Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T15:56:56.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pessimism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

David Abrahamson*
Affiliation:
Formerly based in east London, email: david.abrahamson855@googlemail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010

Professor Burns Reference Burns1 is right to draw attention to possible damaging effects of separating consultant responsibility for in-patient and out-patient care. My past experience of both overall and out-patient-only responsibility supports the points he makes. Particularly striking was distress for patients at having to get to know a new consultant and go back over long-term histories at the particularly fraught time of admission, as well as intractable problems of communication between consultants, and misunderstanding of the different impacts of symptoms and behaviour in the hospital and home settings.

Most fundamentally, a return to the earlier psychiatric pessimism about long-term illnesses is likely on the part of hospital consultants who deal only with those who relapse.

References

1 Burns, T. The dog that failed to bark. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 361–3.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.