Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:15:11.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community treatment orders: current practice with regard to the Human Rights Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Maung Oakarr
Affiliation:
Plymouth Community Healthcare, email: maung.oakarr@nhs.net
Bernadette Rheeder
Affiliation:
Cornwall Foundation Trust, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2013

We were struck by the potential legal implications surrounding the discretionary conditions of a community treatment order, in particular social conditions such as conditions on driving, restricted family visits and checking mail, which are authoritarian in their approach. Lepping & Malik rightly pointed out that these conditions raise ethical issues. Reference Lepping and Malik1

Article 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) sets out that persons detained unlawfully should be able to secure their release by petition to an independent court of law. The power of mental health review tribunals to order discharge from community treatment orders appears to meet this requirement. However, the tribunal does not have the power to vary the conditions of a community treatment order, and the patient does not have the right to appeal these. Reference Daw2 Severe restrictions which effectively amount to a deprivation of liberty would almost certainly be challengeable on human rights grounds with regard to a breach of Article 8 ‘Rights to a private and family life’. Reference Gostin, McHale, Fennell, MacKay and Bartlett3 In many countries where community treatment orders are used, the conditions are authorised by the judicial system as opposed to the UK where the responsible clinician instigates the conditions.

We would like to highlight that responsible clinicians should consider both Article 5 and 8 of the Human Rights Act when setting conditions for the community treatment order as in our opinion this remains a likely area for a potential judicial review.

References

1 Lepping, P, Malik, M. Community treatment orders: current practice and a framework to aid clinicians. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 54–7.Google Scholar
2 Daw, R. The Mental Health Act 2007 – The defeat of an ideal. J Ment Health L 2007; Nov: 131–48.Google Scholar
3 Gostin, L, McHale, J, Fennell, P, MacKay, RD, Bartlett, P (eds) Principles of Mental Health Law and Policy. Oxford University Press, 2010: 531.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.