Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:09:59.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematic review into factors associated with the recruitment crisis in psychiatry in the UK: students', trainees' and consultants' views

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abid Choudry*
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust
Saeed Farooq
Affiliation:
Keele University South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Foundation Trust
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and method

To review the literature to examine the factors that may be affecting recruitment into psychiatry in the UK. We systematically searched four databases to identify studies from 1974 to 2016 and identified 27 papers that met the specified inclusion criteria.

Results

Most papers (n = 24) were based on questionnaire surveys. The population in all studies comprised of 1879 psychiatrists, 6733 students and 220746 trainees. About 4–7% of students opt for a career in psychiatry. Enrichment activities helped to attract students more towards psychiatry than just total time spent in the specialty. Job content in terms of the lack of scientific basis, poor prognosis and stigma towards psychiatry, work-related stress and problems with training jobs were common barriers highlighted among students and trainees, affecting recruitment. Job satisfaction and family-friendly status of psychiatry was rated highly by students, with lifestyle factors appearing to be important for trainees who tend to choose psychiatry.

Clinical implications

Negative attitudes and stigma towards psychiatry continue to persist. Teaching and training in psychiatry needs rethinking to improve student experience and recruitment into the specialty.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2017

Psychiatry as a career has been negatively regarded and unpopular among medical students. About 3.6% of British graduates decide on a career in psychiatry whereas about 6% are needed. 1 From 2000 to 2011, the absolute number of consultant psychiatrists in England rose from 2904 to 4394 (an increase of 51%), with similar increases in Scotland and Wales, in line with the expansion of the consultant workforce in most secondary care specialties. 1 A need for more psychiatric consultant posts has been predicted based on projections of increasing workloads due to the increased population needs. 2 A perceived fall in the proportion of UK medical school graduates choosing a postgraduate career in psychiatry, and low competition ratios for first-year core specialist training (CT1) posts in psychiatry, 35 has led to many questions about the way in which psychiatry is taught at medical school and how psychiatry could be made as an attractive career option. Reference Brown and Eagles68

Low recruitment in psychiatry is a global issue, highlighted in a number of publications. Reference Brockington and Mumford9,Reference Barkil-Oteo10 However, the problem also has country-specific dimensions, as each country has different factors such as the pay scale for the specialty, medical education system and training programmes, which may attract or dissuade medical students from a career in psychiatry. The subject has not been reviewed systematically especially in the context of recruitment in the UK. The review question was: what are the factors that influence recruitment to psychiatry as a career choice and how can this be improved? The aim of this paper is to systematically review the literature from the UK on psychiatry as a career choice. We are specifically interested in identifying the factors that influence the recruitment into psychiatry with emphasis on barriers and facilitators affecting recruitment. A greater understanding of the views ranging from medical students to trainees and consultants working in the UK may enable curriculum developers and recruitment leads to design programmes that attract students and trainees to psychiatry as a career and improve students' attitudes towards psychiatry in the long term.

Method

We followed the PRISMA statement Reference Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff and Altman11 as a guide for conducting the systematic review. The following electronic databases were searched from 1974 onwards: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO. These databases were selected in view of the fact that almost all the literature published from the UK would be covered in these databases. Keywords used in the searches included: medical students, trainees, doctors, consultant, attitudes, psychiatry, career, undergraduate psychiatry. Boolean operations and truncations were added to allow for alternative endings in the keyword searches. The search was last updated in August 2016.

We included studies that described a UK sample, were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal and provided original data on careers in psychiatry or factors affecting recruitment in psychiatry. We excluded studies that had the primary objective of addressing other issues that were not directly relevant to recruitment in psychiatry but only mentioned their effects on career choice as a secondary effect. Studies which provided data on medical careers in general were included if these provided data relevant to psychiatric careers or recruitment.

The electronic search returned 601 relevant abstracts and titles. We screened the titles and abstracts and excluded the studies that were not directly relevant to the objectives of the review. Therefore we excluded the studies that did not describe a UK sample or did not provide the original data. We also excluded the studies that described the recruitment to certain subspecialties and therefore not relevant to the recruitment to psychiatry in general. After screening these titles and abstracts we decided to examine 56 full text papers. Finally, we included 27 papers in the review. Further details are provided in Fig. 1. The studies were conducted in a number of different populations, settings and periods, and also used diverse methodologies varying from surveys to statistics derived from databases. The 30-item Attitudes Towards Psychiatry (ATP-30), Reference Burra, Kalin, Leichner, Waldron, Handforth and Jarrett12 a validated tool used to assess attitudes of students towards psychiatry, was used in four papers; other papers used different questionnaires to assess attitudes. Due to the diverse methodologies it was inappropriate to pool the data to produce a statistical summary. We therefore describe the main findings and produce a narrative summary of results.

Fig. 1 Summary of the abstracts reviewed to identify relevant papers. CAMHS, child and adolescent mental health services.

