Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T16:37:20.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two heads are better than one

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Phil Steadman*
Affiliation:
Greenwich Recovery Team, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, London, email: phil.steadman@oxleas.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010

An article starting with a quote from Sherlock Holmes always grabs my attention and Burns' article is no exception. Reference Burns1

We made the in-patient/out-patient split in Greenwich in 2006, which resulted in my relinquishing my in-patient work. Initially, I was not at all keen on the idea, for the very reasons laid out by Burns. As time has gone on, however, I have completely changed my mind.

The main positive feature for me is that one has the benefit of a very experienced consultant colleague reviewing the case, including the diagnosis and the management plan. When there is agreement, I feel reassured and move on with improved confidence. When there is a difference of views, I have the opportunity to examine what is being said and to learn from it.

I thought many patients would hate it, but in the 4 years that have elapsed since the change, only one or two have complained to me about it. It has been a helpful change.

References

1 Burns, T. The dog that failed to bark. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 361–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.