Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:49:32.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A policy to deal with sexual assault on psychiatric in-patient wards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Daphne R. D. Wallace*
Affiliation:
Convenor of Public Policy Committee Working Group for CR52 and CR145, 15 Holme Park, High Benthan, Lancaster LA2 7ND, email: daphne@drwallace.co.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009

Lawn & McDonald outline a clear policy that they have developed for dealing with sexual assault on in-patient psychiatric wards (Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 108–11). I welcome their account and in particular their flow chart and the accompanying guidance for its use. In their references they list the Royal College of Psychiatrists report CR52 Sexual Abuse and Harassment in Psychiatric Settings. I regret that they do not refer to the subsequent College Report CR145 Sexual Boundary Issues in Psychiatric Settings (online only) published in August 2007. To quote from the College website: ‘This revision of the original College Report CR52: Sexual Abuse and Harassment in Psychiatric Settings… has led to a review within a wider remit, taking into account major developments in the legal framework within which patients are treated and encompassing a broader discussion on sexuality. Issues of capacity and consent are relevant for all areas of care, and psychiatric professionals have to balance principles of autonomy and protection. Particularly relevant in this context are the Human Rights Act 1998, the Sexual Offences Act 2003, the Mental Capacity Act 2003, and additional legislation regarding standards of care for both adults and children. The area is one of high risk in terms of likelihood and impact because of the vulnerability of the patient group. Recommendations are made in the light of the Kerr/Haslam Report (2005), the Patient Safety Observatory Report 2 (NPSA 2006), and the government report Safeguarding Patients (2007)’ (www.rcpsych.ac.uk/publications/collegereports/cr/cr145.aspx).

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.