Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:31:24.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UK extended Medical Assessment Programme for ex-service personnel: the first 150 individuals seen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ian P. Palmer*
Affiliation:
The Baird Medical Centre, Gassiot House, St Thomas' Hospital, London
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and method

To describe an interim service set up to examine the breadth of UK ex-service personnel's concerns in relation to their mental health and military service and provide a record of the first 150 individuals assessed following conformation of military service and examination of all available military and civilian medical records.

Results

The majority of attendees were White male ex-soldiers. Average age, service and time to assessment were 44.5, 15.8 and 11.7 years respectively. Two-thirds were receiving help from the National Health Service and ex-service nongovernmental organisations. Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder were similar to previous UK studies. Obsessional symptoms were of relevance to the clinical presentation in a third. Fabrication and/or exaggeration occurred in about 10%.

Clinical implications

The spread of diagnoses and delay in help-seeking are similar to civilians. The link between mental disorders and military service is seldom straightforward and fabrication or exaggeration is difficult for civilians to recognise. Verification and contextualisation of service using contemporaneous service medical records is important given the possible occupational origin of mental health conditions.

Type
Current Practice
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2012

Each nation has a unique relationship with its armed forces. In Britain the relationship has never been straightforward and even today continues to influence how veterans are viewed. Reference Barnett1,Reference Anderson2 The term ‘veteran’ is defined differently by different nations. Reference Dandeker, Wessely, Iversen and Ross3 The UK government has opted for a socially inclusive designation whereby a UK veteran has to have served 1 paid day alone; thus even those who do not complete basic training are included. The US military has a large body of research on veterans, but caution is required in interpretation and its lessons may not be transferable to the UK. Reference Iversen and Greenberg4,Reference Freuh, Elhai, Gold, Monnier, Magruder and Keane5 Currently, UK veterans are ‘thought’ to number 3.8 million, a figure expected to decline by over 50% by 2027 through death of veterans over 65. Reference Woodhead, Sloggett, Bray, Bradbury, McManus and Meltzer6 Approximately 20 000 individuals leave UK armed forces annually, around 5000 from the untrained staff. Roughly 2000 receive medical discharges, of which about 150 are for mental illness, including about 20 for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 7 The term ‘veteran’ is value-laden with personal, social, cultural, spiritual, financial, legal and political dimensions and ageist overtones. It is disliked by many ex-service personnel. I shall therefore use the term ex-service person/personnel (ESP) in this paper.

Few pause to consider potential bias in popular media and literary narratives that inform civilian understanding of the military world. Reference Brian8 In addition to current psychological fashions and paradigms, professional understanding of mental health problems in ESP is also shaped by sources which may fuel media speculation about the inevitability of psychological damage in soldiers returning from operations, Reference Macintyre9-Reference Midgley11 despite clear evidence that the majority of UK military personnel, although enduring arduous operational duties, neither develop psychiatric injuries Reference Hotopf, Hull, Fear, Browne, Horn and Iversen12 nor are more prone to violent crime resulting in a custodial sentence. 13 Some do, however, develop mental health or behavioural problems such as alcohol misuse, risk-taking and depression as well as experiencing social exclusion. Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin14,Reference Iversen, Nikalous, Greenberg, Unwin, Hull and Hotopf15

To add to our knowledge of the physical or mental health of this heterogeneous population, the government set up six National Health Service (NHS) pilot sites; created the Reserves Mental Health Programme (RMHP); developed an interim extension of the Medical Assessment Programme (MAP); extended priority NHS treatment for ESP; and highlighted mental health issues of serving, reserve and ex-service personnel in its publications New Horizons 16 and NHS Choices. 7 The Health and Social Care Advisory Service (HASCAS) estimated that, on the basis of discharge rates from the armed forces, a general practitioner (GP) is likely to see one new ESP with a mental health problem every 3 to 7 years; 16 the evaluation of the six Community Mental Health Pilots for Veterans of the Armed Forces is available online. Reference Dent-Brown, Ashworth, Barkham, Connell, Gilbody and Hardy17

Since 1993, the MAP has been a free national service aiming to provide a ‘foundation for developing research questions and hypotheses’ through clinical assessment. Reference Murphy18 It has always been the role of the MAP to add detail to the epidemiology. Until 2006, the MAP was staffed by consultant physicians who sent individuals identified with possible mental health problems elsewhere for assessment. Telephone advice and guidance has always been available free of charge. The MAP offers a mental health assessment and a pledge to ‘listen’ actively to ESP who believe their mental health problems may have been affected by military service since 1982, to get a better understanding of their needs, demography and any relationship with service. Ex-service personnel have become a politicised group and a number of them had involved their Member of Parliament in their plight. Assessments are currently undertaken by an ex-military consultant psychiatrist. The service is unique, in that there are no constraints, other than physical, on the duration of the consultation, in an attempt to understand the breadth of ESP narratives which can span the personal, social, political, spiritual and even philosophical domains. Reference Pankratz, Halligan, Bass and Oakley19

Method

This paper is a descriptive clinic-based study of the first 150 British military ESP from 1982 who believed their mental health problems may have been attributable to operational military service. They represent ESP seeking help for an identified need. Access to the service is limited to UK veterans. Proof of service is sought from the appropriate manning and records services in all cases. Referral is through a health professional alone and in all cases the individual's GP is involved; there is no self-referral. All ESP contacting the MAP were asked to get their GP to refer them. All military and NHS medical records were obtained and reviewed before consultation. All individuals were offered a consultation without constraint of time by an experienced ex-military clinician. Partners/carers were encouraged to attend. Physical conditions encountered had already been competently examined, investigated and treated by the GP. The same report was sent to the individual and their GP and included the appropriate ICD-10 diagnoses based on the history alone. For the past 12 years the same anonymous exit questionnaire has been given at completion of the consultation about the users’ experience.

