<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org">
<title>Psychiatric Bulletin current issue</title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org</link>
<description>Psychiatric Bulletin RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>May  1 2008 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Psychiatric Bulletin</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0955-6036</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/ibc?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/161?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/164?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/177?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/192?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/200?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/200-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Psychiatric Bulletin</title>
<url>http://pb.rcpsych.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/ibc?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Mark Salter]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/ibc?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fannon, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.020271</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Mark Salter]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ibc</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>E-interview</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/161?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] The community psychiatrist in 2008: anachronism, Cinderella or pioneer?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/161?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holloway, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.019513</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] The community psychiatrist in 2008: anachronism, Cinderella or pioneer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/164?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Direct referrals from social services to community teams for older people with mental illness]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/164?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the open referral system from social 
services to a community mental health team (CMHT) for older people. Referral 
letters from social services to the specialist team were reviewed, as were the 
case notes.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Of the 40 referrals, 95% (<I>n</I>=38) were accepted by the CMHT. Only 
15% (<I>n</I>=6) fulfilled the team&rsquo;s existing referral criteria. The 
majority of referrals (<I>n</I>=36, 90%) had details of the patient&rsquo;s 
mental health problems. None of the referrals with memory problems had a 
cognitive assessment. Of the 38 referrals accepted by the CMHT, 36 were found 
to be suffering from a mental illness. The open referral system from social 
services did not increase the total number of annual referrals.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Social services play an important role in identifying and referring older 
people with mental illness and ensure a potentially rapid referral route 
bypassing primary care. The practice of accepting direct referrals from social 
services should be encouraged and made an integral part of the referral 
system.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Das, S., Bouman, W. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.015883</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Direct referrals from social services to community teams for older people with mental illness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>164</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Exploration of in-patient attitudes towards smoking within a large mental health trust]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To explore the smoking habits of in-patients on psychiatric wards, their 
beliefs about the effects of smoking on health, and their attitudes towards 
hospital and government smoking policies. Face-to-face interviews with 135 
in-patients were conducted.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>A total of 54.1% of participants smoked. Smoking was less prevalent in 
those aged 65 years and older (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001). Non-smokers were more 
likely to believe smoking to be harmful to health (<I>P</I>=0.002). Overall, 
71.1% of the participants favoured the existing smoking policy, with only 3.0% 
wanting a complete ban on smoking and 54.1% agreeing with banning smoking in 
public places.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Further studies are warranted into the views of in-patients elsewhere and 
to see whether attitudes change as trusts tighten their smoking policies. 
Outdoor smoking areas may need to be considered, although in practice this may 
not be possible in all trusts.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, J., O'Callaghan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017608</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Exploration of in-patient attitudes towards smoking within a large mental health trust]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] The quality of internet information on depression for lay people]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To examine the quality of information concerning depression available on 
the internet, identify factors associated with &lsquo;good&rsquo; quality, and 
develop a simple-to-use instrument for assessing websites on depression. The 
Depression-Website Content Checklist was developed and compared with a 
previously validated, yet too complex, scale. Websites were assessed using 
both instruments.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Good quality information is more likely to be found on websites provided by 
governmental, professional and charitable organisations. The differences we 
observed in the median scores for these websites using the Depression-Website 
Content Checklist are significant at the 0.05 level (<I>C</I><SUB>tot</SUB>; 
Mann-Whitney, <I>U</I>=24.00; <I>P</I>=0.013). The Depression-Website 
Content Checklist is a valid and reliable user-friendly tool.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Patients can be directed towards better quality information by diverting 
them to public and non-sponsored websites. Clinicians can use the 
Depression-Website Content Checklist to determine website quality.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferreira-Lay, P., Miller, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.016188</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] The quality of internet information on depression for lay people]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Audit of metabolic syndrome in adults prescribed clozapine in community and long-stay in-patient populations]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHODS</b></p>
 
<p>To calculate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients receiving 
clozapine in community and long-stay in-patient settings. Patients were 