Results

Characteristics of included studies

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 27 studies included in the review. The majority of studies (n = 24) were surveys and questionnaire-based studies. The other studies included one database study of doctors entering training posts and two retrospective cohort studies, which looked at which medical school psychiatrists had attended. These reported on medical students (n = 12), trainees (n = 10), medical students and trainees (n = 1), trainees and consultants (n = 1) and consultants (n = 3). One of these studies looked at data from postgraduate departments in different medical schools, and one study reported on the database of applicants to MMC (Modernising Medical Careers) for training posts.

Table 1 Study characteristics

Author/year Population Method/design Total
sample, n
M:F ratio, %/
response rate, %
Brook, 1976 Reference Brook19 Medical school of origin
for psychiatrists
Retrospective cohort 531 No data provided
Brook, 1983 Reference Brook21 Medical school of origin
for psychiatrists
Retrospective cohort 1229 No data provided
Levine et al, 1983 Reference Levine, Barzansky, Blumberg and Flaherty24 Medical students Survey 30 No M:F data/100
Brook et al, 1986 Reference Brook, Ingleby and Wakeford20 Medical students Survey 498 64:36/40
Calvert et al, 1999 Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33 Medical students Survey 392 M:F, no significant
difference/70
Mcparland et al, 2003 Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30 Medical students Cohort study – survey 379 54:46/84
Maidment et al, 2003 Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, McParland and Noble31 Medical students Survey 837 33.6:66.4/99.6
Petrides & McManus,
2004 Reference Petrides and McManus23
Medical students Cohort study – survey 8283 Only descriptive data
provided in this paper
Rajagopal et al, 2004 Reference Rajagopal, Rehill and Godfrey35 Medical students Survey 301 31.9:68.1/52
Curtis-Barton & Eagles, 2011 Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25 Medical students Survey 467 44:64/51
Budd et al, 2011 Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26 Medical students at 4
different medical schools
Survey 905 36:64/Not provided
clearly reported range
50–85% depending on
medical school
Archdall et al, 2013 Reference Archdall, Atapattu and Anderson34 Medical students Survey 15 30:70/100
Halder et al, 2013 Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28 Medical students –
18 UK medical schools
Survey 484 34:66/None
Farooq et al, 2014 Reference Farooq, Lydall, Malik, Ndetei and Bhugra27 Medical students
(only UK data used)
Survey 291 Males 37:63/16
Maidment et al, 2004 Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, McParland and Noble31 Trainee doctors Survey 234 52.1:47.9/67.4
Goldacre et al, 2005 Reference Goldacre, Turner, Fazel and Lambert14 Trainee doctors
(graduates from 1974 to
2000, UK medical schools)
Survey 21 845 year 1
17 741 year 3
Year 1 55:45/75
Year 3 56:44/74
Lambert et al, 2006 Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15 Trainee doctors Survey 572 No M:F data/74
Fazel et al, 2009 Reference Fazel and Ebmeier13 Trainee doctors
(all applicants to MMC for
training posts)
Database analysis 31 434 No M:F data
Barras & Harris, 2012 Reference Barras and Harris38 Trainee doctors Survey 359 52.2:47.8/16.1
Goldacre et al, 2012 Reference Goldacre, Goldacre and Lambert16 Trainee doctors who had
qualified in 2002, 2005,
2008
Survey 9155 37:63/56
Goldacre et al, 2013 Reference Goldacre, Fazel, Smith and Lambert17 Trainee doctors who
qualified between 1974
and 2009
Survey 33 974 Year 1 49:51/65.9
Year 3 51:49/68.6
Year 5 52:48/69.5
Svirko et al, 2013 Reference Svirko, Goldacre and Lambert18 Trainee doctors who qualified
2005, 2008, 2009
Survey 9348 46.9:55.8/52.2
Collier & Moreton, 2013 Reference Collier and Moreton22 Hospital postgraduate
departments of 19 medical
schools
Survey 19 medical
schools
No M:F data/70
Woolf et al, 2015 Reference Woolf, Elton and Newport37 Medical students and
trainee doctors
Cohort study – survey 105 34:66/50
Korszun et al, 2011 Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36 Trainee doctors, academics,
trust clinicians
Survey 309 61.5:38.5/None
Dein et al, 2007 Reference Dein, Livingston and Bench39 Consultants Survey 72 68:32/82.7
Denman et al, 2016 Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32 Consultants and trainees Survey Consultants: 47
Trainees: 51
55:45/41.7
(consultants 42%,
trainees 41%)

M, male; F, female; MMC, Modernising Medical Careers.

a. Data not used from this paper just broad findings in review.