At the time of writing this paper, there have been three studies of UK ex-service personnel by the ‘King's group’ at King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London. Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin14,Reference Iversen, Nikalous, Greenberg, Unwin, Hull and Hotopf15,Reference Iversen, van Staden, Hacker Hughes, Browne, Greenberg and Hotopf20 Unlike the self-selecting MAP cohort, these studies have the benefit of being random samples on defined cohorts. Where there are data from the King's 2005 study Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin14 they are included for interest and comparison in the tables.

Since 1993, all MAP attendees have been asked to give written consent to their anonymised data being used in research for the benefit of other veterans. No individual veteran can be identified from data in this paper and none declined to give written consent. Although the MAP has been funded by the UK Ministry of Defence since 1993, it is an independent service and not part of the UK Defence Medical Services (DMS). All records are held separate from any Ministry of Defence, DMS or NHS service and conform to the Data Protection Act.

Results

Telephone and email contact with the service increased 95% over the period of 18 months, unrelated to the 150 cases. Enquiries and advice were sought by ESP, their friends and families, GPs, mental health professionals, researchers and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). As individuals came from across the UK, the average consultation lasted 2.9 h, attempted in one setting. Each consultation required an average administration time of 3.7 h (total 6.6 h). The response rate to the anonymous exit questionnaire was 95%. Response was diminished when forms were taken home to complete. Almost all service users (99%) stated that their concerns had been addressed to their satisfaction during the consultation. When individuals were contacted by letter and invited to update the MAP about their situation 6 months after attendance, the response rate was in the order of 15%, which was still better than an earlier response rate from GPs for information on attendees’ progress (∼10%). A random selection of 15% of the cases was reviewed with colleagues and discussion confirmed the diagnostic categories in those cases studied. The individuals seen did not require extensive telephone contact with GP or other agencies, which may relate to the time taken to identify their concerns and the provision of a formulation for both ESP and GP.

General demographics

The sample was predominately White male (97%), average age 45 years, of whom 62% were in a stable relationship (Table 1). Over half were employed (52%) and in contact with service charities (51%); 55% had a war pension. An equal number had either no or higher qualifications (25%). Nearly a third (27%) had contact with civil or military criminal justice systems, of which 53% were in combat arms (infantry, armour) and 3% (5/150) in prison. Of the 80% with alcohol misuse, a quarter had resulting problems in relationships (24%) and problems with the law (23%). Further, 20% of the sample had self-harmed, 97% had mental health problems with or without physical health problems, and 3% had physical health problems alone. The time from discharge to assessment was on average 12 years. Only a third had not sought help for their problems before the referral. Two-thirds were receiving help from primary or secondary care services and/or ex-service NGOs, for example Combat Stress. About 45% of those had seen a psychiatrist and 26% a clinical psychologist; 54% had received antidepressants and 24% cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) or eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR). The majority (65%) had received two or more psychiatric diagnoses, of which 42% were unrelated to service; in only 20% was the link unequivocal. About one in five individuals had unequivocal record of involvement with military mental health services before discharge, of whom 67% had received NHS follow-up.

TABLE 1 Sample characteristics

MAP,
n = 150
n (%)
King's group
study,Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin 14
n = 315, %
Gender
    Male 145 (97) 87
    Female 5 (3) 12
Mean age, years 45 39
Mean time from leaving
service, years
12
Marital status
    Married 70 (47) 52
    Partnership 23 (15) 9
    Separated/divorced 24 (15) 23
    Single 33 (23) 16
Employment status
    Employed 78 (52) 84
    Unemployed 67 (45) 16
    Retired/other 5 (3)
Qualifications
    High 37 (25) 18
    None 34 (23)
Military mental health input 27 (19)
Corroborated
8
Uncorroborated
    Subsequent NHS follow-up 18 (67)
Current mental health input
(n=150)
89 (59) 58
    Psychiatrist 65 (43) 29
    Clinical psychologist 38 (25) 8
Treatment offered
    Antidepressants 78 (52) 70
    CBT/EMDR 35 (23) 4
Ex-service NGO involvement 77 (51) 28
War pension 82 (55)
Criminal justice system
involvement
41 (27)
    Civilian record alone 25 (61)
    Combat arms (army) 23 (53)
    In prison 5 (12)
Alcohol misuse 120 (80)
    And problems with criminal
    justice system
27 (23)
    And problems in
    relationships
29 (24)
Self-harm 30 (20)
Number of diagnoses
of psychiatric disorder
    1 53 (35)
    ⩾2 97 (65) ‘Many’

CBT, cognitive-behavioural therapy; EMDR, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing; MAP, Medical Assessment Programme; NGO, non-governmental organisation; NHS, National Health Service.

Military demographics

Of the 150 MAP service users, 87% were army; half (55%) were non-commissioned officers, a third were enlisted ranks (35%) and 10% were officers (Table 2). The majority had left voluntarily (63%) after an average service of 15.8 years. With regard to operational experience, 11% had never deployed operationally, but 32% had deployed three or more times. Whereas 38% of the operations were combat operations, 62% were operations other than war (e.g. peacemaking, peacekeeping, humanitarian aid, aid to the civil powers). Iraq, Northern Ireland, the Balkans and the Falklands were the most frequent operational theatres, and 5% of the sample had been to Afghanistan. Of the 133 individuals who had been involved in various operations, 16% had been involved in direct combat and 20% in violent action short of combat; 29% witnessed the death or the body of a comrade and 14% had been unwell or injured on operations.

