Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:07:05.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulated patients – stimulated patients?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul J. Whelan*
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, email: paul.whelan@nhs.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011

Mitchison & Khanna Reference Mitchison and Khanna1 contribute an interesting letter to The Psychiatrist about the experience of role-playing actors, or simulated patients, who have become ubiquitous in OSCE-based examinations (such as the CASC) in medicine and psychiatry. Using qualitative methods, they briefly describe aspects of the simulated patients’ experience, but focus on one: the emotional stress the actors can experience after role-playing psychiatric patients repeatedly over the course of an examination.

The role of simulated patients in psychiatric OSCEs is a lightly researched topic. We conducted a study in 2009 looking at the role in examinations of the same population that Mitchison & Khanna describe, i.e. UK MRCPsych trainees. Reference Whelan, Church and Kadry2 One finding was that simulated patients and examiners scored ‘empathy’ and ‘communication’ differently (unlike the real examination, we asked the actors to mark the candidates). In a post-hoc unpublished exploration of why this might be (by using a questionnaire with both groups), we were unable to find the answer to this question.

Having read Michison & Khanna's letter, I wonder whether the answer to the question lies in the emotionally distressed state the actor puts him or herself into while acting the role, and the perception of the candidate not responding to this sufficiently; whereas the examiner, who is not emotionally aroused, is less likely to down-score the candidate.

It is a pity that Mitchison & Khanna's findings were not published in a full-length article because I would like to know more.

References

1 Mitchison, S, Khanna, P. Role players' experience of psychiatric examinations. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 542–3.Google Scholar
2 Whelan, P, Church, L, Kadry, K. Using standardized patientss marks in scoring postgraduate psychiatry OSCEs. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33: 319–22.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.