In survey-based studies response rates varied from 16% to 100%. Mean response rate from the papers which had figures available (n = 20) was 63.3%. The population in all studies comprised of 1879 psychiatrists, 6733 students and 220 746 trainees. One database study Reference Fazel and Ebmeier13 looked at 31 434 trainee doctors, and studies by Goldacre et al were aimed at all doctors in training, accounting for large numbers of respondents in the trainee subcategory. Reference Goldacre, Turner, Fazel and Lambert14Reference Svirko, Goldacre and Lambert18

The influence of the medical school and teaching practices

Most of the research addressing the influence of the medical school and teaching practices on selecting psychiatry as a career was carried out in the 1970's and 1980's. Two studies by Brook et al Reference Brook19,Reference Brook, Ingleby and Wakeford20 looked at the medical school of origin for 531 psychiatrists between 1961 and 1970 and reported no significant relationship between schools that had a professional unit or specific teaching programme and students pursuing psychiatry in the long term. However, it was noted that those schools that produced fewer psychiatrists tended to have either a recently established professional unit or none. Reference Brook19

No clear pattern emerged in terms of the type of teaching offered at each university and the impact this had on choice of psychiatry as a career in the long term. Reference Brook19 All four Scottish schools, and Cambridge and Oxford were noted to be higher in terms of producing psychiatrists, attributed possibly to the well-established professional units such as the Maudsley and Bethlem Royal hospitals. Reference Brook19 The personality, charisma and enthusiasm of teachers were associated with an increase in the uptake of psychiatry in the long term. Reference Brook19,Reference Brook21

Brook et al Reference Brook21 found that the effectiveness of teaching rather that the amount of teaching had an effect on student attitudes and recruitment into psychiatry The attitude of non-psychiatric teachers appeared to be influential with doctors experiencing negative attitudes of other doctors towards psychiatry. Reference Brook21 The two hospitals which ranked top in terms of producing psychiatrists had changed their teaching model. One stressed the importance of psychiatry as being part of general medicine, emphasising the effectiveness of physical therapy, whereas the other placed emphasis on liaison psychiatry and psychotherapy. Reference Brook21

More recent work by Collier et al Reference Collier and Moreton22 looked into the teaching time allocated for psychiatry in foundation programmes across the country. They found that only 2.3% of teaching was dedicated to psychiatry compared with 44.1% to medical and surgical topics. Reference Collier and Moreton22 Exposure to psychiatry remained limited with 4 out of 17 hospitals in the survey not having any teaching on psychiatry for medical students. Reference Collier and Moreton22 Doctors generally led a higher proportion of medicine and surgery teaching sessions (63%) compared with psychiatry (48%). Reference Collier and Moreton22

Medical students' views of psychiatry and factors affecting career choice

Twelve studies examined the factors affecting medical students' career choice and one study looked at both medical students and trainees. Petrides et al Reference Petrides and McManus23 studied the theoretical understanding of how different medical specialties are perceived and how choices are made. Psychiatrists were found to have a more artistic approach to medicine, seeing interpreting and responding imaginatively to a range of medical, social, ethical and other problems. This is in keeping with early work by Levine et al Reference Levine, Barzansky, Blumberg and Flaherty24 who also found that there was a group of students who were ‘psychologically minded’ and they could be identified and encouraged to make psychiatry as career choice.

Budd et al Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26 found that job satisfaction (98%, n = 128) and family-friendly status of psychiatry (79%, n = 103) were important for students who rated psychiatry as one of their top three choices. Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26 The academic status was significantly less important (48%) for students who placed psychiatry as their top three specialty schools v. 63% for those who did not place psychiatry in their top three choice. Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26

Choice of psychiatry as a career among medical and sixth form students

The number of students choosing psychiatry has remained fairly stable at around 4–7%. Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25Reference Farooq, Lydall, Malik, Ndetei and Bhugra27 Three per cent of students from six medical schools placed psychiatry as their first choice, with 18% seriously considering it. Reference Brook, Ingleby and Wakeford20 Halder et al Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28 found similar results in 18 medical schools; 16% chose psychiatry as a future career on entering medical school but by the final year only 3% had decided to pursue a career in the subject. These results were replicated by Farooq et al Reference Farooq, Lydall, Malik, Ndetei and Bhugra27 In a survey of sixth form students, Maidment et al Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, Whitaker and Katona29 reported that 60.9% (n = 363) indicated that it would be very likely or they would definitely want to pursue psychiatry as a career. In terms of overall intentions to pursue a career in a specialty, the ratings for psychiatry was similar to general medicine at 12.4% (n = 72) v. 12.2% (n = 69) respectively. Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, Whitaker and Katona29

Effect of undergraduate attachment and education on choosing psychiatry as a career

Positive attitudes towards psychiatry and the influence by a teacher during the attachment correlated with an intention to purse psychiatry as a career in the long term. Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, Whitaker and Katona29Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, McParland and Noble31 Three studies highlighted the importance of psychiatric attachment. Student attitudes improved as the attachment progressed. Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26,Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30,Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, McParland and Noble31 Maidment et al Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, Whitaker and Katona29 found 1.4% of fourth-year medical students expressed a definite intention to pursue which rose to 4.7% after their attachment. Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, Whitaker and Katona29 McParland et al Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30 reported that 19% (n = 58/309) of students were very attracted to psychiatry or had a definite intention to pursue psychiatry at the start of the placement, which increased to 27% (n = 101/373) of students at the end of the attachment. The importance of the undergraduate experience was highlighted by a recent study showing 50% of consultants and 37% of trainees surveyed decided on a career in psychiatry while still at medical school. Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32

Calvert et al Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33 looked into the attitudes of medical students towards psychiatry and psychiatric patients at year 1, 3 and 5 in medical school. First-year medical students were more likely to have stereotypical views compared with third- and fifth-year students, and were more likely to agree with statements such as ‘Psychiatry deals with imaginary illness’ (mean 1.4, s.d. = 0.9, P < 0.5). Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33 Fifth-year students (mean 3.2, s.d. = 1.4) showed lower agreement than third-year medical students (mean 3.6, s.d. = 1.2, P < 0.5) with the statement ‘Psychiatry is as a challenging career’. Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33 As they progressed through medical school, students recognised that mental illness has serious morbidity and that people do recover from mental illness, Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33 showing that attitudes towards psychiatric patients improved with greater clinical experience but possibly became more negative towards psychiatry as a career.