TABLE 2 Military characteristics of sample

MAP,
n = 150
n (%)
King's group
study,Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin 14
n = 315, %
Service
    Army 130 (87) 79
    Royal Navy/Marines 8 (6) 6
    RAF 12 (8) 12
Rank on exit
    Officer 15 (10) 13
    NCO (senior and junior) 82 (55) 65
    Other ranks 53 (35) 22
Mode of exit
    Voluntary 94 (63)
    Involuntary 56 (37)
Average length of service,
years
16 14
Operational deployments
    Nil 17 (11) 11
    1-2 85 (57) 89
    ⩾3 48 (32)
Types of operations (n = 191)
    Combat operations 73 (38)
    Operations other than warFootnote a 118 (62)
Theatres of operations
    Iraq (all operations) 95 83
    Northern Ireland 82
    Balkans 69 32
    Falklands conflict 25
    Afghanistan 8
    Others 31
Operational exposure (n = 133)
    Direct combat and related
    action
21 (16)
    Violent action short
    of combat
27 (20)
    Witness to comrade's death
    or corpse
38 (29)
    Injury/illness on operations 19 (14)
Trade (n = 130)
    Combat and combat
    support armsFootnote b
89 (69)
    Combat service support
    armsFootnote c
41 (32)

NCO, non-commissioned officer; RAF, Royal Air Force.

a. Peacemaking, peacekeeping, humanitarian aid, aid to the civil powers.

b. Infantry, armour, signals, engineers, air corps, intelligence, medics.

c. Logistics, electrical and mechanical engineers, administration, medical, etc.

Diagnoses

Most attendees had two or more diagnoses (Table 1). Nearly half the diagnoses were anxiety based (48%) and a fifth were related to alcohol or substance misuse (19%) (Table 3). About 15% of the diagnoses were of PTSD, of which 89% had a comorbid diagnosis: 48% depression, 40% alcohol misuse/dependency, 13% obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Approximately 11% had OCD alone, of whom 38% had depression, 28% alcohol misuse and 16% comorbid PTSD. Finally, 38% (9/24) of the personality disorders were anankastic. Obsessional traits, particularly rumination, were of relevance to the clinical presentation in up to 30% of the cohort and were coded under Z in the table. A number of individuals had histories suggestive of dyslexia. Psychotic and organic disorders were uncommon.

TABLE 3 ICD-10 diagnoses

MAP,
n = 305
n (%)
King's group
study,Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin 14
n = 313, %
Organic (F0) 2 (0.7)
Psychoactive substance use (F1)
    Misuse 33 (11)
    Dependency 15 (5) 37 (12)
    Substances 11 (4)
Schizophrenia, schizotypal and
delusional disorders (F2)
4 (1)
Mood (affective) disorders (F3)
    Bipolar affective disorder 6 (2)
    Depressive-spectrum
    disorders
44 (14) 167 (53)
Neurotic, stress-related and
somatoform disorders (F4)
147 (48) 18 (18)
    PTSD 45 (15) 51 (16)
    Obsessive-compulsive
    disorder
32 (11)
    Somatoform disorders 9 (3)
Non-organic sleep disorders
(F51)
8 (3)
Disorders of adult personality
and behaviour (F6)
24 (8)
    Anankastic 9 (3)
Disorders of psychological
development (F8)
7 (2)
Factors influencing health
status and contact with health
services (Z73) (n = 150)
45 (15)

PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.

Discussion

This is a clinic-based study on a self-selecting group of ESP seeking help. It adds detail to the first examination of a random cohort of British ex-service Gulf War ESP from the First Gulf War by Iversen et al in 2005 (the King's group study). Reference Iversen, Dyson, Smith, Greenberg, Walwyn and Unwin14 Attendees of MAP received a face-to-face interview, without constraint of time, from an experienced military psychiatrist after prior scrutiny of civilian and military medical records. In contrast, the King's study was a structured phone interview by civilian research staff supported by serving military medical personnel.

The demographic details give a clearer picture of the sort of ESP seeking help through the NHS. Despite the army being half of UK armed forces, 87% of the MAP users were ex-soldiers. The mode of exit and length of service give valuable information as to resilience as well as personality difficulties. The theatres, types and tempo of operations change with time. In a few years it is unlikely that any British soldiers will not have deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan. Even on current operations, although not every soldier engages in combat action, they may witness the injury, death or dead body of a colleague. Only a minority of the MAP patients were injured on operations, but this may change with time. The majority of those in trouble with civil or military criminal justice systems were from the army, particularly those in combat arms. Alcohol misuse remains a common issue for serving and ex-serving soldiers. In this sample, ESP engaged with health services – nearly half had seen a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist and an increasing number received psychotherapy. Attributions of a clear link between military service and subsequent mental disorder are problematic. 21 Consultations revealed high levels of negative stereotyping of civilian health practitioners and services.

The MAP sample reflected the 2005 King's study in age, marital status, service, rank on exit, average length of service, number of operational tours and being in receipt of mental health input. In terms of diagnoses both cohorts were similar: most had more than one diagnosis Reference Hoge, Lesikar, Guevara, Lange, Brundage and Engel22 and the majority had not been seen by a mental health professional before leaving service. The diagnostic rates of PTSD were similar to both the King's and previous MAP studies. Reference Lee, Gabriel, Bolton, Bale and Jackson23 Unlike the King's 2005 cohort, however, diagnoses were more commonly neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (ICD-10 F4) rather than mood disorders (ICD-10 F3). Substance misuse and obsessive-compulsive symptoms were common. Personality difficulties and/or disorders were not uncommon and seldom mentioned by referrers. More MAP attendees had been in contact with defence psychiatric services before leaving; more had received CBT; more were unemployed and more were in contact with service charities, as one might expect. Fewer women attended the MAP and fewer individuals had received antidepressants.

