results

We obtained 308 responses, at a response rate of 68.4%. Staff were generally less permissive towards smoking in mental health units when compared with previous studies. However, most (78.9%) feared that service users' states would deteriorate if they were not allowed to smoke.

Clinical Implications

We found small but noticeable change in staff attitudes following initial reforms in smoking policy. However, there is a need for further significant change in staff attitudes to facilitate implementation of a total smoking ban from July 2008.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009

The White Paper Choosing Health: Making Healthier Choices Easier (Department of Health, 2004) made a commitment to a smoke-free National Health Service (NHS) by the end of 2006. The Health Act 2006 introduced a smoking ban in public spaces across England and Wales from 1 July 2007. However, mental health units were given an exemption of 12 months for implementing this Act (Office for Public Sector Information, 2007). In the interim, the ban was partial in these units and smoking was allowed only in designated areas.

In the UK, prevalence of smoking in general population is estimated at 26% (Reference Rickards, Fox and RobertsRickards et al, 2004). Many studies have reported higher rates of smoking among service users in psychiatric hospitals at 63-72% (Reference Meltzer, Gill and HindsMeltzer et al, 1996; Reference Kelly and McCreadieKelly & McCreadie, 1999; Reference Coulthard, Farrell and SingletonCoulthard et al, 2002; Reference McCreadieMcCreadie, 2003). However, previous studies have reported variable rates of smoking among mental health professionals. A study in the UK found smoking prevalence rate among psychiatric nurses twice that found among other groups of nurses (Reference GubbayGubbay, 1992), whereas another survey in Israel reported a 48% smoking rate among staff members in mental health units (Reference Mester, Toren and Ben-MosheMester et al, 1993). In a recent study by Stubbs et al (Reference Stubbs, Haw and Garner2004), all in-patient staff working in a large private psychiatric hospital in the UK were surveyed about their smoking habits and attitudes. In this survey, 22% of respondents were smokers, 6% favoured a total smoking ban, 21.5% believed that cigarettes should be given to service users to achieve therapeutic goals, 40.2% believed that they should not be allowed to smoke with service users, 54.3% believed that smoking with service users can help create therapeutic relationships and 93.2% believed that service users would deteriorate if they couldn't have cigarettes. Staff who were smokers were more permissive towards smoking than non-smokers (Reference Stubbs, Haw and GarnerStubbs et al, 2004). In a similar survey of psychiatric units in 2006, staff feared that a smoking ban would lead to an increase in stress, aggressive and agitated behaviour, verbal abuse and serious violence from service users. Staff argued that a ban infringed on service users’ human rights and many staff who were smokers believed that it was therapeutic to smoke with service users (Reference Jochelson and MajrowskiJochelson & Majrowski, 2006).

In light of the total smoking ban from July 2008, we felt the need to study any change in attitudes about smoking among staff in NHS mental health units. We also felt that such a study could provide valuable information to guide hospitals in supporting staff and service users with the implementation of the ban.

Method

A questionnaire was drafted using themes from a previous study, after obtaining permission from the authors (Reference Stubbs, Haw and GarnerStubbs et al, 2004). The questionnaire included the following themes: occupation, gender, age, smoking status, awareness of smoking ban, views on service users smoking on the ward, views on staff smoking with service users, anticipated difficulties with the smoking ban, current support available for managing the smoking ban and views on effects of the smoking ban on staff work efficiency. Most questions had tick-box options and some had an option for additional comments (questionnaire available from the authors on request).

We distributed the questionnaire to staff (n=450) in in-patient mental health units where we worked. Data were collected between December 2006 and February 2007. The units were acute adult wards, rehabilitation wards, elderly wards and low secure units in Birmingham, Buckinghamshire and central London. The clinical staff included doctors, nurses, healthcare assistants, occupational therapists and pharmacists.

