Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:33:07.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seeing, spots and blots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Baljean Dhillon
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh/NHS Lothian; Edinburgh, UK, email: baljean.dhillon@ed.ac.uk
Neena Dhillon
Affiliation:
CT1 Psychiatry Trainee, NHS Fife, Fife, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Author

We were drawn to Nour & Nour's article on visual perception by the front cover illustration of the Herdmann grid, whose illusory qualities remain unexplained. Reference Nour and Nour1 Their focus is on visual perception and how machine learning might shed light on the neuroscience of seeing, using an example of a Google-grown artificial neural network to identify bananas in a banana-free image by manipulating prior expectations. Pareidolic illusions and seeing things that are not actually there are as relevant to understanding clinical disease as they are to aesthetics and there is increasing interest in trying to dissect the mechanisms underlying this intriguing and complex phenomenon.

The legacy of Rorschach and his eponymous images live on in recent research revealing that it might be the detailed fractal geometry at the patterned edge which underlies the subjective response. Reference Taylor, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Micolich and Boydston2 Building other features into Rorschach-like computer generated images, such as right-left symmetry patterns, seems to stimulate face pareidolia through top-down processing. Reference Liu, Li, Feng, Li, Tian and Lee3 The predictive potential of a ‘pareidolia test’ is as tantalising as ink blot patterns would have been to early researchers. We now have the tools and technologies to explore this realm of visual distortion and deception which Rorschach could only have dreamed of possessing.

Building algorithms informed by real-life data should allow machine learning and modelling to be refined and capable of revealing new insights into the rich range of the visual perception spectrum, from normal to abnormal. Advances in both image processing and computing, together with accessible crowd-sourced subjects, will prove to be a valuable public psychophysics network to explore other aspects of visual perception and pareidolia and may be the means to test the validity of recent reports that probing this aspect of perception might be used as an early diagnostic tool for dementia. Reference Sasai-Sakuma, Nishio, Yokoi, Mori and Inoue4

References

1 Nour, MM, Nour, JM. Perceptual distortions and deceptions: what computers can teach us. BJPsych Bull 2017; 41: 3740.Google Scholar
2 Taylor, RP, Martin, TP, Montgomery, RD, Smith, JH, Micolich, AP, Boydston, C, et al. Seeing shapes in seemingly random spatial patterns: fractal analysis of Rorschach inkblots. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0171289.Google Scholar
3 Liu, J, Li, J, Feng, L, Li, L, Tian, J, Lee, K. Seeing Jesus in toast: neural behavioral correlates of face pareidolia. Cortex 2014; 53: 6077.Google Scholar
4 Sasai-Sakuma, T, Nishio, Y, Yokoi, K, Mori, E, Inoue, Y. Pareidolias in REM sleep behavior disorder: a possible predictive marker of Lewy Body Diseases? Sleep 2017; 40: zsw045.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.