Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T02:37:32.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WPBA or CASC/OSCE: where is it going wrong?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sudip Sikdar*
Affiliation:
Clinical Director, Royal College of Psychiatrists' Examiner, and Regional Advisor Mersey, Merseycare NHS Trust, Liverpool. Email: sudip.sikdar@merseycare.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010

I have been involved in all aspects of training and workplace-based assessment (WPBA) as a consultant, chair of annual review of competence progression panels and a Royal College of Psychiatrists' examiner for the past 6 years, and experience the problems discussed by Menon et al Reference Menon, Winston and Sullivan1 and commentators Reference Babu, Htike and Cleak2,Reference Oyebode3 regularly. The inherent weaknesses of WPBAs have been well documented in these studies, but one also needs to seriously consider why trainees who are proclaimed as competent in clinical skills (as evidenced by successful WBPAs) are performing so poorly at the College's Clinical Assessment of Skills and Competences (CASC) exam, where the success rate has dropped to less than a third?

As an examiner, I sometimes have been exasperated at the poor standards of performance in the recent CASCs where problems have been evident in all aspects of clinical and communication skills (knowing, knowing how, showing how and doing). Is that a reflection of failure of training systems and assessments (WBPA) or should the obvious conclusion be that there is no correlation between demonstrating competence in clinical practice and performing in an exam (something many may argue has been present all the time)? Should we then do away with the final exam altogether (as run-through training under Modernising Medical Careers may allow in some specialties) or return to the old-fashioned part II clinical exam which some (examiners and trainees alike) may argue was a better test of clinical competence and, more importantly, excellence? These are very important questions that the College and the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board need to consider, as one should not lose sight of the ultimate goal (becoming a specialist/consultant) of being in a postgraduate medical training programme in any specialty.

Following Lord Darzi's recent review of the National Health Service (NHS), 4 it has become ever so important for consultants to be at the forefront of driving quality in the modern-day NHS, something that will be difficult to achieve if we do not produce adequate numbers of quality-trained consultants. This may paradoxically suit many strategic health authorities, primary care trusts and NHS trusts! Many medical managers like me are constantly put under pressure to reduce medical costs (there is anecdotal evidence that consultant posts are not being advertised or retiring consultants are not being replaced throughout the country). As consultants remain relatively expensive units, it would suit the NHS ultimately to have fewer. New Ways of Working 5 is another tool of reducing consultant workload and perhaps ultimately numbers. Thus, if we continue with the current framework of training and assessment, we may inadvertently be facilitating that process.

References

1 Menon, S, Winston, M, Sullivan, G. Workplace-based assessment: survey of psychiatric trainees in Wales. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 468–74.Google Scholar
2 Babu, KS, Htike, MM, Cleak, VE. Workplace-based assessments in Wessex: the first 6 months. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 474–8.Google Scholar
3 Oyebode, F. Competence or excellence? Invited commentary on … Workplace-based assessments in Wessex and Wales. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 478–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Lord Darzi. High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. TSO (The Stationery Office), 2008.Google Scholar
5 Department of Health. New Ways of Working for Psychiatrists: Enhancing Effective, Person-Centred Services through New Ways of Working in Multidisciplinary and Multiagency Contexts. TSO (The Stationery Office), 2005.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.