Results

We received the total of 308 responses, with a response rate of 68.4%. Respondent characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Respondents’ characteristics

All respondents (n=308) n (%) Smokers (n=71) n (%) Non-smokers (n=235)a,b n (%)
Occupation
    Manager 17 (5.5) 6 (1.9) 11 (3.6)
    Registered nurse 116 (37.7) 26 (8.4) 90 (29.2)
    Doctor 41 (13.3) 9 (2.9) 32 (10.4)
    Other 120 (38.9) 29 (9.4) 90 (29.2)
    No response 14 (4.5) 1 (0.3) 12 (3.9)
Gender
    Male 115 (37.3) 22 (7.1) 93 (30.2)
    Female 171 (55.5) 47 (15.3) 122 (39.6)
    No response 22 (7.1) 2 (0.6) 20 (6.5)
Age group, years
    16–25 31 (10.1) 11 (3.6) 20 (6.5)
    26–35 101 (32.8) 24 (7.8) 77 (25.0)
    36–45 80 (25.9) 21 (6.8) 59 (19.2)
    46–55 59 (19.2) 12 (3.9) 47 (15.3)
    56–65 27 (8.8) 2 (0.6) 25 (8.1)
    No response 10 (3.2) 1 (0.3) 7 (2.3)

Almost all staff (95.4%) were aware of the proposed smoking ban and 92.9% felt that passive smoking was dangerous. Less than half (46.4%) had smoked at least once in their lifetime, whereas only 23.1% were current smokers. Two-thirds of the smokers (62%) had attempted to quit smoking at least once; 52.1% felt that seeing other people smoke made it difficult to quit smoking; only 7.0% were heavy smokers (smoking more than 20 cigarettes/day).

Staff views on smoking and the smoking ban are presented in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2. Staff views on smoking and the smoking ban

All staff (n=308) n (%) Smokers (n=71)a,b n (%) Non-smokers (n=235)a,b n (%)
1. Should service users be allowed to smoke on the ward?
    Yes 143 (46.4) 53 (17.2) 88 (28.6)
    No 157 (50.9) 15 (4.9) 142 (46.1)
    No response 8 (2.6) 3 (0.9) 5 (1.6)
2. Where should staff and service users be allowed to smoke?c
    Designated indoor areas (smoke room) 148 (48.1) 49 (15.9) 97 (31.5)
    Outdoors 132 (42.9) 37 (12.0) 95 (30.8)
    Total ban 70 (22.7) 2 (0.6) 68 (22.1)
    No response 2 (0.6) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
3. Should staff be allowed to smoke with service users?
    Yes 89 (28.9) 30 (9.7) 57 (18.5)
    No 215 (69.8) 40 (12.9) 175 (56.8)
    No response 4 (1.3) 1 (0.3) 3 (0.9)
4. Are there any benefits in allowing staff to smoke with service users?
    Yes 119 (38.6) 46 (14.9) 71 (23.1)
    No 167 (54.2) 24 (7.8) 143 (46.4)
    No response 22 (7.1) 1 (0.3) 21 (6.8)
5. Should cigarettes be given to service users to achieve therapeutic goals?
    Yes 51 (16.6) 16 (5.2) 33 (10.7)
    No 249 (80.8) 52 (16.9) 197 (63.9)
    No response 8 (2.6) 3 (0.9) 5 (1.6)
6. Do service users become more agitated or deteriorate in their mental health if they are not allowed to smoke?
    Yes 243 (78.9) 66 (21.4) 175 (56.8)
    No 41 (13.3) 1 (0.3) 40 (12.9)
    No response 24 (7.8) 4 (1.3) 20 (6.5)
7. Which aspect of service users’ health will benefit from smoking ban?c
    Mental health 45 (14.6) 2 (0.6) 43 (13.9)
    Physical health 196 (63.6) 21 (6.8) 173 (56.2)
    Both 95 (30.8) 40 (12.9) 45 (14.6)
    Neither 13 (4.2) 10 (3.3) 3 (0.9)
    No response 14 (4.5) 9 (2.9) 5 (1.6)
8. How will the efficiency of staff who smoke be affected by the smoking ban policy?
    Improved 107 (34.7) 3 (0.9) 104 (33.8)
    Reduced 105 (34.1) 27 (8.8) 78 (25.3)
    No response 96 (31.2) 41 (13.3) 53 (17.2)