This is a continuous sample, unlikely to be representative of the whole UK ESP population, although likely to reflect those already seeking help from the NHS, including the UK pilot sites, and the ex-service NGO Combat Stress. It includes those seeking compensation or other benefits. It is likely to have missed those who isolate themselves from society, those who feel ashamed at their condition, those who preclude themselves from attending out of pride or who minimise their difficulties. Socially excluded ESP, those without GPs, those unable to travel to London, those who do not want to be seen by a government service, those who do not want their service record to be scrutinised, those with paranoia and those with ‘difficult’ personalities may all be missed. The MAP has been used to identify areas for further research and hypotheses. There was no specific design as the extension was not a scientific study, rather an information-gathering exercise. The use of psychometrics and diagnostic instruments would be desirable in future and would improve diagnostic reliability, but extra time would have to be factored in and repeat appointments funded. Screening measures could be sent by post in advance of assessment, which is now being trialled. A measure of personality would be particularly helpful and exploration into obsessive-compulsive spectrum symptoms would seem to be warranted. Although subject to all the usual caveats in regard to clinical evaluation, unlike usual consultations, on average 3 h was spent with individuals after all service and NHS medical records were read. This allowed a wide-ranging discussion and evaluation of needs. Unfortunately, a non-responder bias analysis for either exit questionnaire of 6-monthly follow-up was not undertaken.

Issues unique to ex-service personnel's narratives

There are over 140 trades in the British Army and, in most armed forces, an individual's job is integral to their identity. It is therefore important to contextualise ESP narratives. Different trades put different individuals and groups into differing brackets of risk. Each operational theatre provides unique physical and psychological threats, which vary across the geographical area of an operation and change with time. Those most frequently in dangerous situations are the combat arms and combat service arms. These are the infantry soldiers, tank crews and their direct supporting arms such as artillery, medics, signallers, engineers and air support at ‘the sharp end’. They are serviced by combat service support arms that include logistics, administrative, transport, electrical and mechanical engineers. The combat arms form about 25% of the army but less in the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force (RAF). Although members of UK armed forces are frequently ‘in harm's way’, only a minority ‘close with the enemy’. In this cohort, of those who had had operational exposure, 16% had been in direct combat-related action and 20% in violent action short of combat. Nearly a third (29%) reported witnessing the death or the corpse of a comrade.

It is believed by most in the ex-service community that most individuals serve their time, are proud of their service and leave in good health. The social structure of military service acts as a potent ‘container’ of individuals with difficulties. Reference Palmer24 In situations when this internal, horizontal and vertical support structure fails or is lost on leaving, individuals may have problems. Some end up in civil or military criminal justice systems, some in civilian and/or defence medical services. The mode of exit from UK armed forces can give valuable information about an individual's relationship with the military: 37% of the MAP cohort was involuntarily separated from service, not necessarily against their will. Involuntary separation means discharge on either medical or administrative grounds. Administrative discharge includes imposed redundancy, compassion, poor work, criminality, other disciplinary reasons and behavioural problems. Only 3% of MAP users were assessed in prison, which reflects the Defence Analytic Services and Advice (DASA) statistics, 13 and about a third reported involvement with civil and/or military criminal justice systems.

Medical discharge only occurs after a full occupational medical assessment and medical board. Some conditions may not be serious, although they may interfere with an individual's ability to undertake their workplace duties, but are likely to improve on exit, yet others will be severe and enduring. It is important that those individuals entitled receive their due. In this study, 55% of the MAP cohort were in receipt of a war pension. Those medically discharged are entitled to financial recompense when their condition is ‘attributable to service’, some of which may be exempt of tax, and medications for the condition are free.

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms

The important finding for those involved in assessing and treating serving and ex-serving personnel is the frequency of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and personality traits in these populations which, to date, seem to have been underexplored. Slater Reference Slater25 noted that obsessional neurosis in soldiers seemed to be more closely associated with pre-existent personality traits than most other neurotic disorders. Of occupationally successful submariners in the US Navy cohort, 9% met criteria for obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, Reference Moes, Lall and Johnson26 and one study found that officers may be more likely to possess obsessional ‘features’ than other ranks. Reference Christen and Moore27 In another study, obsessive-compulsive, depressive and anxiety symptoms were more common in a cohort of Chinese officers over 30 years of age. Reference Fu-Rong and Ya-Lin28