Other factors that appeared to affect students positively included enrichment activities, i.e. activities beyond standard teaching and clinical placements led to a significantly increased interest in psychiatry. Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28 These included research experience in psychiatry (13% v. 4% in those not interested in psychiatry, P = 0.001), university psychiatry clubs (38% v. 11%, P < 0.001), psychiatry electives (14% v. 1%, P < 0.001) and psychiatry special study modules (38% v. 16%, P < 0.001). Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28

McParland et al Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30 identified factors which increased interest in psychiatry, including: influence or encouragement by someone during the attachment (74%, n = 282), particularly the influence by consultants (43%, n = 163), exposure to interesting and stimulating ideas (29%, n = 110), liking someone's approach (27%, n = 103), feeling someone believed in their ability (11%, n = 41) and having formed close working relationships (9%, n = 33). Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30 Other factors that had a significant impact were: receiving encouragement from the consultants (n = 374, P < 0.001, r = 0.26), seeing patients respond to treatment (n = 374, P < 0.001, r = 0.20) and having a direct role in the involvement of patient care (n = 374, P < 0.001, r = 0.26). Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30

Factors which did not affect career choice of medical students

Seeing patients in different settings or different phases of the illness had no effect on career choice of medical students when deciding their career intentions. Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28 Interestingly, one study found that the earning potential and status of psychiatry had no effect on selecting psychiatry as a career choice. Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26 Other factors related to teaching such as quality of rating of small group teaching and lectures, Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28 the curriculum type used Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30,Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, McParland and Noble31 and performance at viva examinations and multiple choice questions also had no effect on the career choice. Reference Maidment, Livingston, Katona, McParland and Noble31

Factors discouraging medical students to choose psychiatry as a career

Curtis-Barton et al Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25 in their survey (n = 467) found that the factors discouraging students to pursue a career in psychiatry included: prognosis of patients (62%), perception that there is a lack of evidence in diagnosis (51%), lack of scientific basis (53%) and the amount of bureaucracy and paperwork in the specialty (48%). Other discouraging factors included the stigma towards psychiatry (30%), the standing of the profession among medical colleagues (31%) and comments by other specialists (26%). Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25,Reference Archdall, Atapattu and Anderson34 Psychiatry scored the lowest among the specialties as a career choice. Students described psychiatry as boring, unscientific, depressing, stressful, frustrating and ‘not enjoying the rotation’. Reference Rajagopal, Rehill and Godfrey35

Many students experienced psychiatry as being different to other specialties. For some this was a reason not to pursue psychiatry as a career but for others it was a positive aspect of the specialty Students felt ward rounds focused on ‘social issues’ rather than medical conditions. Some found it an ‘emotional burden’ and others felt that psychiatry could not ‘fix’ people and no one is being cured. Reference Archdall, Atapattu and Anderson34

A survey by Korszun et al Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36 examined the views of trainee, academics and clinicians on students not taking up psychiatry. The following factors were identified as deterring the students from psychiatry: negative attitudes towards psychiatrists from other doctors and health professionals (57%), stigmatisation of psychiatry (40%), stigma associated with mental health disorders (39%), poor teaching and role modelling from psychiatrists (37%), psychiatry not seen as medical or scientific enough (26%) and poor morale among psychiatrists (26%). Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36

Factors affecting trainees' and consultants' choice of psychiatry

Fazel et al Reference Fazel and Ebmeier13 found that psychiatry was the sixth most popular specialty out of ten specialty groups for trainees applying for training places. A higher proportion of female graduates were shown to choose psychiatry between 1974 (32%) and 1999 (59%). Reference Fazel and Ebmeier13 However, a more recent survey showed a slight decline in the number of women choosing psychiatry over the last decade, 4.9% (1999) v. 4.6 % (2009). Reference Goldacre, Fazel, Smith and Lambert17

Goldacre et al Reference Goldacre, Turner, Fazel and Lambert14 examined career choices for medical students over the past 40 years. The number of doctors choosing psychiatry as a career has hardly changed and remains around 4–5%, which is similar to figures from 1975. Reference Goldacre, Turner, Fazel and Lambert14 It was noted that students who went on to work in psychiatry 10 years after graduation, 52% (224 out of 428) had chosen psychiatry in the first year after graduation and 71% (308 out of 434) had chosen it in year 3. Reference Goldacre, Turner, Fazel and Lambert14

