Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:43:17.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics of people with severe mental illness who obtain employment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

G. Butler
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
L. Howard
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
S. Choi
Affiliation:
Seoul National University Hospital, Korea
G. Thornicroft
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and method

We explored sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with obtaining employment for people with severe mental illness. Standardised validated interviews and questionnaires were administered to participants who had been recruited into a randomised controlled trial of supported employment.

Results

Older age and diagnosis of schizophrenia were found to be independent predictors of unemployment in the previous year. Other factors of unemployment such as ethnicity and educational level were not associated with obtaining employment.

Clinical implications

Older people and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia may need additional targeted help in obtaining employment if they are to be helped to meet their vocational aims. Further research is needed to determine how this can be done most effectively.

Type
Original Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010

There is growing recognition that work and employment are important in maintaining and enhancing the health and social functioning of people with mental disorders and in promoting social inclusion, in addition to the economic benefits of employment. Reference Boardman, Grove, Perkins and Shepherd1,Reference Cook and Pickett2 However, people with severe mental illness have lower employment rates than those with other psychiatric difficulties. Studies have reported that 8-20% of people with a psychotic disorder obtain employment in the UK, Reference Kelly, McCreadie, MacEwan and Carey35 despite evidence that people with severe mental illness are eager to work and can be successfully employed. Reference Marwaha, Johnson, Bebbington, Stafford, Angermeyer and Brugha6Reference Hatfield, Huxley and Mohamed10 Unemployment rates are also high for patients with affective disorders, although not as high for those with schizophrenia – studies report rates of 35-60% of unemployment. Reference Marwaha and Johnson11Reference Cook and Razzano13

A number of barriers have been identified that may prevent people with severe mental illness from seeking and retaining a job. These range from concern about losing benefits, the belief that they will not be offered employment because of the stigma of mental illness, and worries concerning poor functioning and relapse arising from their mental health problems. Reference Shepherd, Murray and Muijen8,Reference Crowther, Marshall, Bond and Huxley14 The educational achievement of people with severe mental illness is also often low owing to early illness onset, Reference Dion, Tohen, Anthony and Waternaux15 which may also reduce their ability to obtain work.

Previous research has found that in general for people with mental illness, better employment outcomes are connected with younger age. Reference Harrow, Goldberg, Grossman and Meltzer16,Reference Barkow, Maier, Ustun, Gansicke, Wittchen and Heun17 A meta-analysis has also reported that White individuals are significantly more likely than Black and minority ethnic individuals to obtain employment. Reference Barkow, Maier, Ustun, Gansicke, Wittchen and Heun17 However, a study of long-term unemployment in an inner-city setting of adults with severe mental illness by Goldberg et al found that ethnicity was not significantly associated with long-term unemployment. Reference Van Dongen18 There has been little research to establish whether these sociodemographic factors are also associated with employment outcomes in the UK, and we aimed to investigate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with having had a job in the previous year in people with severe mental illness who were being recruited into a randomised controlled trial of supported employment (further information available from the authors). Our hypotheses were as follows.

  1. Participants who have a diagnosis of affective disorder are more likely than those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia to have had some form of employment in the past year.

  2. Participants who have had a higher education are more likely than those who have not to have had some form of employment in the past year.

  3. Younger participants are more likely than older participants to have had some form of employment in the past year.

  4. Black and minority ethnic participants are less likely to have had a job in the past year compared with White participants.

Method

Participants in this study had been recruited for a randomised controlled trial of a supported employment programme: the Supported Work and Needs study (further information available from the authors). The inclusion criteria consisted of severe mental illness (defined as duration of illness over 2 years, a Global Assessment of Functioning score of 60 or below, Reference Nordt, Muller, Rossler and Lauber19 and psychotic or chronic affective disorder), receipt of out-patient or community psychiatric care from local mental health services, age 18-65 years, ability to read and speak English, and unemployment for at least 3 months prior to enrolment in the study. Each participant gave informed written consent.

Participants were recruited from two boroughs in south London: Central Croydon and South Lambeth. The participants' diagnosis was made by a member of the research team at recruitment on the basis of clinical interviews using the Structured Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), Reference Mueser, Salyers and Mueser20 and information from the participants' case notes. At interview the researcher also collected sociodemographic information and gave the participants a job preferences interview, which asked questions concerning the respondent's employment history in the past year, including how many jobs they had had in the past year and the number of months worked, what type of job they ideally would like, and how many hours per week and what hourly payment they would prefer.

Statistical analysis

Univariate associations between sociodemographic characteristics or clinical data and employment in the previous year were carried out using chi-squared tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables to investigate any associations between employment and a number of independent variables. A multiple logistic regression model was fitted to the data to find independent associations among the variables with employment in previous year as the dependent variable.

