Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:51:39.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cocaine use and dependence in clients attending a drug treatment centre in Dublin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mpho Abel Thula*
Affiliation:
Drug Treatment Centre Board, Trinity Court, 30–31 Pearse Street, Dublin, Ireland, email: poster6@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and Method

To assess the number of cocaine-dependent clients attending a typical addiction clinic, using urine drug testing for screening and a structured clinical interview for diagnostic assessment.

Results

Of the 419 clients whose urine records were analysed, 38 were regular users of cocaine (9.1%), with at least half of their urine samples positive for cocaine in a 12-week period; 84.2% of these regular users of cocaine satisfied the criteria for cocaine dependence (7.7% of the total number of those attending the clinic).

Clinical Implications

Publicly funded addiction treatment centres in Ireland are mostly designed for the treatment of opiate addiction. There is, however, a significant problem of concomitant cocaine dependence in these centres. Increased availability of psychological/behavioural treatment programmes with proven efficacy in cocaine addiction may help improve overall treatment outcome.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009

The Drug Treatment Centre Board in Dublin runs the largest substance misuse treatment centre in Ireland, with over 500 clients from all over Dublin registered with the clinic. The vast majority are on substitution treatment for opiate dependence. However, cocaine use is increasingly becoming a major problem in this group as the use of the drug in the country continues to increase. In January 2008, a report by the National Advisory Committee on Drugs, and the Drug and Alcohol Information and Research Unit noted a significant increase in lifetime cocaine prevalence rates among all adults (15-64 years of age) in Ireland, from 2.5% in 2002/2003 to 5.1% 2006/2007 (National Advisory Committee on Drugs, 2008). In a national multi-site evaluation in the USA (Reference Hubbard, Craddock and FlynnHubbard et al, 1997), cocaine misuse was found in 42% of those beginning treatment with methadone and in 22% of the same group at 1-year follow-up. Cocaine misuse during opioid maintenance treatment has been associated with poor treatment outcome (Reference Demaria, Sterling and WeinsteinDeMaria et al, 2000); a high risk of HIV infection (Reference Bux, Lamb and IguchiBux et al, 1995); higher levels of family, medical, vocational and legal problems; and continued focus on drug-related criminal activity (Reference Kosten, Rounsaville and KleberKosten et al, 1987). Clients with cocaine dependence also have a greater risk of suicidal behaviour (Reference Marzuk, Tardiff and LeonMarzuk et al, 1982).

The aim of the study was to quantify the number of regular users of cocaine in the treatment centre, using a cut-off point of half weekly urine samples testing cocaine positive in a 12-week period. The study also sought to find out what proportion of this cohort of regular users fulfil dependence criteria as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I) (Reference First, Spitzer and GibbonFirst et al, 2002).

Method

Participants

Using the database from the clinic laboratory, information was obtained about urine drug test results for all clients attending the drug treatment centre over a 12-week period between 7 August and 30 October 2007 (clients are required to submit a urine sample for drug analysis once a week as part of the treatment programme). The results were then analysed to find the number of clients whose urine samples tested positive for cocaine in more that 50% of cases. Only those who provided more than four samples over the period of analysis and had provided a sample within 3 weeks of the commencement date of the study were selected for further assessment. All eligible candidates provided written voluntary consent for involvement in the study. The study and all its procedures were approved by the drug treatment centre board ethics committee.

Diagnostic measures

Participants fulfilling the study criteria were assessed for cocaine dependence using SCID-I. The assessment was carried out by a psychiatrist.

Results

Participants

The data from the laboratory showed that 419 clients had submitted a minimum of four urine samples for drug testing in the 12-week period, of which 38 (9.1%) met the inclusion criteria of at least half for cocaine positive samples in this period.

Of the 38 candidates who were eligible for assessment for cocaine dependence, 2 did not give their consent to participate in the assessment (5.3%) and 3 (7.9 %) could not be assessed for other reasons (1 was in prison, 1 had since stopped attending the clinic and 1 had a very poor attendance record). Therefore, 33 of the eligible candidates were assessed for cocaine dependence. The flow of candidates through the study up to the assessment stage is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Study profile.

Outcomes

Of the candidates who were assessed using SCID-I, 32 satisfied the criteria for cocaine dependence and 1 did not (Table 1). Therefore, 84.2% of all eligible candidates satisfied the DSM-IV criteria for dependence and 2.6% did not. Of the 32 candidates who satisfied the DSM-IV criteria for dependence, 3 (9%) did not meet the criteria in the last month before the diagnostic assessment; 25 (86%) of those who met the criteria for cocaine dependence in the previous month had physiological dependence to the drug.

