Having studied both the Book of Job and the Bhagavad Gita, I find it difficult to agree with John Price that either Job or Arjuna ‘suffered from depression’.1
These mythical, rather than historical, characters were temporarily unhappy, yes; even miserable; but by no means hopeless, helpless or worthless. They were not described as experiencing diurnal mood variation, sleep or appetite disturbance, or reduced concentration. In terms of emotion, a healthy degree of awe and wonder can be deduced, particularly in the case of Arjuna. It is equally unwise, in my view, to read as much into the text as to say that Arjuna ‘had a typical panic attack’. There is very little that is typical about either Job or Arjuna!
Nevertheless, although I take issue with Dr Price on questions about diagnosis, I do consider valid and valuable his observation that ‘those treating depressed agnostics should look for a secular equivalent to joyous total surrender to God’.
For a number of years I acted as an independent medical examiner for insurance companies, and assessed dozens of people claiming income protection insurance through being unable to work on the grounds of psychiatric illness and disability. Often, feeling undervalued and exploited in an occupation which was central to their sense of identity, they were now (with few exceptions) without any vital sense of purpose; beaten, angry, resentful and bewildered, sure only that they could not go back into the workplace to risk further humiliation and insult. Many avoided human society altogether, with symptoms of anxiety, depression, panic attacks while away from home, agoraphobia and social phobia. They also avoided psychiatric services, and therefore help, deeming it further humiliation to be considered mentally ill.
Men and women were more or less equally represented, and it was also striking that not one expressed any religious belief or connection, or undertook any kind of even secular spiritual practice on a regular or frequent basis.
I believe that human experience needs interpreting according to five seamlessly connected dimensions: physical, biological, psychological, social and spiritual. I further believe in routinely including the spiritual dimension when assessing psychiatric patients. John Price seems to be pointing in a similar direction.
Spirituality and religion are linked, but can be distinguished and detached from one another. People tend to take relatively fixed positions on both and concerning the relationship between them, but the distinctions are subtle. It can often boil down to a question of language, rather than substance. The words ‘God’, ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality’, for example, have very different meanings for different people. A person’s spirituality concerns whatever is most meaningful to them, at the deepest level, whether couched in terms that are religious or secular. If there is a void, then that too is part - often a key part - of the presenting problem. Such a void first needs detecting and then healing. In this, even if it does not reach the magnitude of Price’s ‘joyous total surrender’, some kind of improved degree of acceptance in the face of adversity and loss is frequently the first and most decisive step.
- Royal College of Psychiatrists