Results

Table 1 sets out the baseline characteristics of the sample and univariate associations with having had a job in the past year. Overall, 72% of participants had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, 15% had bipolar disorder and 13% had depression (28% affective disorder). The mean age at baseline for women was 40 years (s.d. = 9.17) and for men it was 39 years (s.d. = 9.57). More men (n = 147, 67%) than women (n = 72, 33%) were recruited into the study. The ethnicity of the sample comprised White (n = 80, 37%), Black (n = 98, 45%), Asian (n = 28, 13%) and ‘other’ (n = 12, 5%). Owing to the small numbers in the sample, ethnicity was recoded into White or Black and minority ethnic. Only 32 (15%) participants in total had had a job in the previous year.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample and univariate associations with employment in the past yeara

Had a job in the past year Did not have a job in the past year Association with working Unadjusted OR P
Research diagnosis, n (%)
   Schizophrenia 18 (60) 129 (75) χ2 = 2.716 1.32 0.10
   Affective disorder 12 (40) 44 (25)
Gender, n (%)
   Male 25 (78) 121 (65) χ2 = 2.005 1.89 0.16
   Female 7 (22) 64 (35)
Age, years: mean (s.d.) 34.9 (10.6) 40.18 (9.1) t = 2.988 0.94 0.003
Birthplace, n (%)
   UK 22 (69) 128 (69) χ2 = 0.003 1.02 0.96
   Non-UK 10 (31) 57 (32)
Living situation
   Living alone (with/without children) 12 (37) 105 (68) χ2 = 4.072 2.19 0.04
   Living with others 20 (63) 50 (32)
Education level, n (%)
   Up to secondary education 18 (58) 125 (68) χ2 = 1.072 1.50 0.30
   Tertiary/further education 13 (42) 60 (32)
Ethnicity, n (%)
   White 9 (28) 71 (39) χ2 = 1.328 1.62 0.25
   Black and minority ethnic 23 (72) 112 (61)
Language, n (%)
   National language 26 (81) 159 (86) χ2 = 0.591 1.47 0.44
   Other language 6 (19) 25 (14)

In the univariate analysis, living situation was associated with having had a job in the past year, with those living alone less likely to have had a job compared with those living as a couple or living with others. There was also a trend towards people with affective disorder being more likely than those with schizophrenia to have had a job in the past year.

Table 2 summarises the results of the logistic regression model for the dependent variable ‘had a job in the past year’. After adjusting for the other variables in the model, it was found that participants who were older were significantly less likely to have had a job in the past year than their younger counterparts (P<0.05). Participants with a diagnosis of affective disorder were significantly more likely (OR = 3.22, 95% CI 1.24-8.31) to have had a job in the past year than those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (P = 0.016).

Table 2 Associations with working in the past year (multiple logistic regressions)

Adjusted OR (95% CI) P
Age 0.942 (0.901–0.985) 0.009
Male v. female 1.981 (0.730–5.385) 0.180
Other language v. national language 1.883 (0.628–5.650) 0.259
Affective disorder v. schizophrenia 3.215 (1.244–8.309) 0.016
Lives with others v. lives alone 1.607 (0.676–3.819) 0.282
Primary/secondary education v. tertiary/further education 1.477 (0.609–3.581) 0.388
White v. Black and minority ethnic 2.103 (0.810–5.463) 0.127

Discussion

We found that younger age and a diagnosis of affective disorder are independently associated with having had a job in the past year. Older age therefore appears to be a barrier to employment. This is consistent with previous research in which younger age is predictive of better vocational outcomes. Reference Wewiorski and Fabian21 We also found that people with a diagnosis of affective disorder (bipolar disorder or depression) are more likely to have had a job in the past year than those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Again, this is consistent with previous research, which has indicated that people diagnosed with schizophrenia have worse employment outcomes than those with other diagnoses, and also that people diagnosed with affective disorders have better vocational outcomes generally than others. Reference Barkow, Maier, Ustun, Gansicke, Wittchen and Heun17 Ethnicity and educational level were not significantly associated with employment in the previous year although there was a trend for White participants to be more likely to have had employment compared with Black and minority ethnic participants. This may reflect racial discrimination in society in general, and the effect of mental illness and ethnicity may need further investigation.

Limitations of the study

This study has a number of methodological limitations. First, the data on employment were collected retrospectively and were not validated, although there is no reason to believe systematic bias is likely. Second, numbers in individual subgroups were small and we therefore may not have had the statistical power to detect differences. Third, other confounders that were not measured may play a part here, for example employment interventions available to patients, attitudes of different healthcare professionals to working with people with severe mental illness and length of unemployment. Finally, the population studied may not accurately represent unemployed people with severe mental illness because the original inclusion criteria for the trial were that individuals had to have been unemployed for 3 months prior to entry and were being selected for a supported work scheme, thus introducing bias into the sample.