In common with the factors attracting students towards psychiatry, numerous studies identified factors that appear to attract trainees towards psychiatry The major attractions for choosing psychiatry are listed in Box 1. Denman et al Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32 found that the most common factor influencing core trainees' (60%) and consultants' (70%) decisions to specialise in psychiatry was emphasis on the patient as a whole. Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32 Trainees highlighted that mental health was an area of need (53%) and empathy and concerns for people with mental illness (53%) were important reasons for choosing psychiatry. Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32

Box 1 Factors attracting medical students and trainees in pursuing psychiatry as a career

Barriers associated with not choosing psychiatry as a long-term career choice for trainees

Barras & Harris Reference Barras and Harris38 explored trainee's experiences (n = 359) within psychiatry. Trainee attitudes were grouped into different categories. The attitudes towards psychiatry (12.6%), professional role (12%) and day-to-day working (11.3%) were identified as the main negative factors. Trainees raised concerns with the training programmes in psychiatry, such as problems with the rota and not having enough time with patients. Reference Barras and Harris38 Many trainees felt frustrated with the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) process and workplace-based assessments, as well as the duplication of paperwork being a constant frustration. Reference Barras and Harris38

The studies identified a number of barriers against choosing psychiatry as a career (Box 2).

Trainees felt improvements were needed in terms of training opportunities and felt this could be enhanced by providing a variety of jobs, increasing research opportunities and increasing medical aspects of training. Reference Barras and Harris38

Work looking into consultant psychiatrists' views into why they chose psychiatry was limited to two papers. Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32,Reference Dein, Livingston and Bench39 Dein et al Reference Dein, Livingston and Bench39 found that the majority of consultants (46%) chose psychiatry as a career soon after leaving medical school, and a recent study surveying consultants in the West Midlands found that 50% had made their choice by graduation from medical school. Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32 The main reasons cited by consultants for choosing psychiatry as a career included: empathy for those with a mental disorder (36.1%), interface with neuroscience (25%), expectation of better working conditions in psychiatry (20%) and influence of teaching at medical school (19.4%). Reference Dein, Livingston and Bench39 Denman et al Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32 highlighted several ‘very important’ reasons for consultants choosing psychiatry including: career in psychiatry would be intellectually challenging (60%), sense of fulfilment expected from seeing patients improve (47%) and enjoyment of problem-solving (47%). Lifestyle factors such as salary, better working conditions and quality of life were shown to be more important reasons for choosing psychiatry for trainees compared with consultants. Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32

Box 2 Barriers associated with not choosing psychiatry as a career

  1. Job content (71.7%) (n = 71) (including the lack of scientific basis, job not being clinical, poor prognosis) Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15,Reference Goldacre, Fazel, Smith and Lambert17,Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25,Reference Rajagopal, Rehill and Godfrey35,Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36,Reference Barras and Harris38

  2. Poor public image of psychiatry Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15,Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25,Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36

  3. Lack of respect towards psychiatry as a specialty by other specialties Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15,Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25,Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36

  4. Work-related stress cited by (49%) Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15 trainees in psychiatry Reference Barras and Harris38

  5. 25–50% of trainees leaving psychiatry as a specialty cited lack of resources as one of the main reasons which was significantly more than those rejecting general practice and trauma and orthopaedics Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15,Reference Barras and Harris38

  6. 25–50% of trainees leaving psychiatry Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15,Reference Goldacre, Goldacre and Lambert16,Reference Barras and Harris38 highlighted:

    1. a. lack of adequately supervised training

    2. b. lack of evidence base to diagnosis and treatment

    3. c. lack of improvement in patients

    4. d. work-life balance

    5. e. work not clinical enough

  7. Physical risks involved in the job Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15

  8. Sense of eroded professionalism Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36,Reference Barras and Harris38

  9. Too much paperwork and duplication Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25,Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36,Reference Barras and Harris38

  10. Problems with rota and not enough time with patients Reference Barras and Harris38

  11. Trainees leaving the scheme felt frustrated with workplace-based assessments Reference Barras and Harris38

  12. Low morale among workforce Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33

  13. Future role of psychiatrists being eroded Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33

Discussion

This is the first systematic review of literature which examined factors that influence the choice of psychiatry as a career in the UK. The main findings are that enrichment activities help to attract students more towards psychiatry than just total time spent in the specialty. Job satisfaction and family-friendly status of psychiatry was rated highly by students who tend to choose psychiatry. Role models and encouragement from consultants may increase the number of students who want to pursue psychiatry as a career. The major factors that appeared to dissuade medical students/trainees from pursuing psychiatry as a career included: an apparent lack of scientific basis of psychiatry and work not being clinical enough, perception that psychiatry is more concerned about social issues, the bureaucracy, paperwork, apparent poor prognosis of patients, stigma towards psychiatry as a specialty, low morale, and onerous workloads as a consultant.