Table 3. Responses from different mental health professionals

Managers (n=17) n (%)a Registered nurses (n=116) n (%)a Doctors (n=41) n (%)a Othersb,c (n=120) n (%)a
1. Should service users be allowed to smoke on the ward?
    Yes 8 (47.1) 57 (49.1) 19 (46.3) 50 (41.7)
    No 8 (47.1) 58 (50.0) 22 (53.7) 65 (54.2)
    No response 1 (5.9) 1 (0.9) 0 5 (4.2)
2. Where should staff and service users be allowed to smoke?d
    Designated indoor areas (smoke room) 9 (52.9) 59 (50.9) 22 (53.7) 53 (44.2)
    Outdoors 7 (41.2) 53 (45.7) 17 (41.5) 46 (38.3)
    Total ban 5 (29.4) 23 (19.8) 8 (19.5) 33 (27.5)
    No response 0 1 (0.9) 0 1 (0.8)
3. Should staff be allowed to smoke with service users?
    Yes 3 (17.6) 42 (36.2) 5 (12.2) 30 (25.0)
    No 14 (82.4) 72 (62.1) 36 (87.8) 89 (74.2)
    No response 0 2 (1.7) 0 1 (0.8)
4. Are there any benefits in allowing staff to smoke with service users?
    Yes 7 (41.2) 54 (46.5) 9 (21.9) 40 (33.3)
    No 8 (47.1) 59 (50.9) 27 (65.9) 69 (57.5)
    No response 2 (11.8) 3 (2.6) 5 (12.2) 11 (9.2)
5. Should cigarettes be given to service users to achieve therapeutic goals?
    Yes 3 (17.6) 23 (19.8) 6 (14.6) 14 (11.7)
    No 13 (76.5) 92 (79.3) 35 (85.4) 100 (83.3)
    No response 1 (5.9) 1 (0.9) 0 6 (5.0)
6. Do service users become more agitated or deteriorate in their mental health if they are not allowed to smoke?
    Yes 13 (76.5) 95 (81.9) 35 (85.4) 86 (71.7)
    No 2 (11.8) 15 (12.9) 3 (7.3) 21 (17.5)
    No response 2 (11.8) 6 (5.2) 3 (7.3) 13 (10.8)
7. Which aspect of service users’ health will benefit from smoking ban?d
    Mental health 4 (23.5) 19 (16.4) 8 (19.5) 12 (10.0)
    Physical health 12 (70.6) 75 (64.7) 29 (70.7) 77 (64.2)
    Both 5 (29.4) 31 (26.7) 15 (36.6) 36 (30.0)
    Neither 0 8 (6.9) 2 (4.9) 1 (0.8)
    No response 1 (5.9) 5 (4.3) 1 (2.4) 7 (5.8)
8. How will the efficiency of staff who smoke be affected by the smoking ban policy?
    Improved 5 (29.4) 35 (30.2) 19 (46.3) 43 (35.8)
    Reduced 3 (17.6) 44 (37.9) 12 (29.3) 41 (34.2)
    No response 9 (52.9) 37 (31.9) 10 (24.4) 36 (30.0)

Staff anticipated the following problems if service users were not allowed to smoke: use of illicit ways to smoke (67.5%), absconding to smoke (58.8%), use of leave from hospital to smoke (57.1%), increased use of as needed (PRN) medication (53.2%), discharge against medical advice (34.1%) and increased use of illicit substances (28.6%). Staff were managing agitated service users (when they were not allowed to smoke) in the following ways: relaxation/distraction techniques (44.5%), allowing ventilation of feelings (39.6%), smoking breaks at designated areas (39%) and with medication when needed (19.2%).

Discussion

This study reports a smoking rate of 23.1% among mental healthcare staff and 46.4% of respondents who had smoked at least once, which is less than in previous studies (Reference GubbayGubbay 1992; Reference Mester, Toren and Ben-MosheMester et al, 1993). There were more smokers among female staff (27%) than among male staff (19%), but the overall number of smokers decreased with increasing age group. The majority of staff were aware of the smoking legislation and dangers of passive smoking.

Staff were less permissive towards smoking than in previous studies (Reference Stubbs, Haw and GarnerStubbs et al, 2004). More staff favoured a total smoking ban (22.7% v. 6%) and more were against smoking with service users (69.8% v. 40.2%). Fewer staff believed that cigarettes should be given to service users to achieve therapeutic goals (16.6% v. 21.5%), that service users’ physical and/or mental health would deteriorate if not allowed to smoke (78.9% v. 93.2%) and that allowing staff to smoke with service users was beneficial (38.6% v. 54.3%).