assessed using measures specified by the Expert Panel of the US National 
Cholesterol Education Program.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was calculated as 53% in the 
community groups and 11% in the in-patient group, although both sample sizes 
(particularly the in-patient group) were small. Women were more frequently 
affected than men in the community population.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The higher percentage of metabolic syndrome in the community patients 
receiving clozapine has implications with respect to physical health. The 
reasons for the lower percentage in the in-patient group are unclear. Our 
findings point to a possible difference in the physical health of long-stay 
psychiatric in-patients and patients in the community.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan, D., Sargeant, M., Chukwuma, J., Hughes, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017343</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Audit of metabolic syndrome in adults prescribed clozapine in community and long-stay in-patient populations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/177?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Comparison of older people with psychosis living in the community and in care homes]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/177?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To compare two groups of older people with chronic schizophrenia or 
delusional disorder living in the community and in care homes, along the 
domains of morbidity suggested by prior research. From the case-load of one 
old age psychiatrist, 22 individuals with chronic psychosis residing in care 
homes were compared to 23 living in their own homes. The measures used were: 
the Positive and Negative Symptom Score (PANSS; 
<cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref7"><b>Kay <I>et al</I>, 
1987</b></cross-ref>); the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE; 
<cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref4"><b>Folstein <I>et al</I>, 
1975</b></cross-ref>); the Burvill Physical Illness Scale 
(<cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref1"><b>Burvill <I>et al</I>, 
1990</b></cross-ref>); and an Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL; Lawton 
<I>et al</I>, 1969).</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Those in care homes had significantly higher PANSS scores (38.9 <I>v</I>. 
21.0, <I>P</I>&lt;0.01), largely accounted for by significantly more deficit 
symptoms (14.2 <I>v</I>. 5.6, <I>P</I>&lt;0.01). They also had poorer 
cognition and significantly greater impairment in daily-life activities but 
their medical condition was not significantly worse. Most were seen only by a 
psychiatrist.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The greater morbidity and disablement of older people with chronic 
schizophrenia or delusional disorder living in care homes is likely to be 
intrinsic to the disorder but does not appear to be taken into account in 
current service planning or delivery.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clancy, E., Baldwin, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017525</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Comparison of older people with psychosis living in the community and in care homes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>179</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] To trust or not to trust? Faith issues in psychopharmacological prescribing]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To ascertain attitudes, awareness, knowledge and variations in prescribing 
habits of psychiatrists when addressing issues of faith, culture and dietary 
requirements (in keeping with the General Medical Council&rsquo;s and the 
Royal College of Psychiatrists&rsquo; guidelines), and how these may affect 
the trust in doctor-patient relations. We undertook a cross-sectional postal 
survey aimed at clinicians in South West Yorkshire Mental Health Trust.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>We obtained 38 responses (40% of the total number of questionnaires sent 
out) from two mailshots. Although the majority of respondents indicated that 
they were aware of the presence of potentially forbidden animal-derived 
ingredients in medication, only half expressed the view that a discussion 
regarding the above should take place prior to prescribing such 
medication.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Diversity training combined with taking a genuine interest in 
patients&rsquo; wishes will not only minimise &lsquo;mistrust&rsquo; but also 
facilitate prescribing in a therapeutic relationship.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khokhar, W. A., Hameed, I., Ali, M. M., Sadiq, J., Bowie, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] To trust or not to trust? Faith issues in psychopharmacological prescribing]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Five-year follow-up of an evidence-based prescribing intervention]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>We studied the impact of an evidence-based multidisciplinary intervention 
to reduce six sub-optimal aspects of psychotropic prescribing, combined as a 
Prescribing Practice Quality (PPQ) score over a 5-year 
follow-upperiodinacommunity mental health service.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Sub-optimal prescribing practices were significantly reduced after 1 year 
and these improvements were sustained at 5-year follow-up. The PPQ scores were 
significantly reduced (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001) in both the overall population 
attending at each follow-up point as well as in the ever-present population 
(<I>n</I>=163). Use of high-dose antipsychotics and thioridazine ceased 
entirely; use of sedative hypnotic agents was less amenable to reduction.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Multifaceted interventions can achieve sustained improvements in 
prescribing practices in real-world settings.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meagher, D., Pullela, A., Meisinger, M., Geaney, N., O'Brien, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Five-year follow-up of an evidence-based prescribing intervention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Psychiatric supervision of student university counsellors: a specialist registrar's perspective]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ganeshalingam, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017970</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Psychiatric supervision of student university counsellors: a specialist registrar's perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Building capacity for leadership and teamwork: developing, delivering and evaluating an experiential group relations conference]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIM AND METHODS</b></p>
 
<p>Specialist registrars in psychotherapy, at various stages of their 
training, attended a 1-day experiential group relations conference. The aim 