We are aware of one previous systematic review that examined medical students' attitudes towards psychiatry internationally. Reference Lyons40 In common with our study this systematic review alongside another survey of psychiatrists Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36 highlighted the stigma towards mental illness as a major barrier influencing negative medical views towards psychiatry. Reference Lyons40 Stigma towards psychiatry as a specialty arises from a variety of sources, notably from medical students themselves. In addition, this stigma could arise from ward staff attitudes towards patients and from other doctors in other specialties, which detract students. Reference Fazel and Ebmeier13,Reference Curtis-Barton and Eagles25,Reference Archdall, Atapattu and Anderson34

Other reviews have looked at one aspect such as the effect of clinical experience of psychiatry on medical students' attitudes towards the specialty. Reference Qureshi, Carney and Iversen41 Lyons Reference Lyons40 highlighted the impact of poor-quality teaching leading to negative attitudes towards psychiatry and highlighted the need to address psychiatry curricula and introduce novel teaching strategies. Reference Lyons40 El-Sayeh et al Reference El-Sayeh, Budd, Waller and Holmes42 have previously highlighted the importance of teaching and the various methods which could be utilised to try to improve the student experience and in turn help attract students towards psychiatry. The recent survey by Korszun et al Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36 highlighted that the number of clinicians compared with academics and trainees agreed that they did not have time to teach medical students (P < 0.001). Both clinicians (42%) and academics (47%) felt that teaching medical students did not contribute to their future career prospects compared with 21% of trainees (P < 0.001) Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36 Fewer clinicians considered teaching to be a significant component of their appraisal compared with trainees and academics. Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36 The combination of poor teaching practices due to lack of resources or commitment and the stigma reinforce the poor image of psychiatry.

We feel that the findings of our study support the recommendations made by Mukherjee et al Reference Mukherjee, Maier and Wessely43 which identify a number of steps to address the crisis in psychiatry recruitment at different nodal points in a medical career, i.e. prior to entry to medical school, during medical education and after graduation.

Improving recruitment

This study highlights the need to change the experience of psychiatry at undergraduate and postgraduate level in keeping with work by Shah et al Reference Shah, Brown, Eagles, Brown and Eagles44 who highlighted early medical experience, influence of seniors and the aspects related to working environment as areas that could be affected positively which in turn could have a positive effect on choosing psychiatry as a career. Kelley et al Reference Kelley, Brown and Carney45 highlighted the impact of foundation programme experience in psychiatry, with a significantly higher proportion of trainees pursuing a career in psychiatry compared with those without any exposure to psychiatry (14.9% v. 1.8%). This correlates with earlier findings by Shah et al Reference Shah, Brown, Eagles, Brown and Eagles44 that found a significant correlation between those Scottish students considering psychiatry as a career and having held a psychiatry post. Reference Mukherjee, Maier and Wessely43 A recent survey by Denman et al Reference Denman, Oyebode and Greening32 showed that 43% of psychiatry trainees made their decision to specialise in psychiatry during the foundation years, correlating with increased exposure to psychiatry during the foundation years with 80% of trainees in this survey completing a post in psychiatry during the foundation years. Specific enrichment activities beyond standard teaching and clinical placements such as research experience in psychiatry, university psychiatry clubs, summer schools, Reference Greening, Tarn and Purkis46 psychiatry electives and psychiatry special study modules appear to be a way in which medical students will gain invaluable experiences and improve their attitudes to psychiatry. These need to be adopted and evaluated in future programmes to enhance recruitment in psychiatry Collier et al Reference Collier and Moreton22 found that only 2.3% of teaching was dedicated to psychiatry compared with 44.1% to medical and surgical topics, which does not help the poor image of psychiatry. This and similar issues need to be addressed at institutional level.

A number of studies found that psychiatry has a perception that it is not a ‘scientific’ or ‘medical’ discipline. Reference Lambert, Turner, Fazel and Goldacre15,Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36,Reference Barras and Harris38 Medical students and trainees expressed the views about the weakened medical identity of psychiatry. The erosion of the role of the psychiatrist was cited by some psychiatry trainees as a potential factor that would make them consider leaving psychiatry training. Reference Barras and Harris38 This unfortunately is not helped by negative comments or ‘bad-mouthing’ of psychiatry. Reference Korszun, Dharmaindra, Koravangattu and Bhui36,Reference Ajaz, David, Brown, Smuk and Korszun47

Interventions such as anti-stigma films and Medfest Reference Ahmed, Bennett, Haider and Byrne48 have been shown to improve medical students' attitudes to psychiatrists, serious mental illness and psychiatry, at least in the short term. Reference Ahmed, Bennett, Haider and Byrne48,Reference Kerby, Calton, Dimambro, Flood and Glazebrook49 However, it appears that there is need to reconsider the content of psychiatric training and the undergraduate curriculum. It has been suggested that moving undergraduate teaching from in-patient to general hospital settings such as liaison psychiatry will allow students to see patients with problems that are relevant to medical practice. Reference Ajaz, David, Brown, Smuk and Korszun47 Setting up and evaluating such programmes that have the potential to offer a different and enjoyable experience for medical students and foundation doctors should be a priority to improve the image of and recruitment into psychiatry.