Nevertheless, this study does confirm that diagnosis is independently associated with poorer employment outcomes, as is older age. We cannot know from these data whether this is due to stigma encountered by the participants as has been described in a qualitative study, Reference Shepherd, Murray and Muijen8 to cognitive deficits as suggested by some researchers, Reference Goldberg, Lucksted, McNary, Gold, Dixon and Lehman22 or to low levels of motivation. It is not clear how best to help such people, as interventions that can be effective - particularly supported employment Reference Endicott, Spitzer, Fleiss and Cohen23 - may be less effective in this patient group. Further research is needed to determine the most effective vocational intervention for older patients and people with schizophrenia.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None.

References

1 Boardman, J, Grove, B, Perkins, R, Shepherd, G. Work and employment for people with psychiatric disabilities. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182: 467–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Cook, JA, Pickett, SA. Recent trends in vocational rehabilitation for people with psychiatric disability. Am J Psych Rehab 1995; 20: 212.Google Scholar
3 Kelly, C, McCreadie, RG, MacEwan, T, Carey, S. Nithsdale schizophrenia surveys. 17. Fifteen year review. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172: 513–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 UK700 Group. Comparison of intensive and standard case management for patients with psychosis. Rationale of the trial. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 74–8.Google Scholar
5 Marwaha, S, Johnson, S, Bebbington, P, Stafford, M, Angermeyer, MC, Brugha, T, et al. Rates and correlates of employment in people with schizophrenia in the UK, France and Germany. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 30–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Shepherd, G, Murray, A, Muijen, M. Relative Values: The Different Views of Users, Family Carers and Professionals on Services for People with Schizophrenia. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 1994.Google Scholar
7 Hatfield, B, Huxley, P, Mohamed, H. Accommodation and employment: a survey into the circumstances and expressed needs of users of mental health services in a northern town. Br J Soc Work 1992; 22: 6073.Google Scholar
8 Marwaha, S, Johnson, S. Views and experiences of employment among people with psychosis: a qualitative descriptive study. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2005; 51: 302–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Cook, JA, Razzano, L. Vocational rehabilitation for persons with schizophrenia: recent research and implications for practice. Schizophr Bull 2000; 26: 87103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Crowther, R, Marshall, M, Bond, G, Huxley, P. Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Update Software, 2001 (2).Google Scholar
11 Dion, GL, Tohen, M, Anthony, WA, Waternaux, CS. Symptoms and functioning of patients with bipolar disorder six months after hospitalization. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1998; 39: 652–7.Google Scholar
12 Harrow, M, Goldberg, JF, Grossman, LS, Meltzer, HY. Outcome in manic disorders. A naturalistic follow-up study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47: 665–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Barkow, K, Maier, W, Ustun, TB, Gansicke, M, Wittchen, HU, Heun, R. Risk factors for depression at 12-month follow-up in adult primary health care patients with major depression: an international prospective study. J Affect Disord 2003; 76: 157–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Van Dongen, CJ. Quality of life and self-esteem in working and nonworking persons with mental illness. Community Ment Health J 1996; 32: 535–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Nordt, C, Muller, B, Rossler, W, Lauber, C. Predictors and course of vocational status, income, and quality of life in people with severe mental illness: a naturalistic study. Soc Sci Med 2007; 65: 1420–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Mueser, K, Salyers, M, Mueser, P. A prospective analysis of work in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2001; 27: 281–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Wewiorski, N, Fabian, E. Association between demographic and diagnostic factors and employment outcomes for people with psychiatric disabilities: a synthesis of recent research. Ment Health Serv Res 2004; 6: 921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Goldberg, RW, Lucksted, A, McNary, S, Gold, JM, Dixon, L, Lehman, A. Correlates of long-term unemployment among inner-city adults with serious and persistent mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 101–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Endicott, J, Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JL, Cohen, J. The Global Assessment Scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 766–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 World Health Organization Division of Mental Health. SCAN Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, Version 1.0. WHO, 1992.Google Scholar
21 Burke-Miller, JK, Cook, JA, Grey, DD, Razzano, LA, Blyler, CR, Leff, HS, et al. Demographic characteristics and employment among people with severe mental illness in a multisite study. Community Ment Health J 2006; 42: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Wykes, T, Reeder, C, Landau, S, Everitt, B, Knapp, M, Patel, A, et al. Cognitive remediation therapy in schizophrenia. Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 421–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Burns, T, Catty, J, Becker, T, Drake, RE, Fioritti, A, Knapp, M, et al. The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 1146–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample and univariate associations with employment in the past yeara

Figure 1

Table 2 Associations with working in the past year (multiple logistic regressions)

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.