was to provide a training context in which trainees could reflect, through 
direct experience, on their capacity for leadership and teamwork, and the 
difficulties in taking up one&rsquo;s own authority in role.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Participants rated (on a 5-point Likert scale) the various structured 
elements of the conference as being greater than moderately useful for their 
learning. At 9-month follow-up, median scores were 4, indicating that the 
conference had a moderate to high impact on the participants&rsquo; learning 
in four key dimensions: effective communication, taking up a leadership role, 
dealing with task- and role-related anxiety, and containing others&rsquo; 
psychological projections.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>There is often little time to reflect on one&rsquo;s experiences or 
behaviour in professional environment. The study demonstrates that learning 
about one&rsquo;s behaviour, capacity for leadership, performing various roles 
and the ability to act with authority, in a facilitated experiential learning 
environment can make a significant contribution to the development of future 
consultant psychiatrists in psychotherapy. In the light of the new curriculum 
(<cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref5"><b>Royal College of Psychiatrists, 
2006</b></cross-ref>), this training model may facilitate the achievement of 
core and general competencies for all trainee psychiatrists.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryson, S., Asher, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017699</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Building capacity for leadership and teamwork: developing, delivering and evaluating an experiential group relations conference]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Education &amp; training</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/192?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Education & training] A development programme for newly appointed consultants]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/192?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spurgeon, P., Vassilas, C. A., Flanagan, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017780</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Education & training] A development programme for newly appointed consultants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>194</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Education &amp; training</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New Ways of Working]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New Ways of Working]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New Ways of Working: fences and cuckoos]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jolley, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.195a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New Ways of Working: fences and cuckoos]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New Ways of Working: power, responsibility and pounds]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/195-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benbow, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.195b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New Ways of Working: power, responsibility and pounds]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Assessment of mental capacity: who can do it, or who should do it?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[du Toit, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Assessment of mental capacity: who can do it, or who should do it?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Re-examination of forensic psychiatry needs a proper examination of alternatives]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bickle, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.196a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Re-examination of forensic psychiatry needs a proper examination of alternatives]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Does hyoscine need to be 'legally' prescribed?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/196-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woochit, V., Husain, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.196b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Does hyoscine need to be 'legally' prescribed?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New exam structure - too much too soon?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker-Glenn, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] New exam structure - too much too soon?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Forensic psychiatry and general psychiatry: re-examining the relationship]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunn, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.197a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Forensic psychiatry and general psychiatry: re-examining the relationship]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Trainees' views on service user and carer involvement in training: a perspective from the West Midlands]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/197-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narula, A., Furlong, E., Fung, N. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.197b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Trainees' views on service user and carer involvement in training: a perspective from the West Midlands]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Whose line is it anyway?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Hecke, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Whose line is it anyway?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] Dr Frances Felicity Kerr (nee Gibbs)]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollin, H. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.020552</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] Dr Frances Felicity Kerr (nee Gibbs)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>199</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obituaries</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/200?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Mentalization-based Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Practical Guide]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/200?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayward, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.106.014076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Mentalization-based Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Practical Guide]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/200-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correction] Correction for Volume 32, p. 103]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/5/200-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.5.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correction] Correction for Volume 32, p. 103]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>