Limitations

A limitation of the study is that almost all data are based on surveys and databases. This represents a cross-sectional view on the subject. The lack of any comparisons with other specialties, which may have similar recruitment rates, is particularly concerning. The focus on UK studies is also a limitation but was necessary to understand the factors affecting recruitment in this country We noted with some concern that there are only a few studies that address the positive aspects of psychiatry, Reference Budd, Kelley, Day, Variend and Dogra26Reference Haider, Hadjidemetriou, Pearson, Farooq, Lydall and Malik28,Reference McParland, Noble, Livingston and McManus30Reference Calvert, Sharpe, Power and Lawrie33 which may attract students and trainees towards psychiatry, and how these can be used for improving the recruitment. Future studies need to address this gap in the literature. Finally, we feel that the problems underlying the recruitment in psychiatry perhaps also reflect the lack of parity of esteem. Unless mental health is valued equally with physical health, the misconceptions and distorted perceptions about psychiatry as a discipline in which a medical career can be fruitfully pursued will linger on and will hinder aspiring physicians from considering psychiatry as a career option.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None.

References

1 Centre for Workforce Intelligence. In-depth Review of the Psychiatrist Workforce: Main Report. CFWI, 2014.Google Scholar
2 Centre for Workforce Intelligence. Shape of the Medical Workforce: Informing Medical Training Numbers. Centre for Workforce Intelligence, 2011.Google Scholar
3 Royal College of Psychiatrists. Census 2009: Workforce Figures for Psychiatrists. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010.Google Scholar
4 Carr, A, Sullivan, E, Buggle, S, Hamilton, P. Specialty training at ST1 and CT1 in England. BMJ Careers 2011; 30 Nov. Available at: http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/view-article.html?id=20005662 (accessed 27 June 2017).Google Scholar
5 Royal College of Psychiatrists. Fill Rate and Competition Ratios for CT1 August 2012 Intake. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2012 (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/trainpsychiatry/nationalrecruitment/fillratesandcompetition.aspx).Google Scholar
6 Brown, T, Eagles, J. Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates. RCPsych Publications, 2011.Google Scholar
7 Gask, L, Coskun, B, Baron, D. Teaching Psychiatry: Putting Theory into Practice. Wiley, 2011.Google Scholar
8 Royal College of Psychiatrists. Recruitment Strategy 2011–2016. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2012.Google Scholar
9 Brockington, IF, Mumford, DB. Recruitment into psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180: 307–12.Google Scholar
10 Barkil-Oteo, A. Psychiatry's identity crisis. Lancet 2012; 379: 2428.Google Scholar
11 Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–9.Google Scholar
12 Burra, P, Kalin, R, Leichner, PW, Waldron, JJ, Handforth, JR, Jarrett, FJ, et al. The ATP 30 – a scale for measuring medical students' attitudes to psychiatry. Med Educ 1982; 16: 31–8.Google Scholar
13 Fazel, S, Ebmeier, KP. Specialty choice in UK junior doctors: is psychiatry the least popular specialty for UK and international medical graduates? BMC Med Educ 2009; 9: 77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Goldacre, MJ, Turner, G, Fazel, S, Lambert, T. Career choices for psychiatry: national surveys of graduates of 1974–2000 from UK medical schools. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 158–64.Google Scholar
15 Lambert, TW, Turner, G, Fazel, S, Goldacre, MJ. Reasons why some UK medical graduates who initially choose psychiatry do not pursue it as a long-term career. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 679–84.Google Scholar
16 Goldacre, MJ, Goldacre, R, Lambert, TW. Doctors who considered but did not pursue specific clinical specialties as careers: questionnaire surveys. J R Soc Med 2012; 105: 166–76.Google Scholar
17 Goldacre, MJ, Fazel, S, Smith, F, Lambert, T. Choice and rejection of psychiatry as a career: surveys of UK medical graduates from 1974 to 2009. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 228–34.Google Scholar
18 Svirko, E, Goldacre, MJ, Lambert, T. Career choices of the United Kingdom medical graduates of 2005, 2008 and 2009: questionnaire surveys. Med Teach 2013; 35: 365–75.Google Scholar
19 Brook, PE. Where do psychiatrists come from? The influence of United Kingdom medical schools on the choice of psychiatry as a career. Br J Psychiatry 1976; 128: 313–7.Google Scholar
20 Brook, P, Ingleby, D, Wakeford, RE. Students' attitudes to psychiatry: a study of first-and final-year clinical students' attitudes in six medical schools. J Psychiatr Educ 1986; 3: 151–69.Google Scholar
21 Brook, P. Who's for psychiatry? United Kingdom medical schools and career choice of psychiatry 1961–75. Br J Psychiatry 1983; 142: 361–5.Google Scholar
22 Collier, A, Moreton, A. Does access to role models influence future career choice? Impact of psychiatry teaching on recently graduated doctors in the United Kingdom. Acad Psychiatry 2013; 37: 408–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Petrides, KV, McManus, IC. Mapping medical careers: questionnaire assessment of career preferences in medical school applicants and final-year students. BMC Med Educ 2004; 4: 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Levine, SP, Barzansky, B, Blumberg, P, Flaherty, JA. Can psychiatrists be recruited in medical school? J Psychiatr Educ 1983; 7: 240–8.Google Scholar