The lifetime prevalence of OCD in the general population is about 2%, Reference Karno, Golding, Sorenson and Burnam29 whereas a study of inductees into the Israeli Army revealed a point prevalence of 3.6% for OCD. Reference Zohar, Pauls, Ratzoni, Apter, Binder and King30 No figures exist for the UK military. Most recruits join in late adolescence when obsessional symptoms, although common, Reference Apter, Fallon, King, Ratzoni, Zohar and Binder31 may not be precursors of OCD. Reference Maina, Albert, Bogetto and Ravizza32 Those attendees of MAP who enlisted at age 16 or 17 were no more likely to have obsessive-compulsive symptoms than attendees who joined at a later age. Currently, there is a debate as to how to conceptualise and classify this spectrum of symptoms. Reference Abramowitz, Taylor and McKay33 Although it has long been accepted that obsessive symptoms may be triggered by traumatic events in childhood and adulthood, or exacerbated by a mental disorder, Reference Lochner, du Toit, Zungu-Dirwayi, Marais, van Kradenburg and Seedat34,Reference Brown, Campbell, Lahman, Grisham and Mancill35 there is increasing cognitive psychological interest in the direction of the relationship. Reference Watkins and Brown36-Reference van der Houwen, Stroebe, Schut, Stroebe and van den Bout39 It is well known that obsessional symptoms may be part of other mental disorders such as depression, but it became increasingly clear in this cohort that obsessional personality traits and accompanying symptoms were independent of the mental disorder and particularly prominent in those who had problems readjusting to civilian life. Rumination was of particular relevance to the clinical presentation in up to 30% of the MAP cohort and the rate of anankastic personality disorder was similar to a cohort of combat veterans with both PTSD and depression. Reference Dunn, Yanasak, Schillaci, Simotas, Rehm and Souchek40 The relationship between PTSD, obsessional personalities and symptoms in serving and ex-service personnel is complicated. Reference Bollinger, Riggs, Blake and Ruzek41,Reference O'Toole, Marshall, Schureck and Dobson42 In the MAP cohort, 16% of those with OCD had comorbid PTSD. Rumination needs to be distinguished from intrusive re-experiencing thoughts and when they coexist treatment can be difficult. Reference Riggs43 Guilt, shame and remembrance of dead comrades were common ruminative themes in MAP attendees.

Obsessionality and service

All those who have served understand how success in the military requires acculturation to a society which has clear supra-ordinate goals, where hard work, trust, mutual support, interdependency and integrity matter and attention to detail can be the difference between life and death for peers, superiors and subordinates. All military forces therefore require certain levels of obsessionality to achieve their mission. Practically, those with obsessional traits would appear to form a ‘good fit’ with the military structure and organisation that provides them with unambiguous and transparent structure, routine, job descriptions, roles, measures of success and paths to advancement. Obsessional traits are particularly welcomed in logistics, engineering, administration, bomb disposal, accountancy, information technology, military police, intelligence collation, etc. At this time, it is a moot point whether some individuals are attracted, by dint of temperament, to such a life. Obsessive cognitions may be ‘introceptive’, in that obsessional rituals sooth internal anxieties, or ‘extroceptive’, where the hierarchical construction of an organisation, in this case the military, sooths the individual who feels safe in it and who may be keen that others ‘conform’ to likewise benefit.

As found in this study, MAP attendees’ histories reveal that, years after leaving service, some individuals continued to ruminate over issues of guilt and/or shame at real or imagined sins of omission or commission and of not wanting to ‘let the side down’. Remembering was a key issue for many who seemed to be ‘unable to let go’ of events for fear of forgetting, as opposed to intrusively remembering. One can imagine how those with obsessional patterns of thinking are more likely to be troubled by the nature of some military tasks, the context in which such tasks were accomplished and, for some, the existential dimension of such tasks.

Obsessionality and readjustment to civilian life

Personal clinical experience over 30 years and MAP attendees’ histories reveal that those with obsessive-compulsive traits are often rapidly promoted to positions of increasing responsibility. For some this can lead to increasingly unmanageable stress with the resultant belief they have become ‘unfit for purpose’. Some individuals, rather than seeking help in service, choose to ‘do the right thing’ and leave service prematurely (premature voluntary redundancy). On leaving, although those with obsessive-compulsive symptoms may find a job with an introceptive component, they are unlikely to find the same extroceptive organisational structure even in the police, prison, fire service, civil services or the like.

Observers, mainly civilian, talk of ‘institutionalisation’, implying that the military imposes its values, mores and working practices on (presumably) passive individuals, ignoring the raft of interactive social psychological processes and benefits involved in enlistment and acculturation Reference Palmer44 as well as extensive help and advice available to every individual who runs into problems whether in service or after they have left. Although it is believed that the majority of ESP transit to civilian life without difficulty, every soldier who has acculturated to service will feel the ‘loss’ of family on leaving; those with obsessive-compulsive symptoms may perhaps feel this loss more keenly.

This unique study highlights the frequency of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the ESP population seeking help and the complicated relationship of obsessive-compulsive symptoms with post-service mental ill health. It would seem important to look for details of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in those who experience difficulty readjusting to civilian life, have problems engaging with services or fail to benefit from psychological interventions. Dyslexia, educational and literacy issues, particularly in soldiers, may add to the burden of readjustment and an individual's ability to benefit from written material given to all before discharge from the services.

Recommended treatments

The psychopathology of the MAP cohort was complicated and reflected the frequency of childhood adversity known to exist in this population. Reference Iversen, Fear, Simonoff, Hull, Horn and Greenberg45 Further NHS mental health service assessment and/or treatment was recommended in 86% of cases of which 57% were for CBT; 21% individuals required further medical assessment.

Criminal justice system

Of those who had been involved with the criminal justice system, 90% were in the army and of those 41% were infantry. Five individuals were assessed in prison and although there is no excess of violent crimes by ESP in prison, sexual offences are more common. 13 Additionally, 20% of the MAP cohort had self-harmed at some point.

Help-seeking

Despite the barriers, Reference Moller-Leimkuhler46-Reference Noone and Stephens48 serving personnel's help-seeking and treatment seem similar to the general population. Reference Iversen, van Staden, Hacker Hughes, Browne, Greenberg and Hotopf20 The average time from leaving service to MAP attendance was 12 years, similar to civilians. Reference Wang, Berglund, Olfson, Pincus, Wells and Kessler49 Engagement with service was hampered for some by real or imagined guilt or shame at acts of omission or commission and remembrance of dead comrades. The average age of MAP cohort was 45 years, which suggests accepting the need for help may improve with age. Reference Mackenzie, Gekoski and Knox50 All military medical records were available and 19% of the cohort had a record of in-service mental health involvement, 67% of whom had subsequent NHS follow-up.

