Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:37:16.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attitudes to ECT – a nebulous concept with important implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Schalk W. du Toit*
Affiliation:
ST6 General Adult Psychiatry, NHS Grampian, Royal Cornhill Hospital, Aberdeen, UK, email: s_dutoit@doctors.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010

Kinnair et al Reference Kinnair, Dawson and Perera1 raise some important points regarding training and teaching students on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Some of the questions used, particularly in assessing students' attitudes to ECT, have been used in similar studies Reference Clothier, Freeman and Snow2,Reference Abbas, Mashrai and Mohanna3 and would therefore carry some face validity. Clearly, it is important to consider the sequence of teaching events in any instructional design of a teaching block; however, I would disagree with some of the authors' conclusions. With such a descriptive study design, the use of binary variables (yes/no answers) and the absence of P-values, one cannot infer any significant differences between Groups A, B, C and D with regard to changes in knowledge of ECT. The relatively smaller sample sizes of these groups compared with the baseline sample would make a Type I error more likely, that is any differences seen could be due to chance.

Intuitively, one would expect either Group B or C to do better with their follow-up knowledge questions, simply based on constructivist theory (i.e. building on previously attained knowledge). In Group B, a certain amount of knowledge will be acquired from simply watching an ECT procedure. The authors did not state how soon after the lecture and/or witnessed ECT event, students were asked to complete the questionnaire. One cannot therefore assume a limited benefit (in terms of knowledge obtained) from watching ECT before receiving a lecture, as this could equally be due to having the lecture closer to the questionnaire.

I find the absence of any tables to explain the results of their attitudes questions somewhat disappointing. Previous research in this area has shown that medical students' attitudes to ECT can be improved by receiving a didactic lecture on ECT, Reference Papakosta, Zervas, Pehlivanidis, Papadimitriou and Papakostas4 as well as observing an ECT application (either live or a pre-recorded video), Reference Warnell, Duk, Christison and Haviland5 so it is not surprising that Group B showed improved attitudes on two of the questions compared with Group D. It would have been interesting to know how many of those students who had seen either One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest or Beautiful Mind belonged to Groups A or D, which could explain the different response with regard to question 10 - ‘I would agree to have ECT if I was depressed’.

Better knowledge of ECT, particularly self-perceived knowledge, does not necessarily imply better attitudes to ECT. Reference Gazdag, Kocsis-Ficzere and Tolna6 If we want to attract more students to our profession, further research in this area is essential to help unveil some of the secrets behind students' negative perceptions, attitudes and prejudices with regard to ECT.

References

1 Kinnair, D, Dawson, S, Perera, R. Electroconvulsive therapy: medical students' attitudes and knowledge. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 54–7.Google Scholar
2 Clothier, JL, Freeman, T, Snow, L. Medical student attitudes and knowledge about ECT. J ECT 2001; 17: 99101.Google Scholar
3 Abbas, M, Mashrai, N, Mohanna, M. Knowledge of and attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy of medical students in the United kingdom, Egypt, and Iraq: a transcultural perspective. J ECT 2007; 23: 260–4.Google Scholar
4 Papakosta, VM, Zervas, IM, Pehlivanidis, A, Papadimitriou, GN, Papakostas, YG. A survey of the attitudes of Greek medical students toward electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT 2005; 21: 162–4.Google Scholar
5 Warnell, RL, Duk, AD, Christison, GW, Haviland, MG. Teaching electroconvulsive therapy to medical students: effects of instructional method on knowledge and attitudes. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 433–6.Google Scholar
6 Gazdag, G, Kocsis-Ficzere, N, Tolna, J. Hungarian medical students' knowledge about and attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT 2005; 21: 96–9.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.