25 Curtis-Barton, MT, Eagles, JM. Factors that discourage medical students from pursuing a career in psychiatry. Psychiatrist 2011; 35: 425–9.Google Scholar
26 Budd, S, Kelley, R, Day, R, Variend, H, Dogra, N. Student attitudes to psychiatry and their clinical placements. Med Teach 2011; 33: e58692.Google Scholar
27 Farooq, K, Lydall, GJ, Malik, A, Ndetei, DM, Bhugra, D. Why medical students choose psychiatry – a 20 country cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Haider, N, Hadjidemetriou, C, Pearson, R, Farooq, K, Lydall, GJ, Malik, A, et al. Student career choice in psychiatry: findings from 18 UK medical schools. Int Rev Psychiatry 2013; 25: 438–44.Google Scholar
29 Maidment, R, Livingston, G, Katona, M, Whitaker, E, Katona, C. Carry on shrinking: career intentions and attitudes to psychiatry of prospective medical students. Psychiatrist 2003; 27: 30–2.Google Scholar
30 McParland, M, Noble, LM, Livingston, G, McManus, C. The effect of a psychiatric attachment on students' attitudes to and intention to pursue psychiatry as a career. Med Educ 2003; 37: 447–54.Google Scholar
31 Maidment, R, Livingston, G, Katona, C, McParland, M, Noble, L. Change in attitudes to psychiatry and intention to pursue psychiatry as a career in newly qualified doctors: a follow-up of two cohorts of medical students. Med Teach 2004; 26: 565–9.Google Scholar
32 Denman, M, Oyebode, F, Greening, J. Reasons for choosing to specialise in psychiatry: differences between core psychiatry trainees and consultant psychiatrists. BJPsych Bull 2016; 40: 1923.Google Scholar
33 Calvert, SH, Sharpe, M, Power, M, Lawrie, SM. Does undergraduate education have an effect on Edinburgh medical students' attitudes to psychiatry and psychiatric patients? J Nerv Merit Dis 1999; 187: 757–61.Google ScholarPubMed
34 Archdall, C, Atapattu, T, Anderson, E. Qualitative study of medical students' experiences of a psychiatric attachment. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 21–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Rajagopal, S, Rehill, KS, Godfrey, E. Psychiatry as a career choice compared with other specialties: a survey of medical students. Psychiatrist 2004; 28: 444–6.Google Scholar
36 Korszun, A, Dharmaindra, N, Koravangattu, V, Bhui, K. Teaching medical students and recruitment to psychiatry: attitudes of psychiatric clinicians, academics and trainees. Psychiatrist 2011; 35: 350–3.Google Scholar
37 Woolf, K, Elton, C, Newport, M. The specialty choices of graduates from Brighton and Sussex Medical School: a longitudinal cohort study. SMC Med Educ 2015; 15: 46.Google Scholar
38 Barras, C, Harris, J. Psychiatry recruited you, but will it retain you? Survey of trainees' opinions. Psychiatrist 2012; 36: 71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Dein, K, Livingston, G, Bench, C. ‘Why did I become a psychiatrist?’: survey of consultant psychiatrists. Psychiatrist 2007; 31: 227–30.Google Scholar
40 Lyons, Z. Attitudes of medical students toward psychiatry and psychiatry as a career: a systematic review. Acad Psychiatry 2013; 37: 150–7.Google Scholar
41 Qureshi, H, Carney, S, Iversen, A. Narrative review of the impact of clinical psychiatry attachments on attitudes to psychiatry. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 104–10.Google Scholar
42 El-Sayeh, HG, Budd, S, Waller, R, Holmes, J. How to win the hearts and minds of students in psychiatry. Advan Psychiatr Treat 2006; 12: 182–92.Google Scholar
43 Mukherjee, K, Maier, M, Wessely, S. UK crisis in recruitment into psychiatric training. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 210–4.Google Scholar
44 Shah, P, Brown, T, Eagles, J. Choosing psychiatry: factors influencing career choice among foundation doctors in Scotland. In Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates (eds Brown, T, Eagles, J): 255–63. RCPsych Publications, 2011.Google Scholar
45 Kelley, TA, Brown, J, Carney, S. Foundation Programme psychiatry placement and doctors' decision to pursue a career in psychiatry. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 30–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Greening, J, Tarn, M, Purkis, J. How to run a psychiatry summer school. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 6571.Google Scholar
47 Ajaz, A, David, R, Brown, D, Smuk, M, Korszun, A. BASH: badmouthing, attitudes and stigmatisation in healthcare as experienced by medical students. BJPsych Bull 2016; 40: 97102.Google Scholar
48 Ahmed, K, Bennett, DM, Haider, N, Byrne, P. Medfest: the effect of a national medical film festival on attendees' attitudes to psychiatry and psychiatrists and medical students' attitudes to a career in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 2015; 39: 335–8.Google Scholar
49 Kerby, J, Calton, T, Dimambro, B, Flood, C, Glazebrook, C. Anti-stigma films and medical students' attitudes towards mental illness and psychiatry: randomised controlled trial. Psychiatrist 2008; 32: 345–9.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Summary of the abstracts reviewed to identify relevant papers. CAMHS, child and adolescent mental health services.

Figure 1

Table 1 Study characteristics

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.