Attribution

For hundreds of years British forces have undertaken war fighting and operations other than war. About 30% of the British army are combat arms (infantry, armour, artillery). Combat support arms work directly with combat troops, for example signallers, engineers and medics, and combat service support arms sustain them all. The threat differs with each type of operation, location, trade and the phase of the operation. Popular misconceptions about mental breakdown on war fighting operations exist. Reference Turner, Kiernan, McKechanie, Finch, McManus and Neal51 Only about a third of attendees were directly involved in combat and/or violent action. About 1 in 10 had never deployed operationally. Roughly half said they had witnessed death and 1 in 4 reported having witnessed the death or dead body of a comrade. Two of the cohort had mental health problems while on duty.

The MAP was extended to examine concerns that ESP's mental problems were consequent on military service. The assumption that military service is the major aetiological factor may be erroneous. Reference Boman52 Only 20% of diagnoses had an unambiguous link to military service, whereas 42% were unquestionably not attributable to service. The Howard League for Penal Reform Reference Iversen, van Staden, Hacker Hughes, Browne, Greenberg and Hotopf20 and the leading UK NGO for homeless ex-service personnel, Veterans Aid, consider that their clients’ situation is ‘hardly ever’ a direct consequence of their military service (H. Milroy, 2012, personal communication) and PTSD is uncommon in this population. Reference Johnsen, Jones and Rugg53

Stories of military imposters regularly turn up in the British media, Reference Gillan54 yet fabrication and exaggeration in the ex-service population is particularly difficult for those without military experience to identify. Although mental health professionals may seek to understand such behaviours, many in society, particularly military and ex-military personnel, see it as reprehensible, dishonourable and, at the very least, tarnishing the integrity of the ex-service community. This type of behaviour is not uncommon in the US veterans’ population, Reference Freuh, Elhai, Gold, Monnier, Magruder and Keane5,Reference Burkett and Whitley55-Reference Frueh, Grubaugh, Elhai and Buckley57 and it was found in 13% of the only British survey of ESP seeking treatment for combat-related PTSD. Reference Baggaley58 The figure for fabrication and/or exaggeration in MAP attendees is at least 10%. For example, being ‘unable to remember’ their service number (currently, army: other ranks 8 numbers, officers 6 numbers; Royal Navy: all ranks 6 numbers prefaced and ending with a letter; RAF: other ranks 8 numbers prefaced with a letter, officers 8 numbers ending with a letter) is most suspicious, particularly without organic brain damage or syndromes, as are vague and/or changing narratives. Some attendees said they ‘didn't want to’ or ‘couldn't’ talk as they had signed the Official Secrets Act, not in itself an impediment to therapeutic intervention. Some had been offered, yet not engaged with, evidence-based interventions, others had received evidence-based help which, unsurprisingly, had not helped them. Those of the MAP patients who fabricated their stories told of units or missions that did not exist, of tasks for which they could never have been trained (given their service history), of being ‘identified’ for ‘special duties’ or operations such as political assassinations, all narratives that are difficult for those without military experience to recognise as false.

Fabrication and exaggeration is commonplace in psychiatry but is seldom contemplated or discussed in consultations outside medico-legal, forensic, military and liaison practice. Reference Spence59 Although DSM-IV warns that ‘Malingering must be ruled out in those situations in which financial remuneration, benefit eligibility or forensic determinations play a role’ (p. 427), 60 it would be wrong to equate fabrication with malingering as such behaviours are multi-factorial in their genesis, from the fraudulent to the delusional. Examination of military and NHS records can be invaluable in identifying these behavioural patterns and corroboration of military service is recommended in the report into the UK Veterans’ Pilot Sites Study. Reference Dent-Brown, Ashworth, Barkham, Connell, Gilbody and Hardy17

Final comments

Ex-service personnel currently involved with NHS mental health services are likely to be middle-aged ex-soldiers (men). The overwhelming majority of those in contact with military or civilian criminal justice systems come from the army; however, the link between mental disorders and service is seldom straightforward. Although very few ESP will have psychotic illness, their needs are complicated, frequently falling short of entry criteria for many mental health teams yet outwith GPs/GP counsellor skills, which can reinforce ESP's stereotypes about civilian mental health services. Common psychiatric conditions occur in this group and the treatment is the same for civilians and ESP alike; it is not all PTSD, but alcohol misuse is high and, in a substantial number, obsessive-compulsive symptoms seem to be relevant to problems of readjustment to civilian life and could be screened for before leaving service.

Delay in seeking help is similar to that of civilians and barriers to care include male gender, pride, guilt, shame and remembrance of lost colleagues. Partners are frequently key in getting ESP to services. Those ESP who engage with services are as likely to do well as any other service user. Ex-service charities are helpful in pathways to care and offer many services unavailable to civilians. Understanding this population's needs is particularly important given their putative occupational antecedents and financial implications (for both the individual and the state). It is important to identify those individuals who are entitled to pensions and services so that scarce resources can be managed appropriately; corroboration of service is integral to this, aided further by service medical records.