Staff who were smokers were more permissive in their attitudes towards smoking when compared with non-smokers. The majority of smokers (three-quarters) believed that service users should be allowed to smoke on the ward and more than half believed that staff should be allowed to smoke with them, recognising the benefits in doing so. Only 1% of smokers favoured a total ban on smoking and the majority feared that service users would deteriorate if not allowed to smoke. The conclusions of Stubbs et al's (Reference Stubbs, Haw and Garner2004) study were similar. However, three-quarters of smokers believed that cigarettes should not be used to achieve therapeutic goals.

As shown in Table 3, staff from different professional backgrounds had similar views on smoking in in-patient units and about the smoking ban. However, in comparison with other professionals, more nurses (around a third) recognised benefits in allowing staff to smoke with service users and nearly half believed that staff should be allowed to smoke with service users. This probably reflects the variable roles and practical challenges faced by different professionals within a multidisciplinary setting. Similar observations were noted in previous studies where professionals differed in their views on benefits in staff smoking with service users (Reference Mester, Toren and Ben-MosheMester et al, 1993; Reference TarbuckTarbuck, 1996).

Limitations

Studies of this nature are subject to criticism. Random sampling was not used, which might have led to sampling bias. There might have been a self-report bias among respondents and it could be argued that staff with strong views on the smoking ban, or those affected by it, were more likely to respond. Also, some would argue that using a questionnaire with tick-box options might limit the range of responses. However, many questions in this study had an option for comments and several comments were received (reporting them is beyond the scope of this paper). Additionally, the extent of change in staff attitudes might be partly caused by different work environments in private and NHS psychiatric units.

Conclusions

This study found a small but noticeable change in staff attitudes to smoking on in-patient units and the smoking ban, which could be viewed as a response to initial reforms in smoking policy. This is in line with findings from studies in other countries (Reference Lawn and PolsLawn & Pols, 2005). However, there is a need for further significant change in staff attitudes, in light of the total smoking ban. To facilitate this change, mental health services would need to create an environment where multidisciplinary staff are involved in consultation, education and training to understand the need for change and its benefits. Alternative support to assist staff in managing potential problems identified with the total smoking ban could play an important role in bringing about this change. Staff who are smokers may particularly need support during the implementation of the total smoking ban from July 2008. It would also be interesting to study staff attitudes after implementation of the total smoking ban and the effects of the ban on service users’ mental and physical health.

Declaration of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr Sanju George for his valuable opinions and suggestions on the manuscript.

References

Coulthard, M., Farrell, M., Singleton, N., et al (2002) Tobacco, Alcohol and Drug Use and Mental Health. TSO (The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Department of Health (2004) Choosing Health: Making Healthier Choices Easier. Department of Health.Google Scholar
Gubbay, J. (1992) Smoking and the Workplace. Centre for Health Policy Research, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Jochelson, K. & Majrowski, W. (2006) Clearing the Air: Debating Smoke-Free Policies in Psychiatric Units. King's Fund.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. & McCreadie, R.G. (1999) Smoking habits, current symptoms and pre-morbid characteristics patients in Nithsdale, Scotland. American Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 498502.Google Scholar
Lawn, S. & Pols, R. (2005) Smoking bans in psychiatric in-patient settings? Areview of the research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 866885.Google Scholar
McCreadie, R. G. (2003) Diet, smoking and cardiovascular risk in people with schizophrenia. Descriptive study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 534539.Google Scholar
Meltzer, H., Gill, B., Hinds, K., et al (1996) OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain. Report 6: Economic Activity and Social Functioning of Residents with Psychiatric Disorders. HMSO.Google Scholar
Mester, R., Toren, P., Ben-Moshe, Y., et al (1993) Survey of smoking habits and attitudes of patients and staff in psychiatric hospitals. Psychopathology, 26, 6975.Google Scholar
Office of Public Sector Information (2007) The Smoke-Free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007. Office of Public Sector Information (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/uksi_20070765_en_1).Google Scholar
Rickards, L., Fox, K., Roberts, C., et al (2004) Living in Britain No. 31 Results from the 2002 General Household Survey. TSO (The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Stubbs, J., Haw, C. & Garner, L. (2004) Survey of staff attitudes to smoking in a large psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 204207.Google Scholar
Tarbuck, P. (1996) Smoking with patients. Policy vs. therapy. British Journal of Nursing, 5, 224–29.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Respondents’ characteristics

Figure 1

Table 2. Staff views on smoking and the smoking ban

Figure 2

Table 3. Responses from different mental health professionals

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.