Table 1. Results of the SCID–I assessment

Gender Current cocaine dependence, n Cocaine dependence, but not in month before assessment, n No cocaine dependence, n Total, n
Male 21 3 1 25
Female 8 0 0 8
Total 29 3 1 33

Discussion

The study aimed to assess the extent of cocaine dependence among clients attending treatment for opiate addiction. The results showed that 9.1% of clients attending an opioid dependence treatment clinic were regular users of cocaine and 84.2% of these satisfied the DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence as assessed by SCID-I. In total, 7.7% of clients attending the clinic had cocaine dependence. This compares well with previous studies of cocaine dependence in this population group, where 9% of daily cocaine misuse was found in patients 6 months after admission into methadone maintenance treatment, falling to 6% after 12 months (Reference Dobler-Mikola, Hättenschwiller and MeiliDobler-Mikola et al, 2005). Although most available data tend to quote cocaine use and cocaine misuse, this study set out to find the rates of cocaine dependence in a chosen population group.

The 2007 report from the National Advisory Committee on Drugs in Ireland noted that treatment programmes in Ireland are not designed for stimulant users and that opiate-based treatment services have to deal with increasing numbers of individuals presenting with cocaine-related problems (National Advisory Committee on Drugs, 2007). Cocaine use is higher among individuals with opiate dependence in maintenance treatment than among the general population (Reference Haasen, Prinzleve and ZurholdHaasen et al, 2004). Although effective substitution pharmacological treatment is available for opioid dependence, there is no similarly effective intervention for primary cocaine dependence (Reference Delima, Deoliviera Soares and Reisserde Lima et al, 2002). However, psychosocial interventions, mainly contingency management and cognitive-behavioural approaches, have been effective in the management of cocaine addiction (Reference Rawson, Huber and McCannRawson et al, 2002).

Drug treatment programmes focusing mainly on opiate addiction need to adapt so that they can deal with increasing numbers of cocaine users (National Advisory Committee on Drugs, 2007). This will require resources and training in non-pharmacological approaches that have been shown to be effective in treating cocaine addiction.

Limitations

The sample of those who were eligible for assessment was quite small. Of the 38 clients eligible for diagnostic assessment, 5 (13%) could not be assessed, which could have affected the outcome. At any given time, patients who fail to stabilise on opioid agonist maintenance are placed on a low-dose regime for a defined period of time as part of contingency management and do not have to provide urine samples. Therefore, they would not be included in this study. This group tend to be more likely to be misusing cocaine as well as opiates. Excluding this group could have underestimated the prevalence of cocaine dependence in the clinic.

Diagnostic assessment was carried out by one individual which could have resulted in bias.

Despite the limitations of the study, the results show that there is a significant cocaine dependence problem among clients attending opioid treatment centres. Appropriate services need to be put in place to address this.

Declaration of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

I thank the clients at the Drug Treatment Centre, Dublin, who took part in the study and Dr Brion Sweeny for his guidance.

References

Bux, D. A., Lamb, R. J. & Iguchi, M.Y. (1995) Cocaine use and HIV risk behavior in methadone maintenance patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 37, 2935.Google Scholar
Delima, M. S., Deoliviera Soares, B. G., Reisser, A. A., et al (2002) Pharmacological treatment of cocaine dependence: a systematic review. Addiction, 97, 931949.Google Scholar
Demaria, P. A. Jr., Sterling, R. & Weinstein, S. P. (2000) The effect of stimulant and sedative use on treatment outcome of patients admitted to methadone maintenance treatment. American Journal of Addictions, 9, 145153.Google Scholar
Dobler-Mikola, A., Hättenschwiller, J., Meili, D., et al (2005) Patterns of heroin, cocaine and alcohol abuse during long-term methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29, 259265.Google Scholar
First, M. B, Spitzer, R. L, Gibbon, M., et al (2002) Structured Clinical Inter view for DSM–IV–TR Axis I Disorders (research version, patient edition). Biometric Research, New York Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Haasen, C., Prinzleve, M., Zurhold, H., et al (2004) Cocaine use in Europe: a multi-centre study. European Addiction Research, 10, 139146.Google Scholar
Hubbard, R. L., Craddock, S. G., Flynn, P. M., et al (1997) Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 261278.Google Scholar
Kosten, T. R., Rounsaville, B. J. & Kleber, H. D. (1987) A 2.5-year follow-up of cocaine use among treated opioid addicts: have our treatments helped? Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 281284.Google Scholar
Marzuk, P. M., Tardiff, K., Leon, A. C., et al (1982) Prevalence of cocaine use among residents of New York City who committed suicide during a one-year period. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 371375.Google Scholar
National Advisory Committee on Drugs (2007) An Overview of Cocaine Use in Ireland II. The Stationery Office Dublin.Google Scholar
National Advisory Committee on Drugs & the Drug and Alcohol Information and Research Unit (2008) Drug Use in Ireland and Northern Ireland: First Results from the 2006/2007 Drug Prevalence Survey. NACD.Google Scholar
Rawson, R. A., Huber, A., McCann, M. J., et al (2002) A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 817824.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study profile.

Figure 1

Table 1. Results of the SCID–I assessment

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.