Funding

The MAP is free to service users. I.P.'s post is funded by the UK Ministry of Defence. The paper is a funding requirement of the Ministry of Defence.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Edgar Jones and my colleagues in Hackney, London, for their support and their willing and most helpful advice: Robert Fisher, Kate Lockwood, Jide Morakinyo, Nick Price, Mark Salter and Trevor Turner.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

I.P. is employed by the Pensions, Compensation and Veterans Department of the UK Ministry of Defence. The Ministry had no input into the completion or presentation of this paper and sought no changes.

References

1 Barnett, C. Britain and Her Army: 1509–1970. Orion Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
2 Anderson, B. The British admire their Army – but they don't understand it. Independent 2009; 20 July.Google Scholar
3 Dandeker, C, Wessely, S, Iversen, A, Ross, J. What's in a name? Defining and caring for ‘veterans’. The UK in international perspective. Armed Forces Soc 2006; 32: 161–77.Google Scholar
4 Iversen, AC, Greenberg, N. Mental health of regular and reserve military veterans. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2009; 15: 100–6.Google Scholar
5 Freuh, BC, Elhai, JD, Gold, PB, Monnier, J, Magruder, KM, Keane, TM, et al. Disability compensation seeking army veterans evaluated for posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54: 8491.Google Scholar
6 Woodhead, C, Sloggett, A, Bray, I, Bradbury, J, McManus, S, Meltzer, H, et al. An estimate of the veteran population in England: based on data from the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Popul Trends 2009; 138: 50–4.Google Scholar
7 NHS Choices 2011. Veterans: Mental Health. NHS Choices (http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Militarymedicine/Pages/Veteransmentalhealth.aspx).Google Scholar
8 Brian, B. The Unquiet Western Front: Britain's Role in Literature and History. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
9 Macintyre, B. British soldiers victims of a mental conflict without end. The Times 2009; 28 March.Google Scholar
10 Herbert, I. British soldiers go AWOL because Army ignores mental health problems. Independent 2007; 26 March.Google Scholar
11 Midgley, N. Col Tim Collins: Afghanistan is a ‘fashionable New Labour war’. Telegraph 2011; 21 February.Google Scholar
12 Hotopf, M, Hull, L, Fear, NT, Browne, T, Horn, O, Iversen, AC, et al. The health of UK military personnel who deployed to the 2003 Iraq war: a cohort study. Lancet 2006; 367: 1731–41.Google Scholar
13 Defence Analytical Services and Advice. Estimating the Proportion of Prisoners in England and Wales who are Ex-Armed Forces – Further Analysis. DASA, 2010.Google Scholar
14 Iversen, A, Dyson, C, Smith, N, Greenberg, N, Walwyn, R, Unwin, C, et al. ‘Goodbye and good luck’: the mental health needs and treatment experiences of British ex-service personnel. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 480–6.Google Scholar
15 Iversen, A, Nikalous, V, Greenberg, N, Unwin, C, Hull, L, Hotopf, M, et al. What happens to British veterans when they leave the armed forces? Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 175–84.Google Scholar
16 HM Government. New Horizons: A Shared Vision for Mental Health. HM Government, 2009.Google Scholar
17 Dent-Brown, K, Ashworth, A, Barkham, M, Connell, J, Gilbody, S, Hardy, G, et al. An Evaluation of Six Community Mental Health Pilots for Veterans of the Armed Forces: A Case Study Series. University of Sheffield, 2010 (http://www.shef.ac.uk/cpsr/projects/comvets).Google Scholar
18 Murphy, FM. Gulf War syndrome. BMJ 1999; 318: 274–5.Google Scholar
19 Pankratz, L. The misadventures of wanderers and victims of trauma. In Malingering and Illness Deception (eds Halligan, PW, Bass, C, Oakley, DA). Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
20 Iversen, AC, van Staden, L, Hacker Hughes, J, Browne, T, Greenberg, N, Hotopf, M, et al. Help-seeking and receipt of treatment among UK service personnel. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197: 149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 The Howard League for Penal Reform. Leaving Forces Life: The Issue of Transition. The Howard League (http://www.howardleague.org/leaving-forces-life/).Google Scholar
22 Hoge, C, Lesikar, SE, Guevara, R, Lange, J, Brundage, JF, Engel, CC, et al. Mental disorders among US military personnel in the 1990s: association with high levels of health care utilization and early military attrition. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1576–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Lee, HA, Gabriel, R, Bolton, JPG, Bale, AJ, Jackson, M. Health status and clinical diagnoses of 3000 UK Gulf War veterans. J Royal Soc Med 2002; 95: 491–7.Google Scholar
24 Palmer, I. The emotion that dare not speak its name? Br Army Rev 2003; 132: 31–7.Google Scholar
25 Slater, E. The neurotic constitution: a statistical study of two thousand soldiers. J Neurol Psychiatry 1943; 6: 116.Google Scholar
26 Moes, GS, Lall, R, Johnson, WB. Personality characteristics of successful navy submarine personnel. Milit Med 1996; 161: 239–42.Google Scholar
27 Christen, BR, Moore, JL. A descriptive analysis of ‘not aeronautically adaptable’ dispositions in the U.S. Navy. Aviat Space Environ Med 1998; 69: 1071–5.Google Scholar
28 Fu-Rong, W, Ya-Lin, Z. Psychosomatic symptoms and coping style of military officers in space base. Chin Ment Health J 2006; 20: 392–3.Google Scholar
29 Karno, M, Golding, JM, Sorenson, SB, Burnam, MA. The epidemiology of obsessive–compulsive disorder in five US communities. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 1094–9.Google Scholar
30 Zohar, AH, Pauls, DL, Ratzoni, G, Apter, A, Binder, DM, King, R, et al. An epidemiological study of obsessive–compulsive disorder and related disorders in Israeli adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiatry 1992; 31: 1057–61.Google Scholar
31 Apter, A, Fallon, TJ, King, RA, Ratzoni, G, Zohar, AG, Binder, M, et al. Obsessive–compulsive characteristics: from symptoms to syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiatry 1996; 35: 907–12.Google Scholar
32 Maina, G, Albert, U, Bogetto, F, Ravizza, L. Obsessive–compulsive syndromes in older adolescents. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 100: 447–50.Google Scholar
33 Abramowitz, JS, Taylor, S, McKay, D. Obsessive–compulsive disorder. Lancet 2009; 374: 491–9.Google Scholar
34 Lochner, C, du Toit, PL, Zungu-Dirwayi, N, Marais, A, van Kradenburg, J, Seedat, S, et al. Childhood trauma in obsessive–compulsive disorder, trichotillomania, and controls. Depress Anxiety 2002; 15: 66–8.Google Scholar
35 Brown, TA, Campbell, LA, Lahman, CL, Grisham, JR, Mancill, RB. Current and lifetime comorbidity of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders in a large clinical sample. J Abnor Psychol 2001; 110: 585–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Watkins, E, Brown, RG. Rumination and executive function in depression: an experimental study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 400–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Robinson, MS, Alloy, LB. Negative cognitive styles and stress-reactive rumination interact to predict depression: a prospective study. Cognit Ther Res 2003; 27: 275–91.Google Scholar
38 Ehring, T, Frank, S, Ehlers, A. The role of rumination and reduced concreteness in the maintenance of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma. Cognit Ther Res 2008; 32: 488506.Google Scholar
39 van der Houwen, K, Stroebe, M, Schut, H, Stroebe, W, van den Bout, J. Mediating processes in bereavement: the role of rumination, threatening grief interpretations, and deliberate grief avoidance. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71: 1669–76.Google Scholar
40 Dunn, NJ, Yanasak, E, Schillaci, J, Simotas, S, Rehm, LP, Souchek, J, et al. Personality disorders in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. J Traum Stress 2004; 17: 7582.Google Scholar
41 Bollinger, AR, Riggs, DS, Blake, DD, Ruzek, JI. Prevalence of personality disorders among combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 2000; 13: 255–70.Google Scholar
42 O'Toole, BI, Marshall, RP, Schureck, RJ, Dobson, M. Posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbidity in Australian Vietnam veterans: risk factors, chronicity and combat. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998; 32: 3242.Google Scholar
43 Riggs, DS. Treatment of concurrent PTSD and OCD: a commentary on the case of Howard (Response paper). Cogn Behav Practice 2000; 7: 130–2.Google Scholar
44 Palmer, I. Soldiers, learning and fear. Br Army Rev 2004; 135: 64–7.Google Scholar
45 Iversen, AC, Fear, NT, Simonoff, E, Hull, L, Horn, O, Greenberg, N, et al. Influence of childhood adversity on health among male UK military personnel. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 506–11.Google Scholar
46 Moller-Leimkuhler, AM. Barriers to help-seeking by men: a review of sociocultural and clinical literature with particular reference to depression. J Affective Disord 2002; 71: 19.Google Scholar
47 Langston, V, Greenberg, N, Fear, N, Iversen, AC, French, C, Wessely, S. Stigma and mental health in the Royal Navy: a mixed methods paper. J Ment Health 2010; 19: 816.Google Scholar
48 Noone, JH, Stephens, C. Men, masculine identities, and health care utilisation. Soc Health Illness 2008; 30: 711–25.Google Scholar
49 Wang, PS, Berglund, P, Olfson, M, Pincus, HA, Wells, KB, Kessler, RC. Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 603–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50 Mackenzie, CS, Gekoski, WL, Knox, VN. Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: the influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging Ment Health 2006; 10: 574–82.Google Scholar
51 Turner, MA, Kiernan, MD, McKechanie, AG, Finch, PJC, McManus, FB, Neal, LA. Acute military psychiatric casualties from the war in Iraq. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 476–9.Google Scholar
52 Boman, B. Combat stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, and associated psychiatric disturbance. Psychosomatics 1986; 27: 567–73.Google Scholar
53 Johnsen, S, Jones, A, Rugg, J. The Experiences of Homeless Ex-Service Personnel in London. University of York Centre for Housing Policy, 2008 (http://www.parliament.uk/deposits/depositedpapers/2009/DEP2009-0254.pdf).Google Scholar
54 Gillan, A. The fantasy life and lonely death of the SAS veteran who never was. Guardian 2009; 24 January.Google Scholar
55 Burkett, BG, Whitley, G. Stolen Valor. Verity Press Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
56 Frueh, BC, Elhai, JD, Grubaugh, AL, Monnier, J, Kashdan, TB, Sauvageot, JA, et al. Documented combat exposure of US veterans seeking treatment for combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 467–72.Google Scholar
57 Frueh, BS, Grubaugh, AL, Elhai, JD, Buckley, TC. US Department of Veterans Affairs disability policies for posttraumatic stress disorder: administrative trends and implications for treatment, rehabilitation and research. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 2143–5.Google Scholar
58 Baggaley, M. ‘Military Munchausen's’: assessment of factitious claims of military service in psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Bull 1998; 22: 153–4.Google Scholar
59 Spence, SA. Reading about deception. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 146–9.Google Scholar
60 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Forth Edition (DSM-IV). APA, 1994.Google Scholar
Figure 0

TABLE 1 Sample characteristics

Figure 1

TABLE 2 Military characteristics of sample

Figure 2

TABLE 3 ICD-10 diagnoses

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.